Ten Reasons Why You Should Not Buy New Masters of the Universe Figures by Mattel

Jason Lindholm
"I have the power!" That's the classic line that He-Man would shout, at the top of his lungs, every so often on the classic 1980's Masters of the Universe cartoons. He-Man, Skeletor, Zodac, Man-At-Arms, Tri Klops, Teela, and many others possessed the 'power' to make millions of kids watch them daily. Then that power extended to a line of great toys. In the early 80's, Mattel released some of the most accurate looking toys on the market. He-Man the toy looked just like He-Man the cartoon character. Skeletor was just as realistic. When you played with the toys, and yes, we actually opened them and played with them, it was easy to recreate what you saw on television. The toys were amazing. Not only were they larger than most action figures of the time (ie. Star Wars), but they were durable. I loved them.

Then, about five years ago, when I heard that Mattel was reissuing them, I could hardly wait to see them. Many of the new Star Wars figures look great but several looked ridiculous. I had hopes that the new Masters of the Universe figures would be equally impressive. When they were finally released, I, and millions of fans, were disappointed. So here are the 10 reasons why you shouldn't buy the new Masters of the Universe figures made by Mattel.

#10) Mattel is just trying to capitalize upon our nostalgia for the 1980's. This isn't always a bad thing. VH1 recently ran several series titled "I Love the 80's". That bit of nostalgia worked. The shows are wonderful. The reason why is because they are authentic and accurate. The new Masters of the Universe figures are neither.

#9) Everybody is on steroids. Much like the 1995 series of Star Wars figures, the 2004 Masters of the Universe figures are way to muscular. The 1995 Luke Skywalker figure looked like he could bench press a Bantha. It was as if Luke had been working out at the Balco Labs. Granted, He-Man and most of the characters in the Masters of the Universe series were very muscular, but the original 1980's figures depicted them in a way that wasn't grotesque. Those from 2004 are ALL muscles. It is crazy and ugly. He-Man's bicep shouldn't be twice the size of his head.

#8) The price. The old figures were about $3 each. The new figures cost roughly $8 each. Now, I understand the whole inflation and 20 years later bit, but this is still insane. These toys are meant to be for kids but kids can't pay that much and be able to collect an entire set.

#7) They should be intended for kids but are actually made for adults. This is the fact that toy makers realize. Adult collectors make up nearly 60% of all toys bought. Toy companies take advantage of this by releasing dozens of figures that are unnecessary (He-Man in different outfits, or worse, same figure with different packaging) but know that adults collectors will buy anything with the name (Masters of the Universe) on the box. This also allows for higher prices. It ruined the baseball card industry and may ruin the toy industry.

#6) They aren't built to scale. I touched briefly on this in #9, but it needs more explaining. The original toys were more to scale. The head, arms, torso, and legs were symmetrical and proportional. On the newer Masters of the Universe figures, everything is awkward looking. Heads are the size of peas, legs are twice as long with very little room for torso, arms are gigantic, and every muscle is huge. Why did they do this?

#5) Made to be collected. This is why today's toys, baseball cards, and virtually anything that people buy, to collect, will be worth less in the future than when they bough it new in a store. Millions of people did buy the new Masters of the Universe figures, but how many of these people opened them? Maybe 25%? Nobody opens their toys any longer. Everybody buys them and stores them in boxes and thinks that in 20 years that they will be worth a fortune (like the original Star Wars figures). This is not the case. Millions of these figures are sitting around collecting dust in millions of peoples' closets. If you are buying them as an investment, you will be disappointed.

#4) The packing is ugly. For those who do like to keep their toys unopened, these are some ugly looking packages. They all look alike. You have to look hard to even see the figures amid the sea of red and purple. I just think that they are ugly.

#3) The figures, when opened, are difficult to distinguish from each other. This has nothing to do with scale, muscles, or anything other than the appearance of them. If you had 20 Masters of the Universe figures from the 80's and 20 Masters of the Universe figures from the 2000's all opened and on a table, you would be able to see what I mean. The newer ones all look alike. Everybody has the same design or body type or something. It is annoying.

#2) The originals are cheaper. The original Masters of the Universe figures from the 80's cost as little as $1 each (opened). Unopened figures are very expensive. If you buy newer figures, with intent to open them, you're going to pay nearly $10 each for them and they will not look as cool as the originals.

And the number one reason why you should not buy the new Masters of the Universe figures from Mattel.

#1) They are just plain ugly. Just look at them. Every aspect of these figures; from looks, to packaging, to colors, to size, to price, to everything, is just plain ugly. They are one of the worst toy lines in the history of collecting. When you consider that the original Masters of the Universe figures are one of the best toy lines ever, you realize that they no longer "have the power!"

Published by Jason Lindholm

My name is Jason Lindholm. I have a Masters in English/Creative Writing. Since graduating I have been working as a writer. I have finished two books and do freelance. Remember, a writer writes...always. Love...  View profile

  • Original Masters of the Universe figures are awesome
  • Newer Mastrers of the Universe figures are hideous
  • Buy the originals for a fraction of the price of the new figures
A few years Mattel released a handful of "original" figures in limited edition packages that were identical to their 1980's versions. These are worth buying.

9 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Jacob9/14/2011

    The new line of Masters of the Universe toys are made after Dolph Lundgren the new toy line and cartoon should have been made like the old and what the hell is up with the sword it looks retarded even the 80's movie sword sucks why didnt they stick with the original sword?

  • Fallacious Scrumb6/23/2009

    Buddy, your full of sh*t, these are superhero characters who are built to look like this as its a fantasy. Get a grip.

  • devil1/28/2008

    I like the new toys, all your points just show your hate for the new things, the new collection is awesome, it has more details and for sure they dont look the same, the old ones that are great too really look the same.

  • M.D.7/25/2007

    I think you've missed the boat man. The new he-man toys are made for both adults and kids. The new cartoon as well as the toys reflect the modern stylized/anime flare that kids love now, as seen in "the batman" line of figures for instance. This is the reason for the figure distortion, hey-go blame Japan. The toys are made for adults like us as well for everybody wants to see ultra detailed versions of toys they used to love. The fact that the new figs. were sculpted by the "four horsemen" of McFarlane toys fame is a testament to what Mattel was trying to achieve in the industry. However, as you yourself noted- Mattel destroyed the cartoon and the new toy line because of wretched distribution practices and a saturation of worthless he-man and skeletor variants. If everything had been handled correctly the new he-man toys would have lasted as long as the old one did. Alas.

  • Aw Come On!4/18/2007

    Wa Wa Wa quit your moaning and complaining, I am a 26 year old dad who loved the he man cartoon and moral at the end of every episode, I bought every reasonably priced motu figure I could find right before the show went off the air and the new line went out of production. my boy loves the show and playing with the action figures, I only wish it was still on air and new figures where coming out. must have been all the nostalgic memories they where capitalizing on right? or maybe they where too muscular for a cartoon depicting action figures with sound values. bring back he man for all the kids who are now parents discouraged by todays plotless violence, smoke machines cant make a man and you cant blame me! Nag.

  • S. Santos4/17/2007

    I love the new MOTU collection. The toys are very very nice. Sometimes He-Man looks like a post-modern sex symbol, but his hair is a lot like original MOTU cartoons and his face and body proportions are strong. Designing the arms and legs longer makes the body look more agile. And look at Skeletor's muscles, the details, that guy looks invencible. And both swords are very well designed. And take a look at Teela, in the new collection she's a lot better than in the 80's one that looked that she couldn't hurt a fly. Besides de novelty of the 80s toys I think this colelction is very good and yes, they're collectible toys but one can play with them. They're not like the static action cinema figures that we know today.

  • TODDY4/1/2007

    Wow. Grow up. The old figures were hideous, but we loved them. Don't make it sound like they were crafted by Michelangelo. Jeeze.

  • Jason Lindholm9/16/2006

    Exactly. They don't even look like the old figures at all. It's a shame and a bad attempt to make money by capitalizing on nostalgia.

  • Constance Phillips9/15/2006

    I was just tempted to buy the Sorceress and the Evilynn figurines out of nostalgia's sake. But yeah, they're not toys, they're collectable figures. Difference there...

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.