The United States forced their control on foreign nations and thus, attempted to force their style of governing on these nations, as well. The United States has continued to attempt to spread democracy throughout the world, especially in Iraq. I do not think it is possible, nor plausible, to force one nation's form of government upon another nation, simply because that is what they think is best. This force of government and governing policies upon another nation is just one example of the change of geopolitics for the twenty-first century as a result of the aftermath of the attacks on September 11, 2001.
The changes brought on by the United State's decisions and practices are many. These changes are also quite drastic. The world now has accepted the forceful entering and control of a foreign nation by another nation, and it has also allowed the control of that nation's people, including those who are innocent. This is, very likely, politically unacceptable, or at least it was, previously. The force of one nation's form of government on another nation is, although not a new concept, becoming more acceptable in the twenty-first century than in the previous century due to the acceptance of this behavior, overall, by the United States simply as a result of the attacks that took place on September 11, 2001.
The economy of the United States and the nations involved in the wars and conflicts with the United States, either by being in war or conflict with the country, or simply offering financial support to one side or the other, has changed drastically. In the coming years, and likely decades, too, nations who have been set back, or nearly depleted financially, will have to find ways to deal with these long standing effects. The events that took place on this single day will economically affect much of the world for years after. This is possibly one of the most financially draining events that ever took place in the world, if you include the events that took place afterwards - the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq being two of the largest money drainers.
These effects are the first to be seen in this extent in the history of the world. The United States, and many other nations, will have to adapt to and find ways to deal with the numerous effects of the attacks on September 11, 2001. They will have to accept the political, governmental, and economic changes that have come and will continue to, and they will need to adapt to these changes, since the geopolitics of the 21st century will be significantly different than the previous century.
Published by Britt Baker
I am a vegetarian who is dedicated to doing my part to preserving the environment. I am a member of the Green Party, and I have previously worked for the non-profit environmental organization Clean Water Act... View profile
September 11 Memorial Events in Washington, D.C.A list of September 11th services and memorials in the Washington, DC area.- Moll Flanders: An Accurate Look into Eighteenth Century Europe Society Through Dan...Moll Flanders is a historical novel which provided an accurate look into eighteenth century Europe through the criminal life and prostitution of Moll Cutpurse and declared Daniel Defoe as the writer who started the ge...
- An Analysis of Post Civil War Attitudes in the South: The Lost CauseThe Southern historical interpretation of the Civil War is reviewed from its infancy to its acceptance nationally, and finally its legacy is discussed.
Oil Geopolitics & Iran - A Game of Monkey in the Middle Iran defends itself when they realize that, from the beginning, Bush/Cheney intended to surround Iran with forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.- How Football Can Save AfricaTorn by poverty and war the love for the game of football can be the driving force behind unity and peace, if only for 90 minutes. This paper addresses football as culturally unifying institution for players and fans...
- The Biggest Money Machine Ever, in World History, is the Government of the United...
- An Analysis of the United States Oil Policy and OPEC
- The Wasteland of the Great United States of America
- An Overview of the Non Profit Sector in the United States
- Geopolitics in the Twenty-First Century: A Primer to the United States' Surviving...
- The Airline Industry Still Reeling from the September 11, 2001, Attacks
- The Politics of the Garrison in Jamaica: Electoral Manipulation Through Patronage...




8 Comments
Post a CommentGood analysis!
Very well written. Thanks for sharing your insight.
We shouldn't be in the middle East in this half-war.
Like Noam Chomsky says, and I paraphrase, when the United States policymakers talk about "democracy," they're really saying "do what we say" or "do what we want." There were a number of treaties and agreements broken as a result of these wars, but the inaction of the rest of the world in response to the incursions was and remains emblematic of how formidable NATO is. Keen analysis.
Very thoughtful :)
: )
Fascinating insights. :-)
although I agree with you I feel that 19th century colonialism was far worst, even prior to the the colonization of the new world nearly brought the native culture to genocide and they are the original peoples of north america, then africa, india, south america and so on.