'The Experiment': Movie Review
Director Paul Scheuring's Remake, Starring Adrian Brody and Forest Whitaker
The instigating, real-life experiment was Philip Zimbardo's controversial 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment. Zimbardo and his research team at Stanford University recruited 24 males to role play prisoners and prison guards for two weeks. This study of human behavior under intense, claustrophobic situations was the source of German author Mario Giordano's 1999 novel, "Black Box." An irresistible thriller with low-budget appeal, German director Oliver Hirschbiegel adapted it for the screen in the 2001 film, "Das Experiment."
In 2002, even the BBC got in on the action, broadcasting a similar documentary, in the vein of reality TV, "The Experiment: the BBC Prison Study." Now, almost forty years after the original Stanford Prison Experiment, American director Paul Scheuring ("A Man Apart," "Prison Break"), released his remake, "The Experiment." With a limited theatrical run (now playing in Denver at the Landmark Mayan theater), "The Experiment" picked up a direct to video deal with Sony Pictures. It's worth a trip to the theater, or picking up a rental, but perhaps the film's most fruitful presence will be in Criminal Justice and Psychology courses.
It is the kind of experiment that stimulates controversy and in retrospect intense academic, even informal debate. The findings of the Stanford experiment and the BBC study varied, thus not reaching a consensus on human behavior. Still, the BBC Prison study was included in course work at Oxford and Cambridge University. Perhaps the American remake of the film will provide the cliff notes, or Spark notes if you're younger than 30, conducive to American classrooms. The research itself falls more towards rhetoric than results, which is tough material to present in a cinematic narrative.
The narrative of Scheuring's "The Experiment," is cut and paste, yet still a satisfying introduction to this fascination with prison studies. If one read the original findings from Zimbardo at Stanford, read Black Box, and topped it off with the BBC and Hirschbiegel's raw cinematic interpretation, the current remake would constitute little more than a shrug. Yet for Scheuring to capture audiences on the tail end of situations like Abu Ghraib, it's a smart film that lights the candle from the other end.
It is truly only a candle of light shed on the decades of debate, studies, controversy and criticism of the American Prison system alone. There are also the centuries of human brutality, power struggles and primal eruptions society is so often stripped down to. In that respect, "The Experiment" is a barely registered synaptic spark on an EEG screen.
At the same time, "The Experiment" strives to capture this bigger picture with an abstractly disturbing barrage of violent imagery in the opening credits. It is imagery that tells us from the start that this is so much larger than a controlled study gone out of control. It is images that stir a primal reminder that we are nothing more than animals kept in check by pacification and sublimation. The film drills deep into this reptilian core of the brain, showing that when reduced to role of captive and subjugator, slave and ruler, prisoner and guard, survival is the only response.
The film's symbolic totems may be simplified, yet provide appropriate visual references to cling to while speculating your own identity in such a scenario. Whether prisoner or guard, the film succeeds in forcing its audience to question the possibility of their own violent tendencies, power trips and submissive breakdowns.
Take for instance the clever casting of Forest Whitaker as one of the volunteer subjects, Barris. Whitaker's Oscar winning role as Ugandan dictator Idi Amin in "The Last King of Scotland" holds tremendous preparation for his role in "The Experiment." We also come to know Whitaker's Barris as a repressed momma's boy, which in cinematic language can only mean one thing; psycho!
Adrian Brody's character, Travis, relies heavily on his back-story as a peace activist with a goal of following a bleeding heart lover to India. Of course India is the home to the poster-boy for pacifism, the iconic Mohandas K. Gandhi. Whether or not audiences pick up on these subtle touches of casting and character development, acknowledging them makes the epic clash between these two characters all the more enjoyable, or disturbing.
It is interesting to note that one of the original research subjects at Stanford was a peace activist who joined the study with subversive motives. Perhaps Brody's character is a nod to this subject, who in the end succumbed to his own identity crises as a prisoner. The most revealing truth behind the film is that the study was cut off after only 6 days. Like some strange religious metaphor for human behavior, the original 24 men could only handle 6 days of the experiment. They were seemingly normal young men, trying to make a buck, who were reduced to primal behavior in less than a week. Though, it is fair to say that anyone with even the slightest Freudian perspective on behavior is not surprised when it takes only moments for the primal scream to consume the cerebral cathedral of illusions we live by.
If you take the findings of the studies and the questions provoked by the films as basis alone for an argument, it's a wonder why the prison system has lasted for centuries. A necessity in matters of safety and justice perhaps, yet this experiment that plays before our eyes in the film, is an everyday reality for millions of prisoners and guards alike. It may only be the cinematic tactics of a thriller, but it's almost unbearable to subject your mind to two hours of this behavior. It truly provokes the question of how we manage to undergo this global experiment called society without tearing each other to pieces.
The Contributor has no connection to nor was paid by the brand or product described in this content.
Published by Jason Cangialosi - Featured Contributor in Arts & Entertainment
The past meets future for Jason in a moment fused by creative experiences in music, writing, film and philosophy providing a nexus of the complex world to come. A freelance creator and ghostwriter of books,... View profile
- Basics of the Stanford Prison ExperimentThis article is a summery of the Phillip Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment. It gives a basic description of how the experiment went and and describes the clothing worn by the guards and prisoners.
A Theory on the Impact of Social Roles on Human BehaviorA paper written for an English class which uses various well known psychological and sociological experiments to make an argument for "social mind control".
Book Review: The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil...Review of the book The Lucifer Effect by Philip Zimbardo, a detailed account of the famed Stanford Prison Experiment, as well as a discussion of its implications for such issues...- Could the Holocaust Happen Again? a French Documentary Proves that it CanA documentary and experiment shows that the holocaust could happen again
- Literature-Based Movies for Vietnam War History: Explore the Conflict Through Lite...Books and films to help students explore and connect with the Vietnam conflict.
- The Human Behavior Experiments Movie Review
- The Stanford Prison Experiment
- The Boundaries of Reality: Examining "The Quiet Rage: The Stanford Prison Experiment"
- The Stanford Prison Experiment: Exploring the Ethical Issues
- Abu Gharib in Comparison to the Stanford Prison Experiment
- The Invalidity of the Stanford Prison Experiment
- The Milgram Experiment and The Stanford Prison Experiment: How Good People Turn Evil





1 Comments
Post a Commentwhat is being missed here is the purpose of Zimbardo's original 1971 study. As a social psychologist he was interested in to what extent human behavior is informed by the roles we find ourselves in. It is in this context that the viewer might want to introspect their own attitudes and everyday choices. Incidentally, the actual experiment was indeed meant to run for 14 days, but had to be terminated after 1 week due to "things getting out of hand";i.e., the subjects identifying too strongly with their assigned role. No one was seriously physically hurt, but things were heating up to the extent that Zimbardo felt it was no longer ethically justifiable to continue the experiment.
Thanks. steffan.omray@gmail.com