The Volt was imaginatively named after one of its power sources It is an electric car that will do 40 miles on a charge, before the petrol-powered engine kicks in. That's not very impressive. Or it is rather, but I'm not impressed at how long you can drive on a charge, but how little you can drive on a charge! 40 miles? One word - pathetic!
Tesla, the first company to give us a 100% battery powered sports car is said to run out of juice in over 200 miles. On Top Gear, Jeremy Clarkson proved that you can drive it hard and fast enough to make it run out in less than 60. But 60 is fine. I drive about 60 miles in a week. OK, maybe more, but no matter. 40 miles is a poor claim.
There's another very important aspect of this whole battery powered car thing - it just won't work! If you're going to alter our fuel source, don't use a battery. You're not saving the planet! It is still a very dirty business of mining the lithium ion, shipping it, packaging, etc,... If you're going to alter fuel source, it's got to be hydrogen!
There is, however, one thing going for the Volt, and that's looks. It certainly looks electric, and like the Camaro, it does have characteristics of a robot. Maybe it's just a trend in GM's new concepts, since GM and Transformers have a little deal going.
I think it's absolutely hopeless though. If GM decided to build a car that looks like a Volt, but was powered by a hydrogen Fuel-Cell, I would take great interest in it. And if they decided to try to build an engine that runs on hydrogen fuel, like BMW, I would also take great interest in it. But since it's a petty little battery that will propel you to a distance of 40 miles on a charge, before a regular engine kicks in, I wouldn't even take another look at it if I were out to buy a car. Needless to say that 40 miles is still just a claim; it's just a figure. It doesn't mean anything to me because I suspect that if you drive it like there's no tomorrow, you'll end up doing only about five miles before the battery is out.
So, it looks great, it may feel and drive great, and it's just as damaging to mother nature as a regular engine, but the driver doesn't do all the damage, the factory does most of the damage. What's the point? Well, I think there is no point. I just think that GM is trying to appeal to Eco-mentalists who think that petrol-powered cars will kill the planet in the next five years. And they got them suckered in as well, thinking that it produces no emissions for 40 miles, before it starts killing the planet. If only these Eco-mentalists saw how the battery power was mined.
Published by Serge Pupko
I've been into cars for a long time now. It started as a little kid when I started drawing cars for fun. My cars, though, did not have guns and fins on them, well, most of them didn't, to say the least. I fo... View profile
- Most Fuel Efficient Vehicles for 2010I have listed below a variety of fuel efficient vehicles for 2010 available now or in the near future.
- Detroit Auto Show: Ford Airstream, Chevrolet Volt and Mazda RyugaThe Detroit Auto Show proved to be an exciting day trip!
- Top Choices for 2010's Green Cars Feature HybridsA 2010 green car can help you save on gasoline, but your mileage may not improve as much as you imagine, and the 2010 green car will cost you more money.
- Hybrid and Electric Cars: Release Date Calendar 2010-2011Here's a comprehensive calendar of release dates in 2009-2011 for the most significant and exciting hybrid electric and electric car models, from fuel-sipping hybrids to luxury electric sedans.
- The Chevy Volt - Stalled in a Time WarpWhy haven't we been able to develop, cheap, reliable, batteries for an electric, plug in car, 108 years, after Thomas Edison worked on the same problem.?
- Chevy Volt Pictures Leaked
- The Chevy Volt Electric Car - General Motors Unveils Its Revolutionary Vehicle
- Why the Chevy Volt Must Succeed
- Most Fuel Efficient 2010 Cars
- The New Chevy Volt: A Car that Uses No Gas
- Chevy Volt: The Dawn of the Electric Car
- Volt Jump-starts General Motors



