The first suggestion is to revamp voting rights; overturn one man (or woman), one vote. We should have a vote that is weighted, perhaps a point for every tax dollar paid? So, if you pay $50,000 in federal taxes, your Presidential vote counts 50,000 points. If you pay $1,000, your vote is 1,000 points.
If you're among the 40 percent who remit no tax money, sorry.
In the formative decades of our nation, only the landowners voted. And, yes, only the male, white land owners, but my proposal does not discriminate according to race or gender. It's more of a pay to play system and, admittedly, there are details to work out, such as husbands and wives filing jointly splitting their points.
State and local elections would need their own voting qualifications, be it income, payroll, or property taxes.
Pardon me for forgetting who foretold hundreds of years ago that "a democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It only lasts until the people realize they can vote themselves a largesse from the public treasury."
I believe it was the French philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville who said that, one of his thoughtful observations circa 1830. But while not finding that exact remark at BrainyQuote-dot-com, Tocqueville indeed said something similar:
"The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money."
He also said:
"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."
Memo to Nancy Pelosi...and Barney Frank, Harry Reid, and the darling of ACORN, President Barrack Obama.
It was not the Frenchman but Thomas Jefferson who warned:
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
We have the technology to make this voting system function. Unfortunately, we have existing laws on which a lot of non-tax-paying voters can weigh in.
Constitutional amendments take three-fourths of the state legislatures, or three-fourths of the Congress to ratify. Afterward, they require Justices who don't pervert their intent, which is another tyranny to fear.
This formidable task is worth the pain and agony of pursuing. In fact, "we the people" should perfect our amending skills. Here is the second suggestion:
Disband Washington.
With today's technology, our supposed "representatives" can telecommute. This will keep them away from the parties and the backrooms, and enable them to serve at much lower tax-payer salaries. It will also keep them integrated into the communities that elected them.
In fact, we should put them into a virtual fish bowl, monitoring everything they do.
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." - Jefferson.
Now, if we can accomplish nothing else, print a copy of this, note your agreement and send it to your elected representatives.
Published by Terry Duschinski
Terry Duschinski is a former journalist, who entered corporate marketing, and the launched an entrepreneurial pursuit in the fitness industry. A one-time political campaign aide, he also keeps a keen eye on... View profile
SarahPAC: Sarah Palin 2012 President Bid Begins as a Political Action Co...Is it too early to say "Sarah Palin for president in 2012"? Sarah Palin doesn't think so. On Tuesday, January 27, Sarah Palin announced the formation and launch of SarahPAC. Mon...- Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani Lead Poll of Conservative Political Action ConferenceMitt Romney, former governor of Massachusetts, and Rudy Giuliani, former mayor of New York City, finished first and second in a straw poll of conservatives who attended CPAC. Kansas Senator Sam Brownback was third, f...
Political Action Committee Needs Support to Continue WorkGovernment agencies are taking money away from entrepreneurs, or giving small businesses low dollar work, hindering the Gulf Coast region's ability to fully recover. - What is a Political Action Committee (PAC)?PACs are evil. Plain and simple. Like all special interest groups, they exist to undermine democracy. There is a way to end their malevolent influence, however.
- Public Opinion and Political Action Q&AQuestions and Answers about political participation, conservatives vs. liberals, polls, and minority groups in the American political and economic sphere.
- The Cure May Be Worse Than the Disease
- Bioethics Vs. The Bible: Parents Who Rely on Faith Instead of Medicine
- Dr. Benjamin Rush - Little Known Founding Father
- The Death of President William Henry Harrison
- How to Obtain Political Action Committee (PAC) Status
- Downsize DC Breaks Down Norms of Political Action Committees
- How to Target the Methods of a Political Action Commitee (PAC)




2 Comments
Post a CommentI went back and read some more. Affirmative Action- I was employed at Xerox in 1972 as you know%252C when a memo-hardcopy came to every office and was diseminated that stated all promotions were off%252C end game. Corporate would comply with AF and promote%252C I swear Women and Blacks. A new ranking system was employed and I quit.
-how many other. Thanks for posting%252C I must have missed it before.