Democratic Party: William Clinton (Arkansas) and Albert Gore (Tennessee)
Republican Party: George H.W. Bush (Texas) and Dan Quayle (Indiana)
Independent: Ross Perot (Texas) and Admiral James Stockdale (California)
Election Results:
Clinton/Gore: 370 electoral votes, 44.9 million popular votes
Bush/Quayle: 168 electoral votes, 39.1 million popular votes
Perot/Stockdale: 0 electoral votes, 19.7 million popular votes
Summary:
The election of George H.W. Bush in 1988 guaranteed some stability in dealing with major foreign policy issues on the horizon. The Reagan administration's attempts to drown the communist world with big ideas and a massive defense spending increase set the table for the fall of Soviet Russia in the early 1990s. The Bush administration oversaw the defeat of communism and ushered the new Russian state, led by Mikhael Gorbachev, into a capitalist era. This was the major global change that occurred at this point but Bush and his advisors were more integral to other conflicts throughout the world.
In 1989, the murder of an American soldier in Panama led to the invasion of the small country, under the guise of Operation Just Cause, in order to capture dictator Manuel Noriega. What may have been seen by some as an overreaction to the death of a soldier but showed Americans that Bush would not let their armed forces be bullied by dictators and thieves. An extension of this lesson came with the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait the following year, in an attempt to recapture land they claimed belonged to Iraq. The United States headed up a coalition effort to remove Iraqi soldiers from Kuwait. President Bush was one of the most active coalition building presidents in the 20th century, building a broad front against Iraq. The United Nations proved to be a strong vessel for cooperation from nations throughout the world against Saddam Hussein and surrounding Arab nations, encouraged with support by Bush and allies, admonished the Iraqi effort. The success of the Gulf War for America and its allies showed the strength of President Bush's abilities in foreign affairs and he received massive popular support in the middle of his term.
However, as the 1992 presidential election loomed large on the United States, the economy was failing to fulfill the promise of 1980s prosperity. Bush's focus on foreign affairs, the ending of the Cold War, and Bush's role in the end of the Cold War did much to bring an end to his presidency. While he was successful in Panama and Iraq, he was seen as a relic of a time past, of the Cold War that was now resolved in favor of the West. The 1992 election promised to be a difficult one for the Republican Party.
The Democratic Party nominated dark horse candidate Bill Clinton, who was former governor of Arkansas and a player within the Democratic National Committee. Clinton faced obstacles in the general campaign, including allegations of infidelity (which he addressed in a nationally televised interview) and of dodging the military draft during the Vietnam War. But Clinton's resilience, which would become his trademark as president, stymied the Republican effort to discredit him. Clinton's campaign hammered away at the failed Bush administration economic policy and his broken promise not to raise taxes.
Clinton won a plurality of the popular vote and twice as many electoral votes as President Bush. Bush received the lowest popular vote percentage of a sitting president since Herbert Hoover's loss in 1932 because of the third party candidacy of H. Ross Perot, a billionaire Texan who ran as an independent. Perot, whose "United We Stand, America" platform included a balanced budget and complete honesty in government, appealed to Americans on the right and in the middle who were worried about supporting a dishonest Bush or a questionable Clinton. Perot received 19% of the popular vote, but did not receive any of the electoral votes. Numbers wise, the Perot share of the popular vote would have been enough to push Bush over the edge if Perot was not in the race. However, it is questionable whether Perot's absence would have led to some 19 million people to vote for Bush or to stay at home in protest of Bush's failure on the home front.
Published by Nicholas Katers
Nicholas Katers is a graduate of University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (BA, 2003) and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (MA, 2007) in History and currently a freelance writer. You can find his work in the In... View profile
President Bush Honors George WashingtonPresident Bush paid his first visit to Mount Vernon this week, perhaps in response to Mount Vernon Executive Director James Rees's published charge that neither he nor President...- World War II, International Institutions and Cold War PoliticsThe twenty-five years following World War II symbolize all the political institutions of an international warfare without the actual combat.
President Bush: Is America Going Broke?It has been said that President Bush is attacking America like he has a common cold. Could he be the star that has America falling down, and could America be a third world count...
Eagle Forum Urges President Bush to Pardon Border GuardsThe Eagle Forum, a pro-family organization is urging President Bush to pardon US Border Patrol agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, who are now serving 11- and 12-year long pr...- Predictions for 2008: Foreign Affairs EditionIt is now time for the foreign affairs edition of predictions for 2008. As with the political and movies editions, we approach the matter in the spirit of often in error, but never in doubt.
- Social Security Reform - President Bush: Redistribute If You Want to Privatize!
- President Bush: I Thank You
- Cold War Space Race: US vs USSR
- Republican Party's Future is Grim
- The Cold War is Hot Again
- President Bush's New Threat: Black Magic
- President Bush: "What Are You Thinking?"



2 Comments
Post a CommentFrankly, Perot voters were people who wouldn't have come out to vote in the first place because they were frustrated and apathetic about the American political system. Third party voters rarely fit into neat categories like Democrat and Republican and many would be inclined to stay out of voting for the lesser of two evils.
People didn't vote for Perot as an alternative to Clinton. If they'd wanted Bush as President, they would have voted for him. If Perot hadn't run, the Clinton landslide would have been not only a true mandate (unlike Bush's imaginary mandate of 51% in 2004), but historical.