The translation of a novel or short story into a movie is not always a smooth ride. Something is always lost and it is not always made up by what it gained. Here are my picks for the five worst movie adaptations:
The Da Vinci Code
Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code was a guilty pleasure for many readers, including me. I was able to look past the stilted and clichéd prose and simply enjoy the story. The movie was hotly anticipated and many A-list actors lined up to audition. Unfortunately for Tom Hanks, he got the role. It was not one of his career's finest moments. The movie was plodding and sleepy and lacked the break-neck pace of the book. Too much explaining and not enough doing.
Maximum Overdrive
This was a hard one for me. I am a rabid Stephen King fan. For the most part, however, his books have not translated well to film. I had hoped for better with this one as he directed it, but it remains one of the smelliest movies ever made. The movie cannot decide if it is a horror flick, a parody or a cartoon. It does none of them well, but I fully expect to see it disseminated in an advanced theatrical course a hundred years from now.
Simon Birch
John Irving's A Prayer For Owen Meany is one of his best books and definitely on my Top Ten list. The story about a dwarfish odd boy who was destined to change history was subtle, humorous and dark; three things that rarely translate well to the big screen. The movie became Simon Birch and morphed into a sappy coming-of-age story about two friends. Without the book's name in the movie credits, you would have a difficult time recognizing the connection.
The Running Man
Can Stephen King be on this list twice? Oh, yes, he can! The Running Man was a big budget adaptation of King's novella of the same name. The movie starred Arnold Schwarzenegger and told the basic story of a man caught for a crime he didn't commit and ends up on a reality TV show to win his freedom. The story is told brilliantly by King and is a satirical indictment of our public thirst for voyeurism. Once the screenwriter got hold of it and pruned it with a chainsaw, it became 101 minutes of Arnie running.
The Handmaid's Tale
Margaret Atwood's futuristic sci-fi book was ground-breaking when it was released. It painted a world where procreation was a privilege, not a right and personal freedoms were a distant memory. The movie version focused more on plot than message and so many brilliant observations were lost in the rush to tell the story of the escape.
Published by Angie Mohr CA CMA - Featured Contributor in Business & Finance and Lifestyle
Angie Mohr is a Chartered Accountant and Certified Management Accountant who has worked with thousands of business clients from home-based entrepreneurs to rock bands to celebrity chefs. She is also the auth... View profile
Fiction or History? The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown - a Book ReviewA review of The Da Vinci Code from a historic point of view.
Mona Lisa - Da Vinci Code in Her EyesAn Italian researcher found hidden numbers and letters in the eyes of the Mona Lisa. Is the Da Vinci Code real?- Cracking >The Da Vinci Code A Speculative Peek at 2006's First Summer BlockbusterWill the first summer blockbuster of 2006, The Da Vinci Code, be wonderful or horrible? Informed speculation follows.
- Exploring The Da Vinci CodeThe DVD is good for seriously devotees of these theories, but fans of The Da Vinci Code might be disappointed that direct connections are not made to the book.
- The Da Vinci Code: A Controversial Film of Mystery and FaithThe Da Vinci Code begins with the murder of the curator of the Louvre Gallery in Paris, France. Thus begins the film adaptation of Dan Brown's controversial potboiler.
- The Top 5 Worst Movie Remakes Ever
- Movie Adaptations of Television Shows at the Theaters in 2009
- Review of the Da Vinci Code
- The Da Vinci Code Movie Review
- The Da Vinci Code Dazzles the Box Office
- Da Vinci's Movie Debut: The Da Vinci Code is Actually a Good Movie..
- A Closer Look at the Da Vinci Code




11 Comments
Post a CommentI think that the worst adaptation of a book that I've ever seen was of Jodi Picoult's "My Sister's Keeper." They absolutely ruined the entire message of the book along with eliminating all of the nuances that made you care about the characters.
I prefer the book over the movie most of the time. Good article.
I read a quote once long ago that has stuck with me ever since: bad books make good movies, and good books make bad movies.
My guess is that it's because good books describe thoughts, feelings and conversations, and movies are just really bad at those three things.
I so agree with you on the King movies! I do enjoy watching the ones he approves, but some of the, Running Man especially, were just awful! (I, too, am a Stephen King freak!)
Loved this article! You are so right about movie adaptations. There have been good ones, but most just don't compare to the books...at least for me! Especially with most Stephen King work. There were only 3 film adaptations from his work that I thought were REALLY on par with the quality of the book. These were: Stand By Me (adapted from King's novella "The Body"), The Shawshank Redemption, and The Green Mile!
I'm with Tony on this. Never read the book, although I like Irving. I loved "Simon Birch." I would submit "Rising Sun" as pop culture and Hollywood inclusiveness getting in the way of a really good Michael Chrichton book about industrial espionage...
wonderful work
Books are almost always better than the movie they inspire, but I still like both.
There are some amazing book to movie adaptations. But I do agree with these five. They fall short of the written versions.
Good job...about the only novel/novelized history exceeded by "its" movie was THE GREAT ESCAPE, but the film of THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF BEING was (surprisingly) good as well....