The Best Actress of the 1960s: Bette Davis

Timothy Sexton
If you've been following my series on the best actress of each decade, that rumbling sound that's been growing in the distance is the sound of Bette Davis fans wondering how on earth I could have left their hero out. Bette Davis certainly was a finalist in the 30s and 40s, though I feel her work in the 50s peaked with All About Eve as the decade opened. I've always felt there was a certain element of the creepy about Bette Davis even in her early days when she could get away with being cast as the sexy young thing in movies like Of Human Bondage and The Petrified Forest. On the other hand, I've never bought the idea that Bette Davis is one of those actresses you either love or hate. At her best she was almost on par with Barbara Stanwyck. At her worst she could dip down to the level of Katherine Hepburn. (Just in case you misunderstand me, let me clarify: I think Katherine Hepburn is the most overrated actress of all time.)

Getting back to the creepy quality of Bette Davis, I just think that there was something about her-maybe her infamous eyes-that destined her for the work she would turn in during the 1960s. While Elizabeth Taylor turned from a sex symbol into a bona fide actress during the 60s, and while the decade witnessed the birth of new superstars from Anne Bancroft to Faye Dunaway, when one looks back upon the actress who really defines a decade only slightly better for actresses than the 1950s it is Bette Davis.

Gothic horror became her specialty, starting with A Pocketful of Miracles. I know, I know, this movie isn't really considered a gothic horror movie, but what would you call it? Bette Davis' Apple Annie contains definite hints of Baby Jane. In fact, really, when you think about it all the characters that Bette Davis ever played contain hints of Baby Jane. Of course, it is the gothic horror and horror parodies that really define Bette Davis as the best actress of the 1960s. From Whatever Happened to Baby Jane to Hush, Hush Sweet Charlotte to The Nanny and even The Anniversary, Bette Davis found a niche in this decade that nobody else could even come close to playing to such perfection. She is by turns pathetic and malevolent in these films and no one who has ever watched it is likely to forget the scene in Baby Jane where she serves dinner to her sister, played by another actress whose every role seemed to lead her straight to Whatever Happened to Baby Jane, Joan Crawford. (An interesting bit of trivia: In what must rank as the most ironic name change in movie history, Joan Crawford was actually born with the name Lucille LeSeur. I ask you, if you were given those two names and had to pick which was the real one and which was the Hollywood screen name, wouldn't you think Joan Crawford was the real one?)

The part of Baby Jane was no doubt enhanced by the macabre makeup job which was entirely prescient; Bette Davis eventually came to resemble Baby Jane as she grew older. It is quite obvious that Davis was having a grand old time in these movies. You get the distinct feeling that almost any character that she played earlier could have grown into the characters in her 60s movies. The most obvious might be Dead Ringers, which almost functions as a mirror image of an earlier Bette Davis classic called A Stolen Life. Both movies feature plots about twin sisters trying to pass themselves off as the other. But even her ambiguous character in The Nanny harkens back to some of Bette Davis' earlier roles. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that her Nanny character is really not all that different from Margo Channing in some ways. That may sound like a leap, but watch them back to back and you'll see what I mean.

Maybe it is simply because I have a built-in view of Bette Davis that is less than flattering; I just was always kind of scared of her as a kid. Whatever the reason, I am far more comfortable and impressed with the Bette Davis of Whatever Happened to Baby Jane than the Bette Davis of Jezebel. Not that I don't think you shouldn't watch her earlier movies. Do so by all means, but you simply cannot afford to miss her come into her prime in the 1960s.

Published by Timothy Sexton - Featured Contributor in Arts & Entertainment

Timothy Sexton was named this site's very first Writer of the Year. Today he has two daily columns and one weekly column on Yahoo! Movies as well as frequent irregular contributions. Mr. Sexton was twice nam...  View profile

4 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Stephen Thompson9/20/2009

    Davis the best actress of the 6os? You must be kidding! At this point she was caricatural and with lots of mannerism. Seriously, anobody who did not saw Hepburn masterpiece Long day, cant pretend that is was not great. To compare that to the grotesque whatever happen to.....is insane. Its like saying fast food is better than good food cause millions of people eat that! Sorry but numbers dont stand in front of quality. Hepburn is the best not only in the 60s where she gets 2 oscars, and made quality movies, but she is Hollywood royalty.

  • J.S.1/23/2009

    (cont)and the way they honed their skills. Bette Davis might seem to be more energetic, but Katherine Hepburn was more subtle, and if you listen to Bette Davis, and Katherine Hepburn tell their lives stories, you will understand that they had very different up bringings. So both drew from a different experience, and as they say, life immitates art. I would say that both ladies
    {Her Highness, Mary Queen of Scotts (Katherine Hepburn) and Her Royal Majesty, Queen Elisabeth (Bette Davis)} are movie queens in their own rights, and that neither should be set in contrast to the other, for it would be like compairing two stars against a film made heaven.

  • J.S.1/23/2009

    Katherine Hepburn Isn't over ratted, she is every bit the match for Bette Davis. Katherine Hepburns parts stemed from playing: Mary queen of Scotts to Elanore of Aquataine, from a Hop head, to an Oriental woman of the 1930's, from a frantic aunt who is loosing her mind, to a endearing old woman who opposites Henry Fonda, from a Little Woman, to a rich lepord chassing heiress. On a Holiday with Cary Grant, or in Philidelphia with Cary Grant and Jimmy Stewart, she was terrific. She was brilliant in "Stage door". And I don't know anyone who doesn't want to fall in love again when she is with Spencer Tracy. Her tears in Guess whose coming to dinner, are more genuine than most. I love Bette Davis. All about Eve, Little Foxes,
    Now Voyager, Hush Hush Sweet Charlotte, Where The Corn is Green, are just a few of my very favorite movies. But; Bette Davis, and Katherine Hepburn are two equals in my book. Not because of their similarities in acting, but by their differences, and the way they honed

  • Teresa Mahieu2/26/2008

    It's good to see someone else thinks Katherine Hepburn was over-rated. I found her neither glamorous nor talented. For me Bette Davis with her big eyes and grab your attention acting was a much better actress. I found confusion within your article however, did you like her or no. As I prefer horror films and comedies and as many of Bette Davis's films now have a cult following in the horror genre I would much prefer watching one of her films over Katherine Hepburn's any day. I also have a rather morbid sense of humor and find many of Bette Davis's films comical. Her movies rate a plus plus from me.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.