There have been similar bans imposed in Italy, Ireland, and Norway. In 2007, Britain plans to ban smoking in restaurants and pubs, except for those pubs that do not serve food. There is some speculation that it will have very little effect because, the Spanish law is quite liberal when compared with other European countries.
In a government-sponsored poll back in November, more than 77% of the people backed the ban on smoking. But 69% of the people polled believe the ban will be hard to enforce. When asked why they believed it would be so hard to enforce they answered: whoever makes the law, makes a loophole. The Spanish hotel federation has pointed out that 90% of small bars are continuing to allow their costumers to smoke. There is also much disagreement over what is considered a workplace. There have been many calls to the health ministry from people wanting to know where they can smoke. A small cafeteria located inside a government building ended its initial ban after many of its regulars quite coming to eat there. There may be very little change for the determined smoker and most Spanish bars will probably stay full of stale cigarette smoke.
This is a very important decision the government has made, although a lot of people may think that a ban on smoking in public places is not a very big deal. Smoking has a very large impact on the economy and health of a society. If cigarettes are banned, does the economy falter a little bit? Would it cause people to lose jobs or lose some of those important tax dollars? Even if some of these things happened a country could benefit so much from the positives that could come from it. There would probably be a large reduction in people breathing in second-hand smoke. That being said, one would have to figure out a way to enforce the ban, and this could prove very tough. People are going to smoke; there is no question about that. The question is how to keep non-smokers safe from second-hand smoke, but allow people who do smoke the available places to light up when they need to.
"Smoking in Spain." The Economist 21-27 Jan. 2006, 51.
Published by Jacob Horn
Bachelor of Arts in History and M.Ed. from Freed-Hardeman University. Interned in Washington D.C. under U.S. Congressman Marion Berry. Served as Team Leader for the Tennessee Youth Conservation Corp at Pic... View profile
- Banning Second Hand Smoke Could Save Thousands of Lives Each Year While many U.S. cities have banned smoking in public places such as restaurants, much can still be done to decrease second hand smoke exposure in public areas, and such efforts could save thousands of lives each year.
-
Should There Be Smoking Bans in All Homes Because of Third Hand Smoke?
The types of smoke in our environment are now expanding as household terms with third-hand smoke being the newest. It's also the best argument in giving up smoking, even in the...
-
Third-Hand Smoke Debate Reveals Dangerous Lack of Common Sense Fueled by...
Third hand smoke is in the news as a relatively new term; you know that cigarette smoking is bad for you, and second hand smoke has been indicated to cause lung cancer. What abo...
-
The Effects of Second Hand Smoke
Secondhand smoke contains more that 4,000 substances, several of which are known to cause cancer in humans or animals. It also causes immediate discomfort and to non smokers.
- Solution for Rising Health Care Costs: Ban Smoking Smoking costs our health care industry $75.5 billion each year, it's time we took a stand.
- 10 Lost Spoilers Season Four Episode Three: The Economist
- Information About the Ban on Smoking in Some States
- The Economist Endorses Obama, Lambastes McCain
- Why Ban Smoking in Public Places?: Arguments in Favor
- Lost Episode 4:03 "The Economist" Review
- Why the United States Needs to Ban Smoking in All Public Places
- Ban Smoking in NC Public Places