Texas Rep. Joe Barton Apologizes to BP!
"Good Ole Boy" Oilman, Masquerading as Congressman, Calls Relief Fund a "Shakedown"
At a hearing of the Energy and Commerce Committee, intended to call BP CEO Tony Hayward on the carpet, Representative Joe Barton (R-Tex) said "I am ashamed of what happened at the White House yesterday," referring to Obama's demand that BP set up a $20 billion dollar relief fund for oil-spill victims.
Barton continued: "I apologize, I do not want to live in a country where any time a citizen or a corporation does something that is legitimately wrong is subject to some sort of political pressure that is - again, in my words, amounts to a shakedown, So I apologize." He referred to the fund as "a tragedy of enormous proportion," insinuating that it would prevent BP from making money. Earlier this week, he referred to the criticism of BP as "Monday morning quarterbacking," and repeated the urban myth that China is drilling in the Gulf. (For the record, China is NOT drilling off the coast of Florida or Cuba, this is another lie that's been repeated over and over for more than three years. See Politifact.)
Some clarification on Barton's motives, who happens to be the top republican in the House Energy and Commerce Committee? Well, he's a former ARCO executive, and the single largest recipient of oil money in the Congress over the past 20 years. His largest contributor is Anadarko Petroleum, who owns 25% of the Deepwater Horizon well. Can you say fox in the henhouse!
Outrage from both parties resulted in Barton's retracting his statement hours later, where he apologized for using the word "shakedown." He then went on to say, ""I want the record to be absolutely clear that I think BP is responsible for this accident," he said. "If anything I said this morning has been misconstrued, in opposite effect, I want to apologize for that misconstruction."
Misconstrued? MISCONSTRUED?! Excuse me, how can the word "shakedown" be "misconstrued?" And despite the fact the republican leadership exacted immediate damage control, in their statement they referred to the oil spill as a "natural disaster." "The oil spill in the Gulf is this nation's largest natural disaster and stopping the leak and cleaning up the region is our top priority." Here is what other conservatives are saying about the fund and BP's responsibility:
The Republican Study Committee, a group of conservative members of the House, released a statement calling the $20 billion BP escrow account a "Chicago-style political shakedown." (See full statement here.) For the record, nearly two-thirds of the republicans in the house are members of this committee.
According to The Minnesota Independent, Tea Party candidate Michelle Bachman (R-Minn) said the fund was a "permanent ATM card," redistribution of the wealth," and accused the administration of increasing federal efforts to "take over private industry" and of "fleecing" BP.
Last week, U.S. Chamber of Commerce CEO Tom Donohue said BP should not have to foot the whole cleanup bill, that the government (ergo, the taxpayers) should also pay. Republican Minority Leader John Boehner told TPMDC's Brian Beutler that he agreed with Donohue.
Rep. Sen. John Cornyn, chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), said he 'shares' Barton's concern," accusing Obama of using the BP disaster to "mitigate" his own political problems," saying the President is trying to show "how tough he's being against BP." (Well, gee, guys, you handed it to him on a silver platter!)
Mississippi's Republican Governor Haley Barbour told Fox News that he worries that the fund will cut into BP's profits, making them, "...less able to pay us what they owe us." Considering that BP is going to make payments into this fund by installment, it shouldn't cut into their annual $30 billion cash flow.
Rush Limbaugh called it a "bailout." (Not that any sane person cares what he says.)
And last, but never least, Sarah Palin stated on the O'Reilly Factor, ""[W]e can't afford to demonize these energy producers to such an extent, though, that they go under. We do need to work with them, though, but we need to verify everything it is and hold them accountable for all that they have done in this situation." [The O'Reilly Factor, 6/15/10]. Okay, you translate it. I only speak English.
There is certainly enough blame to go around for this disaster, with BP, Transocean and Halliburton at the top of the list. There are those who argue that it's Obama's fault for not regulating the regulators. There are those who fault the Bush-era regulators for not doing their job. There are those who blame the environmentalists for driving the wells so far out. But the republicans aren't doing themselves any favors by seeming to defend BP.
When two-thirds of the republicans in the house belong to a committee who thinks taxpayers should help foot the bill for this disaster, I say they have revealed their true colors. They are more concerned with oil company profits, the oil companies in which they are invested and who donate to their campaigns. And while Barton was publicly taken to the wood shed and forced to apologize, I would bet my house that many conservatives hunkered around their kitchen tables last night in heated defense of Barton's remarks.
This was not a natural disaster like Katrina. This is a man-made disaster, caused by BP putting the bottom line above safety, operating rigs based on unfinished engineering drawings and not making sure that simple things were taken care of, like making sure the battery that runs the shut off valves wasn't dead. They've also lied from the beginning about the amount of oil escaping. While they admitted on June 17th that 60,000 barrels a day is spewing, they've known that for over a month,, but repeatedly released numbers far below that.
Personally, I think twenty billion is going to prove a drop in the bucket when it comes to righting this disaster. Anyone with any misdirected sympathy towards BP should perhaps try to explain it to the shrimpers, fishermen and fishing charter companies, or the folks who livelihoods depend on tourism. Some of these businesses won't recover for decades. Or go down to the Gulf and help bury the dead wildlife. Or pat future flood victims on the back with a "there, there" when the wetlands destroyed by this spill are no longer able to protect their properties from hurricanes. And, oh, yeah, don't forget to visit the families of those eleven dead oil workers.
Sources: Barton apology draws outrage; BP Chief "Out of Loop"; Barton Retracts Apology; Conservatives call escrow account "Chicago Style Shakedown"; BP Escrow fund Obama's Permanent ATM Card; Taxpayers Should pay for clean up; Cornyn Shares Barton's Concern; Barbour, Bachmann Explain Principles for Holding BP Accountable; BP Quiet on Escrow Demand
Published by Patricia Sicilia - Featured Contributor in Travel
A Domestic Travel Featured Contributor, Patricia Sicilia's wordsmithing began at age 9 when, after reading a book way too old for her, she told her mother "I'm retiring to my boudoir." Freelancing for over... View profile
- The BP Oil Leak in the Gulf Coast: a Great Reason to Stop Using OilThe oil spill ravaging the Gulf of Mexico is a great reason to focus on alternative energies, but the majority of Americans don't agree.
- Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico - Most Effective Methods to Clean UpWhat kind of methods would be most effective to prevent one of the worst environmental disaster in decades?
- Concerns of the Effects of the Oil Spill in the Tampa Bay RegionThis articles tells of some of the concerns of Tampa Bay businesses as a result of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The spill will impact both the fishing and tourism industry in Florida.
- Texas Congressman Joe Barton is a Joke - He Apologizes to BP for Their Oil Spill /...Texas Congressman Joe Barton does not represent the people.
Disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. Deepwater Horizon Oil SpillWill the people of the gulf coast survive the oil spill?
- Rep. Joe Barton Apologizes to BP for White House Shakedown
- The Deepwater Horizon Disaster - Part 1 - Stopping the Oil Spill in the Gulf of Me...
- Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico: An Open Letter to U.S. Leaders
- The Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico and Katrina Are Not the Same
- Is President Obama to Blame for the Oil Spill in the Gulf?
- How Will the Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico Affect the Flower Garden Banks Coral...
- If There Had Not Been a Secret Energy Task Force, There Would Not Have Been the Oi...





38 Comments
Post a CommentThis is a great report!!!
It is hard on politicians when dealing with a big employer, I'm glad he agreed BP was to blame :)
Great piece! Barton obviously didn't get the memo not to kiss up to big money donors in public. I'm sure he'll be more discrete next time.
EXCELLENT write up. You are ABSOLUTELY right when you point out the difference between the BP disaster and natural disasters. They are two completely different things. And as far as what Snidely Whiplash said, if the president hadn't addressed the issue, everybody would have thought he was ignoring his duties as president. Most people don't care about the differences between the executive, the legislative, and the judicial branch. The president is the president and when something of the magnitude of BP occurs, the people want to be informed.
Well, I disagree that they were strong arm tactics. Were you there? No. And Obama didn't make him do anything backed up by law, it was a mutual agreement between him and BP, he didn't us any law to coerce BP to create a fund, and when the opposition acts like he did, they are ONCE AGAIN PROMULGATING A LIE THAT WILL BE REPEATED OVER AND OVER AGAIN. It's what the conservatives do best, e.g., death panels.
I think your "spin" in the overview is inaccurate. Barton WAS NOT apologizing for BP being made to pay for what they are indeed responsible for. he was apologizing for the strong arm tactics employed by the Exec. branch. Did ya know Obama cannot do that? Pick up the Constitution or any treatise on it and find me where it says President's can do such. Law means nothing as long as your ends are served. It's really a sad commentary on the state of partisanship in the US when a whole ideology has no respect for law so long as they get what they want.
I must point out Don, that "bailouts" were first instituted under Bush. Obama's "bailouts" were only continuing an existing precedent!
Republicans are really being exposed for being just as much for bailouts as the Democrats are. Agreed the economic bottom line for this disaster will likely exceed anything they are estimating now. The drilling moratorium just got shot down, WOW!
This was not a natural disaster.
Having read all the other comments too - I agree it's time to get to work. Everybody should now understand the effect that greed can have on the environment. It was greed that caused this, and now it's time to clean up the mess, and to try and make sure it doesn't happen again.