The Da Vinci Code: A Dud?
My husband and I just saw The Da Vinci Code. We went to see an entertaining popcorn movie, not a great work of art. He liked The Da Vinci Code on those terms; I didn't. I had read the book; he hadn't. But he was able to easily summarize the main points of the plot and maybe that's part of the problem.
I must confess that I have a problem with the whole Da Vinci code phenomenon. I found the book mildly entertaining, not the world shaking best seller it has turned out to be. I'm puzzled by all of this. Maybe it's because we all love a conspiracy and one involving the Catholic Church is especially juicy. Some Christians may enjoy the scandal of having their beliefs challenged and non-Christians may enjoy the zings to Christianity.
The Da Vinci Code also makes us feel clever and smart.
I don't think I'm giving anything away when I say that the main thesis of the Da Vinci Code, both the book and the movie, is that Jesus married Mary Magdalene, and they had a child. Neither the book nor the movie offers very convincing proof of this but we can suspend disbelief. If we care about this, the movie will be more entertaining. I don't care. My husband enjoys zings to Christianity, which may explain his greater enjoyment of the movie.
The Da Vinci Code the movie is easily understood by non-readers of The Da Vinci code the movie because it takes great pains to explain things. And it explains and explains and explains. We get pretty ordinary chase scenes followed by long stretches of exposition. Plod, plod, plod. Even the ending was an anticlimax that inspired the composer of the sound track to really pull out all the stops in an attempt to rescue the thing. I'll bet most viewers became very aware of the sound track at the end, because the ending was so lame.
Even Tom Hanks can't save The Da Vinci Code. And Audrey Tautau was downright awful, but then she didn't have much to work with. The albino monk was good and the almost pornographic love the camera had for his scenes of self-flagellation was at least interesting.
The Da Vinci Code is not an entertaining popcorn movie. The need for exposition makes it borrring. Read the book if you must.
Published by sandra bell
icon photo by Elvis Santana View profile
- The Da Vinci Code: A Review of the Most Controversial Film of the YearThe Da Vinci Code novel by Dan Brown created a huge controversy with its thoughts on Jesus and Mary Magdalene. The movie version lives up to fans' expectations, although you shouldn't expect a direct translation from...
- The Real History Behind The Da Vinci Code by Sharan NewmanThe Da Vinci Code is one of the more controversial books of all time, for all that it is a work of fiction. But how much of it is based on historical fact, and how much on fiction. Sharan Newman explains in this easy...
- Why I Won't Watch The Da Vinci CodeOn May 19, 2006, the most anticipated movie of the year, "The Da Vinci Code," will premier, staring Tom Hanks, with Ron Howard as the director. No doubt millions of people will line up with eager anticipation to see t...
- Cracking The Da Vinci Code A Speculative Peek at 2006's First Summer BlockbusterWill the first summer blockbuster of 2006, The Da Vinci Code, be wonderful or horrible? Informed speculation follows.
- The Da Vinci CodeAs an avid fan of word games and puzzles it should come as no surprise that amongst my favorite movies is The Da Vinci Code. The movie, directed by Ron Howard, is based on the book of the same name by best-selling aut...
- The Da Vinci Code Movie Review
- Da Vinci's Movie Debut: The Da Vinci Code is Actually a Good Movie..
- The Da Vinci Code: Decoden and Broken
- The Da Vinci Code Dazzles the Box Office
- Review of the Da Vinci Code
- The Da Vinci Code Compromise
- Fiction or History? The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown - a Book Review
- In The Da Vinci Code Jesus marries Mary Magdalene.
- The Da Vinci code has lots of boring expositiion.
- The Da Vinci Code stars Tom Hanks.