The Evil of Islamist Intolerance
In a free society, every man has the essential right of property: to use his possessions as he sees fit. From this property right, an absolute freedom of expression can be derived: the mind and mouth of every man are his property. A free society must allow him to think and say what he will without fear of violent retribution. If a man follows a religion, he ought to be allowed to act accordingly. If, however, his mind has reached conclusions critical of a particular religion or of religion in general, he should also be allowed to express them publicly. This right extends to the owners of newspapers, who ought to be allowed to publish whatever they desire. Every theist and atheist has the legal and moral obligation to abstain from coercing those with contrary ideas.
If one dislikes the ideas of another, one should be free to denounce these ideas with words and art. The Danish newspapers that printed the caricatures of Mohammed did precisely this. The cartoonists considered the Islamic prohibition against pictures of Mohammed to be silly and irrational; they thus ridiculed its superstitious nature. Yet they also expressed a much more important truth: that the ideas of Islamic fundamentalism lead directly to the terrorists' horrific bombing attacks. Due to the ubiquity of modern political correctness, far too few people have understood this fact. In defiance of the mainstream, the cartoonists had the heroic courage to pronounce it in public.
People in the Western world should not stoop to respecting the fundamentalists' demands. Islamic fundamentalists are barbarians who want to kill all dissidents against their coercively intolerant ideology. We should send a strong signal to the fundamentalists: civilized people absolutely refuse to tolerate violence against free expression. Let us have no mercy or toleration for intolerant savages. In a genuinely free society, anyone who kills another for religious reasons ought himself receive the death penalty.
Published by G. Stolyarov II
G. Stolyarov II is a science fiction novelist, independent essayist, poet, amateur mathematician, composer, author, and actuary. View profile
- What Church Ought to BeJohn14:21 Jesus says: "Whoever has my commands and obeys them, he is the one who loves me." Now He explains how this fleshes out in the life of the Church.
- Should Naked Statues Be Allowed to Walk Around?Michaelangelo debates with the author regarding the reasons for and against naked art
- How to Read the BibleI argue for a middle position between Biblical literalism and cultural relativism. Making use of Paul's classic argument, I argue that to sacrifice the view of Christ as the one true path is to make Christ's death an...
- The Implicit Decision to Live: The Immorality of Suicide and Forced Termination of...Every person makes a constant implicit decision to live life, as opposed to dying. This essay analyzes the nature of such an implicit decision and why it implies the immorality both of suicide and of the forced termin...
What You Ought to Know About American Idol Season Six AuditionsHere's what you need to know before you head out to audition for America's most popular show - American Idol!
- The Necessity of Capital Punishment to Enforce the Right to Life
- Issues in 2008: Nuclear Proliferation & Islamic Fundamentalism
- The World-wide Resurgence of Religious Fundamentalism
- Islamic Fundamentalism
- Religious Terrorism: Moral Decay, the Army of God and Islamic Fundamentalism
- Reality Television Shows: Should Young Children Be Allowed on Them?
- Should Women Be Allowed to Walk Topless in Public?
1 Comments
Post a CommentYou should see if it's possible to add the offending images to illustrate this article. That's where the media absolutely caved in to the fundamentalists in the name of political correctness and supposed respect for the religiously sensitive.
I'm not always for intentionally offending any group, until I find they do use violence to suppress opposing views. Then I find it necessary to offend them as much as possible because it starts the process of conditioning them to the idea that they can't control freedome of speech. It doesn't matter if they pray, burn down an embassy or even kill, other creative people will fill in the void left behind by any death of a writer or artist. It's time to bring the idea that Allah may not exist into their world, as painful as that might be in shattering their illusions. Christians have to deal with it, why not Muslims?