According to the Times' report, the plus-up in American troops could number as many as 10,000. The plan for a surge, of course, mirrors the effort undertaken by President Bush and General David Petraeus in Iraq beginning in early 2007. The security situation in Afghanistan has been steadily deteriorating for more than a year, and Bush is planning to address that problem with a multi-faceted approach that will utilize all the elements of national power.
The Times quotes Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen as saying, "The trends across the board are not going in the right direction. It has been very, very tough fighting this year and it will be tougher next year unless we [develop] a way to get at all aspects of the challenge."
The Times says Bush "...is eager to pass on the lesson learnt from the troop surge in Iraq." Perhaps the most important lesson is that military force alone cannot hope to succeed. Additional troops can help decrease levels of violence, reduce Taliban influence, and secure more territory, but simultaneous efforts across the diplomatic, information, and economic fronts are needed as well.
It is also crucial to understand that Afghanistan is different from Iraq. Simply taking the Petraeus plan from Iraq and transferring it to Afghanistan will not work. An independent assessment must be conducted before moving forward with any strategy. That said, Petraeus is probably the right man for the job. He can draw on lessons learned from his time in Iraq, but ultimately he will be forced to use his knowledge of and experience in counterinsurgency to develop a unique plan to bring stability to Afghanistan.
Petraeus has already begun work on a new Afghanistan strategy. Mullen told the Times, "It's the full spectrum - the political piece, the diplomatic piece, the economic piece in addition to the security piece - that has got to improve dramatically."
No doubt a central piece of any Petraeus strategy will be his plan for dealing with the lawless region along the Afghanistan - Pakistan border. Cross-border raids have increased, and have become more overt, and Pakistan has been either unwilling or unable to exercise control over the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and the Northwest Frontier Province. Without some measure of stability in this region, any Afghanistan strategy is likely to fail.
Published by Greg Reeson
I am a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal and a The Veteran's Voice. I also regularly contribute to GOPUSA and The Land of the Free. View profile
- Trust is Theme for State of the UnionIn his last State of the Union address, Bush emphasizes trust. Did the address inspire the nation to trust the President's plans for the upcoming year?
- Afghan War Will Resume in the SpringFighting in Afghanistan's harsh conditions escalates in the spring with 30,000 additional troops, sent by President Obama.
Battle of Marjah, Afghanistan BeginsThe first major battle of the Afghan surge has commenced. Thousands of American, NATO, and Afghan troops are fighting to eradicate the Taliban in the southern town of Marjah, in...
Dick Cheney, Michael Moore Attack Obama on AfghanistanIn the formulation of his Afghanistan strategy, President Barack Obama has had to perform a delicate balancing act. The left thinks Obama should withdraw all troops from Afghani...- An Critical Philosophical Examination of the Road to War in IraqA critical examination of the Bush doctrine and policies of the Bush Administration, this research paper uses the arguments of past and present philosophers to more critically examine the road to war.
- Troop Surge in Iraq: President Bush's First Reckless Decision of 2007
- Foreign Policy Association Series: Examining Afghanistan
- Democrats Need Iraq Surge to Fail
- Visiting Afghanistan: A Country at a Crossroads
- Obama's New Plan for Afghanistan
- Why the Petraeus Report Has Nothing to Do with How Long the Surge Lasts
- Decoded CIA Files Reveal that President Bush is an Illegal Alien
