Changes in rulers frequently led to harm in the economy. Many emperors enforced higher taxes although many citizens lacked jobs to pay their debts. Much of the funds received by the government were being spent on items that weren't particularly important, such as the church. These projects were well constructed, however they raised taxes on common folk, particularly western Romans. Yet the constant shift in leadership could not re-boost the economy to previous levels. Weak emperors allowed roads to decay which hurt the trade market. Meanwhile, the taxes set of a series of civil wars, which harmed Rome's resources even further.
The government lacked military control as well. Unlike most other ancient and modern societies, the government did not have enough funds to pay the soldiers enough for their services, which in effect drained their loyalty. As a result of high taxes, soldiers often paid little attention to fighting and spent their time trying to extort money from civilians. With the little money the government did put into the military however, they spent it on foreign soldiers. These mercenaries were not citizens, yet did get paid to fight for the Romans. The government also put little attention into training the army, which created a lack of protection for the empire's lands. In addition, taxes were raised even more due to the costs of the civil war, which left the army unable to afford powerful weapons. The outnumbered Roman foot soldiers were crushed by chariots of Germanic tribes.
The government was also responsible for the social communication problems as well. Internally, there was a lack of communication between officials to begin with. Often, wise men at the center of government were unaware of the state's problems and therefore were unable to fix them. Externally, people did not participate in the Roman government, and therefore government could not address the problems. For example, social issues regarding slave labor and unemployment were not forwarded to government officials. As a result, more and more people lost their jobs to slaves, and the government could do nothing about it.
Despite lack of control over the military, tax issues, and lack of communication, the leading political cause of the fall of Rome was the sudden changes of unorganized leadership. In a 100 year period of chaos and disorder, over 25 leaders took control of Rome. These emperors served brief terms, and then were either assassinated or died from disease. Then another ruler and his group of noble followers would take control and would often lose power quickly. At one point during these shifts in power, the position of emperor was put up for auction-the winner was Marus Julianus. However, his term was brief, and was assassinated after two months. Furthermore, unlike Roman golden ages, the administrations had little power, and most of the power was held by the emperor.
The collapse and eventual fall of the Roman Empire was due to the overwhelming political issues. After the Pax Romana, no Roman ruler could maintain the throne long enough to keep Rome at its greatest heights. Government officials lost contact with not only the citizens, but themselves as well. High taxes arose from Civil Wars and misplacement of funds to the point that most citizens were unable to pay them. As a result, the government lost control of the army, as training funds and soldier salaries declined. The combination of these political issues left Rome weakened and unprotected. Hence, Germanic attacks and Barbarian intrusions from 407 BC left Rome in pieces, and the Roman Empire was no more.
Sources
Pearson Books World History: Connections to Today
Survey Edition
Pearson Books World History: Connections to Today
The Modern Era Edition
Pearson Books World Geography: Building a Global Perspective
Published by No Name
No Info View profile
- Comparing the Future Demise of America with the Roman Empire If anyone knows anything about history, they know at least a little bit of the Roman Empire. I do not know the names and dates of this history, but I do know the general direction that the Roman Empire took from its r...
- The Role of Female Characters in Titus Andronicus and MacbethAn examination of the roles of female characters in Shakespeare's tragedies: Titus Andronicus and Macbeth.
The Roman Empire: A Phrase Used by Historians, not Romans of the TimeThe steps Augustus and the Julio-Claudian Dynasty took in establishing the Roman Empire out of the Roman Republic.- Meet Charlemagne, the Founder of the Holy Roman EmpireCharlemagne founded one of the major empires of history: the Holy Roman Empire. Learn a little more about him in this article.
- The Pax RomanaWhat and How Did The Pax Romana Affect Everyone?
- 9/11 and the Fall of the Roman Republic
- Learning About Ancient Rome
- The Fall of the TV Guide Empire
- A Proposal for a Film About the End of the Roman Republic with an All-star Cast
- Why Should Our Students Study the Roman Empire?
- The Fall of Rome and The City of God by St. Augustine
- The Causes of the Cold War

3 Comments
Post a Commentsorry I didn't read the text properly
I said current not long long time ago
this was very intersting and helpful. :)