COMMENTARY | Sugar is the enemy. The root of all evil. Mary Poppins was nothing more than a drug pusher. Sugar causes obesity, heart disease, diabetes and if your health is not a concern, how about an appeal to vanity: sugar also causes wrinkles.
Researchers from the University of California San Francisco published a commentary in the journal Nature stating that sugar and other sweeteners are so toxic that they should be regulated as strictly as alcohol by governments worldwide.
Regulations proposed that would ban sugar sales to those under 18, as well as a complete ban of sales in or near schools. Those who could purchase products containing sugar would be subjected to taxation.
While I agree with the fact that too much sugar is harmful, I cannot fathom how banning sugar would benefit the population at large. In fact, this entire scenario sounds eerily similar to prohibition arguments. Although the people behind this prohibition are not progressive Christians attempting to save society, instead they are progressive scientists are attempting to heal the nation's health problems.
Government action cannot save people from themselves.
Maybe they should take a peak back at how the first prohibition turned out. The irony of that era was that instead of creating a perfect society, where no alcohol was consumed and no one become an alcoholic, it produced one of the most violent, crime-ridden periods in American history according to the Times. To further the irony, during that time in the early 1900s, sugar houses were a valuable resource for illegal breweries. In fact, by 1929, illegal liquor was bringing in a profit of $215 million a year in Detroit, second only to auto manufacturing.
If history means anything, the only people the sugar ban will benefit will be the sugar industry itself.
Taking away freedoms will not create a better society. People will not suddenly see the light when told sugar is toxic. Society as a whole will not suddenly lose weight and get healthy. Those who want to sugar, who choose to eat sugar, will find a way.
Researchers from the University of California San Francisco published a commentary in the journal Nature stating that sugar and other sweeteners are so toxic that they should be regulated as strictly as alcohol by governments worldwide.
Regulations proposed that would ban sugar sales to those under 18, as well as a complete ban of sales in or near schools. Those who could purchase products containing sugar would be subjected to taxation.
While I agree with the fact that too much sugar is harmful, I cannot fathom how banning sugar would benefit the population at large. In fact, this entire scenario sounds eerily similar to prohibition arguments. Although the people behind this prohibition are not progressive Christians attempting to save society, instead they are progressive scientists are attempting to heal the nation's health problems.
Government action cannot save people from themselves.
Maybe they should take a peak back at how the first prohibition turned out. The irony of that era was that instead of creating a perfect society, where no alcohol was consumed and no one become an alcoholic, it produced one of the most violent, crime-ridden periods in American history according to the Times. To further the irony, during that time in the early 1900s, sugar houses were a valuable resource for illegal breweries. In fact, by 1929, illegal liquor was bringing in a profit of $215 million a year in Detroit, second only to auto manufacturing.
If history means anything, the only people the sugar ban will benefit will be the sugar industry itself.
Taking away freedoms will not create a better society. People will not suddenly see the light when told sugar is toxic. Society as a whole will not suddenly lose weight and get healthy. Those who want to sugar, who choose to eat sugar, will find a way.
Published by Sylvie Branch - Featured Contributor in Lifestyle
Creative professional with a triple whammy of job titles; freelance writer, artist, educator. Sylvie was a Rising Star for Y!CN in 2009, was part of the Top 1000 in 2010 and won the Lifestyle award in 2011.... View profile
The (Almost Literally) Complete Guide to Bartending and ServingTrue mixologists will build a drink around one or more of the four basic parts whose flavors they particularly like or are interested in
That's the Spirit(s) - Your Guide to Texas DistilleriesThis article provides you with an overview of distilleries located in Texas and some of the spirits they produce. Helpful links are included.- Minnesota - the Bread and Butter State (From the United States Series)Found on Lake Superior the second northernmost State contains more than 11,000 lakes, the world famous Mall of America, the headwaters of the Mississippi River, and so much more.
A Few Insights on the People, Culture and Cuisine of TurkeyHaving come to Istanbul to study abroad there are many things that are quite different from life in the United States. Turks eat different food, follow a different religion and...- Iced Tea in the United StatesThis article is about the origins of sweet tea in the United States: a delicious look at history.
- Corruption in Prohibition and It's Social, Economic and Legal Hypocrisies
- Corruption in Marijuana Prohibition, and Its Social, Economic and Legal Hypocrisies
- Columbus, Ohio: The Heart of Buckeye Beauty, History, and Culture
- 1920s Wedding Cocktails
- Lessons of History: Alcohol Laws, Perestroika & Unintended Consequences
- The Globalization of Beer
- Secret Behind the Counter at Oregon Liquor Stores

1 Comments
Post a CommentMOST EXCELLENT ARTICLE!