Sen. Obama reminds me of the liberal New York City politicians of forty years ago. They also were advocates for change. It was true that they helped the poor but it was at the expense of the middle class that were driven out of the city. I believe Obama is from the same mindset.
Sen. McCain is more realistic. He speaks about free and fair trade, not about a return to a non-productive manufacturing past. His faith in the American worker to compete in the new world order convinces me that he can help our country. He is for change but not at the expense of people who pay enough taxes.
The vast majority of voters blame the government for most of their problems. They want a government that will give them free health care and affordable housing. Many believe the wealthy should pay for those needs by higher taxation. That is why they will vote for the candidate that promises big changes in the way our government treats its people.
We all believe in change--everyone has a problem. Some believe our government is not giving us enough benefits and they need more help. Others believe the government is big enough and should only help people to help themselves.
The only thing that will change if a liberal candidate becomes our next president is that internal special interests will become more powerful. They will try to make us believe that an isolated America is better for us. McCain is more realistic and his changes will make America a more powerful player in international economics. But who ever wins we are sure to get changes.
Gamblers in Ireland are making Obama the two to one favorite to win the presidential election. I believe that Sen. Obama will become our next president. Voters want a change from present day politics and they think Obama will give them that change.
Melpol
Published by MP
How to Calculate the Greatest College Football Team EverHere's a mathematical system to calculate the best college football teams of all time.- Could Rafael Nadal Be the Best Men's Tennis Player of All-time?For the past couple of years people have been saying that Roger Federer could be the greatest men's tennis player of all-time but maybe it's actually Rafael Nadal.
- The Best Interest of the CourtOne might consider that when we hear the expression "In the best interest of the child," we can often be assured that the exact opposite is happening.
- Is He the Perfect Man for You?The way a man mows a lawn tells a lot about the way he lives his life. When you want to know if this is this the right man for you, ask him to mow the lawn.
- The "Elites" Versus the "Common Man" in AmericaThe "Power Elite" must go!
- The Next President of the United States Is...Sen. Obama? Sen. Clinton? or Sen. M...
- Obama's Vice President Running Mate Likes Sen. McCain More for President
- Sen.Obama: You Can Put Lipstick on a Pig, but It's Still a Pig!
- Obama, McCain Debating the Debate
- It's Official: Sen. Barack Obama Joins White House Race
- Uppity Pigs 'N Lipstick: How the Issues Got Lost in the Shuffle
- The McChumpies: The Best and Worst for the World of Sports in 2009


3 Comments
Post a CommentWhat you say is true. People want the guy who promises them something for nothing. There is no something for nothing, because, like you said, SOMEBODY has to pay for it! Like the old saying goes, "Any government how robs Peter to pay Paul can always count on the support of Paul".
Great write up
I feel the same way. I think McCain is a better candidate though I want the Democrats to win. We'll see. I am still trying to make up my mind............