While it is sad that any parent would not want to be a part of their child's life, it is even sadder that the child support system pushes the mindset that money is more important to a child than presence. Some fathers can sleep at night, thinking they are doing their part, because they are paying their support obligations. This does not matter to the child if that father is not a presence in their life.
Would you believe that some custodial parents actually have the nerve to deny visitation when support isn't paid?
Now I'm not saying that those financial obligations aren't important. There are definitely some child related expenses that can be very difficult to carry the weight of alone. But let's dig a little deeper into how a child support obligation is set.
Both the custodial and noncustodial parents obligations are factored into the equation. The end result is usually the same: 17-20% of the noncustodial income will be paid to the custodial parent. Bear in mind, this is income that the custodial parent does not need to report, and this is an expense that a noncustodial parent is unable to report for taxes or any other statements (ex., applying for welfare when you are placed below the poverty line after paying such obligations.)
The problem with this arrangement is simple. It is not the expenses of the child that are used to determine how much money should be paid to the custodial parent. It is income. This means that one child is "worth" $200 a month, one is worth $2000 a month, and another is worth only $20 a month. The numbers just don't add up!
Noncustodial parents are highly discriminated against in the child support system. Imagine having a bill of $600 a month, and if you fell behind you could lose your license, or even go to jail! The rights of a noncustodial parent are a downright joke. If you lose your job, you have the right to file a petition to modify your support obligation. Once filed, you could be waiting up to 6 months for a court date (during which you will most likely be told 'too bad') and you are expected to continue making your payments every week.
Did you know that incarceration (being arrested and going to jail or prison for a certain amount of time) is considered involuntary unemployment, and your obligations do not change?!
One other thought to add here is that the noncustodial parent should be obligated to a certain percentage of the child expenses, but when their income is enough the custodial parent can actually pay their rent, electric, and other bills. Some of you may hate me for saying this, but those are not things that a noncustodial parent should be obligated to.
Yes, a child needs a roof over their head, but nobody should have to pay their own rent as well as half of somebody else's rent. Anybody who growls at me for saying this... think about it. If you didn't hold custody of your child, would the difference in your bills be so much that you could actually afford to pay the remaining bills without a problem? No! Everybody struggles financially, that's part of life.
But using the child support system to your advantage is a trait that makes me physically ill to think about. It is just as bad as somebody who puts all their motivation and energy into manipulating the 'system' for free money on hardworking citizens tax dollars. It's the same scenario. Support yourself! Your child does not cost you $200 a week, so even if you are eligible to receive that much why would you? That's not your money.
Child support money should be applied to child expenses. No child should be denied the presence of a parent based on money. When it all comes down to it, presence is more important. Noncustodial parents who try, but continuously fail, to keep up with the high standards of child support should not be punished.
Published by Caryn Murray
Caryn is a creative consultant and copy writer with BAM! Copy Writing. She specializes in modern media Branding (that stands out), Advertising (that shouts) and Marketing (that counts.) For more information,... View profile
- Determining Child Support Payments in Divorce CasesFederal law obligates states to institute guidelines for child-support payments. This article outlines the facotrs that are considered in determining these guidelines, and also the special circumstances that can resul...
- Lesbian Ordered to Pay Child Support to Her Former Gay-union PartnerA Vermont court ordered a woman to pay $240 a month child support to her former lesbian civil-union partner.
- How Does Nonpayment of Child Support Affect Our Lives: An AC ExperimentIf you've had to do without child support you were owed or been threatened with jail because you couldn't make your support payment, you've probably got some strong feelings on this topic.
Why is it so Hard to Get Child Support ?Florida Child Support Laws!- Marriage and Child Support...Do They Go Hand in Hand?You've finally found your match. The two of you are considering purchasing a new home, a new car or maybe having children. Suddenly the ex from the past arises like the sun for all to see and files for child support....
- Paying Child Support in the State of Indiana
- Help for Parents Trying to Collect Child Support in the State of Indiana
- John Murtari Receives Feeding Tube, Continues Passive Resistance for Civil Rights...
- Child Support Enforcement
- Protect Your Children with a Child Support Order
- Ohio Child Support : Things You Need to Know
- How to Ensure You Get Your Child Support Payments
- Is your child worth $200 or $20?
- Nobody should ever deny visitation due to lack of payment of child support!




2 Comments
Post a CommentYou have read mine, and I have read yours. There are things I do not agree with. Obviously laws are different in each state. I am a custodial parent, and have raised three children on my OWN. I did not receive any child support because the father "Chose not to work" and ended up living off his parents and the system. Living in low income places, receiving assistance, yet I worked three jobs, was required to provide transportation to and from the Non-custodial parents dwelling, often purchasing food and clothing for my children each time they went to their fathers, and in the end, therapy for my children because of the situation at the non-custodial parents' place. Yet, by law, I was REQUIRED to do this because otherwise I would have been held in NEGLECT. How was this right. I know I am not the only one out there with a situation like this. "Childrens best interest" I think that whom ever has custody should share in the living expenses. Like you said these children weren't ma
Very interesting and well presented article!!