The GOP Stands for Shafting 99% of the Population Because Our Proles Are Too Ignorant to Stand for Anything Other Than Hatred

.

The man who now holds the best chance against President Obama'"only losing by 42% to 34% right now, Ron Paul is too extreme for even his own party. Ron Paul's desire to eliminate the Department of Energy, Department of Commerce, Department of Education, Federal Reserve and other government elements is too much for most mainstream Republicans. Then there is the fact that he thinks that permitting social service net programs to advance is "just like permitting slavery."



Don't our dear red state proles understand that Medicare is a government program?

The article " Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare! shows how ignorant our red staters are. "

They have been brainwashed, but some of the things they are screaming exhibits appalling lack of knowledge.



The articles states "At the risk of bringing down the digital wrath of blog-savvy oldsters, I've noticed that a considerable number of the anti-reform Republican "hooligans," as Rachel Maddow describes them, who turn up at various town hall meetings to shout incomprehensible loud noises just happen to be senior citizens. And while the old people who turn up to protest health care reform are, to some extent, victims of the usual Republican lies and disinformation , they're still adults and therefore responsible for their opinions, their actions and their ziplock baggies filled with crazy .



Yes, they've been tricked by Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh into believing that health care reform will somehow involve golden-grilled ACORN thugs showing up at bingo with a tray of syringes filled with black liberal death juice. Yes, they've been tricked by Sean Hannity and Lou Dobbs into thinking that this "halfrican American" president with his terrorist pals and Kenyan birth certificate is trying to supplant God's U.S. government with a liberal fascist homocracy.



But failing to grasp the extraordinary contradiction evident in receiving Medicare benefits while simultaneously shouting nonsense about "government-run health care" is quite simply inexcusable."



The article has evidence as it states "President Obama at a town hall meeting last week described a letter he received from a Medicare recipient :

"I got a letter the other day from a woman. She said, 'I don't want government-run health care. I don't want socialized medicine. And don't touch my Medicare.'"



A Republican notes the confusion of our proles as it states "At a town hall meeting held by Rep. Robert Inglis (R-SC):

Someone reportedly told Inglis, "Keep your government hands off my Medicare."


"I had to politely explain that, 'Actually, sir, your health care is being provided by the government,'" Inglis told the Post. "But he wasn't having any of it."


Is it the adage a "sucker is born every minute" or are our red staters victims of Orwellian "doublespeak", or simply that our proles want theirs, but don't want others to get a similar deal?



The article states "Either these people have been so kerfluffled and enraged by the wingnutty "reparations" and "killing old people" lies they're hearing on AM radio that they've forgotten about the source of their current health insurance coverage, or they're fully aware of the fact that they are, indeed, beneficiaries of socialism, but they refuse to allow anyone else to participate in a similar program. You know, because socialized medicine is bad. Except for them."


Ron Paul is a libertarian fanatic so with these right-wingers he is a serious candidate. According to a recent CNN poll, Paul was ranking somewhere in the middle of a vast GOP field that had former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee in first place. However, the same poll, released May 6 but taken before the president's announcement that U.S. Navy SEALs had killed al Qaeda leader Usama bin Laden, showed Paul with the best chance of beating Obama, though he was still seven points behind the president in a head-to-head matchup. His policies are dangerous though to such an extent that you would think his followers had to be victims of the Orwellian "Ministry of Love".



The article " Ron Paul Calls Social Security and Medicare Unconstitutional, Compares Them to '˜Slavery'" clearly shows how Paul's policies would have us reverting to a state we were mired in 150 years ago.



It is a lie that the main tenets of the US social safety net, but he wants to revisit a policy that caused so much brother on brother bloodshed. That is insane.



The article states "Appearing on Fox News Sunday this morning, Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) defended his longstanding view that Medicare, Social Security (and pretty much everything else ) violate the Constitution. At one point, Paul even claimed that letting Social Security and similar programs to move forward is just like permitting slavery."


He was on a dependable right-wing propaganda organ but even his stances befuddled his interviewer who said "Congressman, it's not just a liberal view. It was the decision of the Supreme Court in 1937 when they said that Social Security was constitutional under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution."


This led Paul to say "And the Constitution and the courts said slavery was legal to, and we had to reverse that."

The interviewer, as the article states "As Chris Wallace tries to explain, Paul's crankish view of the Constitution cannot be squared with the document's text . The Constitution gives Congress the power to "to lay and collect taxes" and to "provide for the -- general welfare of the United States," which is exactly what Social Security does."


His hypocrisy confuses the red staters who desperately need to believe in those who would hurt others. The article states "Like so many other Republicans , Paul needs to learn that the Constitution is not some toy that he can take apart and reassemble to force the nation down whatever path he chooses. The Constitution's words actually mean something, and Ron Paul is not free to ignore them."


I don't think Paul is ignorant. He knows that his voters have nothing and want others to suffer and tailors his speeches to appeal to that.


The article " Ron Paul Suggests We'd Be '˜Better Off' Without The Civil Rights Act". This shows Paul's calculus.

Red staters have nothing and they want others to suffer, especially those that they can't relate to.


The article states "Rep. Ron Paul's (R-TX) presidential campaign is already living up to the far-right brand of libertarianism he's come to symbolize for his followers. In one of his first interviews after announcing his 2012 bid yesterday morning, he called for eliminating FEMA , even as much of the country suffers from devastating natural disasters, suggesting that people who happen to be in the path of a tornado or wildfire are "dumb."


But in an an interview just minutes later yesterday evening, Paul outdid himself by telling MSNBC host Chris Matthews that he wouldn't have voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act because it was unfair to property owners. When Matthews asked if Paul thought it should be legal for a store to refuse to serve African Americans, Paul dodged, saying, "that's ancient history."



Chris Matthews interviewed him and as the article states "Let me ask you this. We have had a long history of government involvement with Medicare, Social Security, the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act. And I think you are saying we would have been better off without all that?"



Paul replied with something that Bush 43 couched as being a "compassionate conservative" and Bush 41 portrayed as "1000 points of light". They are just code words for the unfortunate get shafted. What do you think is going to happen to all of the people who are in nursing because of Medicaid if the GOP manages to get Ryan's budget through?



Paul to Chris Matthews's question replied " I think we would be better off if we had freedom, and not government control of our lives, our personal lives, and our '" and policing the world."



Paul is dangerous, but his policies appeal to our proles baser instincts'"consequentially he is a leading candidate for those who have nothing. Unfortunately due to previous GOP administration there are far too many of them.