The Libertarian and far, far right wing mindset continues to tout that if the government would not overly-regulate or control corporate entities prices would be lower, and American ingenuity would reign in this country once more. Their argument continues that the courts are there if there are any disputes or citizen complaints in the event these entities fail to live up to their marketing ploys, and accessible to the citizens for redress of any grievances they might have with them. I don't feel at this point in our history it is as simple as that. I don't know if you have ever been involved in a case where you are fighting a corporate entity, or the stamina and costs it takes to even use our state or federal courts anymore, not to mention even attempt to find an ethical attorney to represent you since most law firms are now "corporately" owned.
This answer may have been true if way back when the U.S. Supreme Court again hadn't overstepped it's boundaries in redefining the Constitution, and progressively over the years first creatively inventing another entity to the Constitution, "corporate personhoods," and then progressively giving them equal and even greater privileges and immunities and First Amendment protections than the actual "legal" personhoods, U.S. citizens. This is even more true on the state levels, where a new type of corporation has been allowed to do business in most states throughout the nation, the "LLP," or Limited Liability Partnership. How you can be allowed to incorporate, and then attempt to essentially "limit your liability" to others through the corporate structure to begin with, is truly a mystery to me. Now we are attempting to bypass personal accountability and responsibility by hiding behind a sham corporate structure. And the states are allowing this, both through the state legislature and unequal privileges now given them, and then also through that other now political check and balance, errant judicial rulings upholding these corporate structure's "protections" and the state statutes affording them these illegal no mea culpa "umbrellas."
What is needed is removal of that creative phantom entity given First Amendment rights, and also breaking up the monopolies and associations that then sprung up once they were given "freedom of association." It is the Association of Realtors, Insurers, Home Builders,Banks,Bar and Medical which are dictating market place pricing - and woe to the independent entrepreneur that takes on these giants or attempts to fairly price their product or willingly reduce their profit margins to reasonable levels and undercut them.
I don't know what planet the Libertarians have been living on the last few decades, but much more needs to be done than simple deregulation of some of our major industries if we ever truly want to have a free market again. The monopoly problem, "corporate personhoods," and price fixing due to Bill of Rights "association" also needs to be tackled, before our economy can once again recover. Now, those laws and "privileges" are making more and more Americans homeless, as is what is now occurring in the banking and real estate "monopolies." Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, after all, according to some reports, backed and held over 80% of the mortgage market in this country, in one form or another, whether by directly financing those loans, or indirectly through other banking institutions.
Published by Betsy Ross
Former legal professional and long time resident of the State of Arizona. Have written numerous articles for publication with respect to private property rights, immigration and Constitutional issues. View profile
- The Advantages of Using a Mortgage CalculatorThere are variables that help define the terms of a mortgage: The loan amount, the length of loan, credit history, and interest rate all affect whether a lender extends a loan offer, and what rates will apply. A mortg...
- A Ft. Collins Mortgage Broker ReviewNeed a mortgage broker in the Ft. Collins area? I was an appraiser for a lender in the area and I'll tell you why he's the man to call if you're looking for...
The Mortgage Refinancing Boom As mortgage interest rates continue to increase, mortgage refinancing such as second mortgages and reverse mortgages have become increasingly popular among homeowners.
- Mortgage Loans - Where to Find One
- LTV: How Your Loan-to-Value Ratio Can Help You Get Approved for a Mortgage Loan
- What is a Reverse Mortgage?
- Should I Take Out a Second Mortgage?
- How to Get that House Sold in Our Cooling Market
- Pros and Cons of an Interest-Only Mortgage (Smart Choice)
- Mortgage Rate Refinancing




3 Comments
Post a CommentHello Ms. Ross, thank you for your article. Most of what you are complaining about wouldn't exist in a truly free market. The idea of a corporation, that is the liability free side of it, is contrary to free enterprise, since the primary regulating forces are profit/loss incentives. There is no such thing as a natural monopoly. Additionally, libertarians(lower case = NOT the political party; it's the doctrine of non-aggression) are not right-wing conservatives since to be conservative is to resist change. In the current state of affairs I would call us radicals with opinions based on a strong foundation of economic and philosophic principle. Lastly, I doubt your article would go over anyone's head since you didn't use any theory or evidence of any kind, very distasteful remark. I recommend reading some literature on economic principle before you bash the free market as a concept; "Man, Economy, and State" by Murray N. Rothbard would be a good choice. Take care.
And also in removing the unlawful extention of "corporate personhood" Bill of Rights to these corporations. Corporations are property, not people - and have been given privileges and immunities in many states far over those of the citizens - if you read the federal and state statutes, all those "corporate favoring" statutes are unconstitutional on their face.
I have a feeling the article went over your head somewhat.
Actually, the point of the article was in going back to the Constitutional protections. In other words, if foreign labor and products were taxed as they were intended to be, than domestic products would be less expensive. That was how the founders intended to protect American jobs, labor and production, and how wealth was to be built up in this country.
And sorry, every citizen only has his own labor to "sell," so I guess you are against getting the best possible wage you can get for YOUR labor? I would imagine you are a protectionist also, unless you work for free.