In 1848, gold was discovered in California. Thousands of people, chiefly from the Northern states, joined the gold rush. In a few months some 80,000 of them had settled in the mining region.
To maintain order in these settlements, an established government was needed. California asked to be admitted to the Union as a "free state" one which would not permit slavery. The United States, however, had entered the war with Mexico largely to satisfy the South, since the South wanted new territory which could be divided into slave states.
Throughout the South protest meetings were held. The Northern states were equally insistent that slavery should not be extended. All but one Northern state legislature demanded that Congress should ban slavery in the new territory.
Civil war seemed inevitable when Henry Clay offered a compromise, proposing that each side yield something in the dispute. The North should allow New Mexico and Utah to organize as territories with no mention of slavery and give the South a stronger fugitive slave law.
The South should accept California as a free state and allow prohibition of slave trade in the District of Columbia. In the boundary dispute between Texas and the federal government, the Santa Fe region was to be ceded to New Mexico territory for compensation to Texas.
All spring and during the summer of 1850 a fight over these measures was waged in Congress. Clay won the support of influential Union men, including Stephen A. Douglas and Daniel Webster.
In Webster's famous Seventh of March speech, he declared that slave labor could never be profitable in New Mexico and that the North would lose nothing by granting this concession. He felt that it was not necessary to bar slavery by law of Congress; it was already excluded by "the law of nature."
After a fight of eight months, Webster and Clay secured the passage of the laws that are known as the Compromise of 1850, or Omnibus Bill. This measure did not prove, as Webster had hoped, "a finality that would give peace to a country long distracted by the quarrel over slavery." It merely postponed the Civil War for ten years.
Published by Kent Hadley
A writer of the true and untrue. A teller of tales and sharer of recipes. A political addict. A husband, father, grandfather, dog friend, traveler, roamer, and person liker. A Bear's fan, Buck's fan, Badger... View profile
- Moral Arguments Regarding Slavery with the Missouri Compromise and Compromise of 1850When the Constitution was drafted slavery was not discussed for the fears that discussing such a matter would destroy the country before it even began... Nevertheless... Congress would begin a series of epic legal bat...
- The Life of Millard FillmoreMillard Fillmore was a member of the Whig party. He served one term as the thirteenth president of the United States. The biggest problem during Fillmore's presidency was slavery. He helped pass the Compromise of 1...
- The Growth of Sectionalism Before the Civil WarA look at the impact of the Compromise of 1850 and how it facilitated the coming of the American Civil War.
- Economic Factors That Contributed to the Adoption of the Slave PracticeHow much did slave contribute to the economy of the South or to the national economy? How did the rapid expansion of the country through the Louisiana Purchase and the end of the Mexican-American War aggravate the sl...
- The Compromises of America's Government in the 1800sCompromise was an important part of America's government.
- Sectional Interest During and After the Mexican War
- The Status of Slavery Prior to the Civil War
- Sectional Compromise Over the Issue of Slavery
- The Civil War... Inevitable?
- Andrew Jackson and Rhetorical War with the Bank of the United States
- The Compromise of 1850: Pushing Off Civil War
- Did the Compromise of 1850 Delay the Breakup of the Union, or Did it Actually Crea...
- A sharply divided congress is not new to the U.S.
- A compromise can be worked even with extremists on each side.
- The U.S Civil War was not to be stopped by an act of Congress.



