Prop 8 was the result.
This is a double criticism note. First of all, how can we achieve the greatest civil liberty of voting a black man into the oval office, while at the same steal away the right to marriage? How can ANYBODY vote for a black president as a vote for civil rights, while casting "yes on 8" on the same ballot? Even at our greatest moment in civil rights history, we have one of the greatest discrimination.
What's the difference that instead of "Whites only" signs, we have "Heterosexuals only" signs? What's the difference that instead of "No niggers allowed" signs, we have "No fags allowed" signs? What's the difference between the discrimination of color and the discrimination of sexuality? On Tuesday night, this AUDACITY of hope of equality was achieved for a couple hours, followed by the AUDACITY of hate. The world celebrated our progressive vote for a black president based on merit, overlooking race; but the world is blind to our regressive vote to CHANGE the traditional definition of marriage (according to CNN and our Supreme Court).
Americans be proud. Americans be ashamed.
Secondly, to those demonstrators in LA, who are furious against the decision on Prop 8, a demonstration against a popular vote is against everything America stands for. A vote is to count the voices of America, and the majority said "yes." It may be upsetting, but every losing side of every ballot feels the same way. We cannot allow demonstrations of every proposition of every election. That defeats the purpose of a vote. The proposition has been passed. It may be upsetting; however, shouting in the streets will do little good. It is stupid and childish. Instead of breaking against democracy by trying to go against a vote via a demonstration, these demonstrators should use the system of democracy. A proposition may be overturned by the Supreme Court if deemed unconstitutional. So instead of crowding the streets and contributing to LA traffic, put this obvious discrimination to the Judiciary. This is the sole reason we have the Supreme Court in the first place, to name things unconstitutional. Also, the Supreme Court has sided against the writing of Prop 8, so it shouldn't be a problem to gain the support of the Court to name this proposition unconstitutional.
Please, don't fight democracy. Use it.
Published by Robert
Hi, my name is Robert, and I'm a chronic video gamer. I'm currently a writer for PSBeyond, a Playstation focused gaming website. I'm also a student at the money vortex called University of California Irvine.... View profile
The Audacity of Hope, Indeed!It seems that the right, saddened by the realization that they probably won't get to beat on Hillary much longer, set their sights on those of us who dare to hope.- The Audacity of HopeHope in the face of adversity
- My Audacity to HopeIn today's society we all need a breath of fresh air, we need to stop and smell the roses. A new voice needs to be heard with something to say other than what's become the mundane droll of the death toll or the expen...
- The Audacity of HopeBarack Obama's intelligence, vision, and motivation to transform our country from a place of economic and international turmoil, to a union of people who coexist and strive to achieve success, is truly inspirational i...
- Bubba in the Backyard: The Politics of Race, Sex, Gender, and Class in Campagin 2008This is the first of a series of essays written during the course of Campaign 2008. In it T.S. Aschenge lays out a bold exploration of the racial foundations of the opposition to the candidacy of Barack Obama.
- The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama - Book Review
- "The Audacity of Hope" is a Breath of Fresh Air
- The Audacity Of Hope Book Review
- Obama's Invitation to Rick Warren Directly Reflects Writings in The Audacity of Hope
- Barack Obama and 'The Audacity of Hope'
- A Short Story About the Audacity of Hope
- "The Audacity of Hope" by Barack Obama (pub. 2006)

3 Comments
Post a CommentMy gay brother died of AIDS in '86, in the first wave. He loved children, would have loved to have been able to have a "legal" family.
Agreed. Its truly disturbing that so many folks would want to keep these basic rights from an entire group of people based on their sexuality alone. Conservatives get slammed for being homophobic but in a very liberal state, gay marriage was banned. Intolerance runs the gamut, sadly.
Wonderful article I am a true believer that everyone is created to love and no matter the love of a man and woman, man and man, woman and woman if it is real love then allow them the blessing of marriage.