Newspapers used to be gold. They were the source of information for busy Americans eager for news from war fronts, from Wall Street, and from Washington. Papers were peddled on the street and sold in bundles to companies for distribution. The subways, busses, and trains were filled with commuters holding broadsheets. Morning editions and evening editions ran splashy headlines, and fierce competition among the major outlets made for interesting, engaging reads.
With the advent of the Internet--and more recently Web 2.0 media--the population is abandoning this source--favoring the click over the leaf. Blogs have intensified this movement. When news stories are breaking, some websites offer minute by minute updates on blogs. News junkies couldn't be happier.
This change is forcing drastic change. Major news outlets like The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times are cutting their workforces by as much as 30%. Reporters are being laid off in droves, copy men and women are dropping off, and editors are slashing paper sections in favor of online coverage. This decline is two-fold: first, the collapse of the economy has led advertisers to tighten their budgets and prioritize their efforts. Second, the need for immediate sources of news is growing exponentially. Daily news is no longer current.
The advertising problem is major. Papers have relied on strong revenues from major companies that push their products and services. Ad executives have realized the strategic advantage the Internet has over traditional media sources. Banners on websites are interactive, lively, and flat-out fun. With the use of cookies and Internet marketing, consumers are targeted with breathtaking accuracy. Site-specific marketing and email campaigns have ramped up profits for ad companies. In a complex and demanding market, the black and white ad has lost its appeal.
The immediacy problem is cultural. News is getting faster, ads are getting smarter, and consumers are losing time. Many Americans now work over 40 hours per week and are unable to sit down and read an entire newspaper cover to cover. Instead, they rely on RSS feeds to prioritize their interests. RSS feeds are the grim reapers for newspapers. Instead of relying on professional, engaging journalism customers are more interested in the sound bite, the flashy headline, the quick fix. In order to reverse this issue, newspapers are going to have to go against the grain and continue to promote progressive and intelligent journalism as king.
In a way, newspapers will not be able to recover fully from this transition. All major papers are available online--a measured response to this transition. But, in order for the presses to continue running, Americans are going to have to slow down in general, not just in their consumption of news.
Published by SDH
Sam Holder is a professional freelance writer. He has been published in The Tallahassee Democrat and The Association of Jewish Refugees Journal. When he is not writing he is devouring Hunter S. Thompson, eat... View profile
- The Collapse of MoralityHave the values of this world gone too far amok? Is it too late to reverse this collapse of morality in our culture and society? Is another world possible?
- The Effects of America's Involvement in South America During the Cold War EraThe paper explores how America shaped and influenced the governments of South America during the Cold War Era using economic policy, the C.I.A, and political pressures.
- The Influence of the Media in Politics, Campaigns and ElectionsWhile the public demands information from the media, there is also an underlying cynicism against the media and politicians. What is often missed is the influence the government has on the media, and equally, the infl...
Is the Internet Bad for Writing? Two Articles Debate the Effects of the...In Phillip Elmer - Dewitt's, "Bards of the Internet", he promotes a new generation of writers in contrast to David Rothenberg's piece on "How the Web Destroys the Quality of Stu...- The Beginning of the End for the GreenbackAnalysis piece from late spring 2008 on the perilous state of the American dollar and what the future holds for the U.S. currency.
- Book Review: Romance of the Three Kingdoms
- The Journalists of Hurricane Katrina
- The History of Punk Rock Music
- Mikhail Gorbachev: Changing the World
- The Globalization of America
- A Day in the Life of a Methamphetamine Addict
- Housing Guide: The Basics of Interpreting and Signing a Lease Agreement




2 Comments
Post a CommentAs to the point about online being better or not....no, I don't think it is better. Look at all the magazines which got put onto microfiche. The original look and feel of the magazine was often lost. Ouch!
Excellent points. Yes, I think newspapers may be dying out. The Christian Science Monitor has now gone completely online and I've been keeping track of the Atlantic Monthly's online version compared to the monthly issue. When they featured Brittney Spears on the cover, I sensed a certain desperate attempt to maintain readership of the magazine. They also got rid of fiction. Newspapers and magazines are making some tough decisions but is it enough to sustain them in print, especially during a recession?