Let me state that for the record, I feel that it is in very poor taste to build a mosque at Ground Zero. However, I do not believe that anyone has the right to stop it from happening, so long as there are no terrorist connections to the parties involved. I mean, that's what we advertise America as, do we not? The bastian of tolerance. The nation of religious freedom. Honestly, we are acting like the country of contradiction.
Not allowing Muslims to erect a prayer center on the site that Muslims attacked, is utterly preposterous. That's like not letting white people on the site where two white guys bombed the Oklahoma City Federal Building. Or not letting Bill Clinton come into contact with women because of his conduct with Linda Tripp. Or not letting Americans tread on the lands that the Native Americans once had taken from them. Completely ridiculous.
To me that's "clique-ism." Bad things happen, both intentionally and through complete ignorance, but they still happen. To label an entire clique for the actions of a small percentage of people belonging to that group is quite an obvious contradiction. It's the same exact monster as racial profiling. But wait, since Muslim denotes a religious affinity and not a race, that must be why this is ok--right? We should also, along those lines, be able to profile on the basis of sexuality, economic status, IQ, or hair color. Sounds to me like a page out of the Third Reich Handbook.
This country as a whole needs to start fighting for everyone inside of it. We need to stop letting our politicians use their devicive drek to make us hate each other. That's the way they keep us distracted from their misdeeds. As a country, we need to start acting as one. Otherwise, we are just a scattered mess of small tribes that will never accomplish anything meaningful again.
In conclusion, while I would tell anyone wishing to put a mosque at Ground Zero that it was in terribly bad taste, I would never say that they cannot. That's because, i guess, that I am just an old-fashioned American. Or because I believe in more freedom and less governmental interference. Or because I still believe in capitalism, not socialism. But not because I am a Muslim or a terrorist.
Published by James White
-
The Next Best Thing: Religious Freedom in America
Religious freedom is usually confused with religious tolerance. In America, we have the idea that we have full religious freedom, but we do not. I will compare Karl Marx, Bruno...
- Thoughts on Religious Freedom We have those who think their religious freedom is being violated if they are not allowed to force their religion down everyone else's throat.
- No Mosque at Ground Zero Building a Mosque at Ground Zero is a bad idea. It will increase tensions between Christians and Muslims and could lead to even more violance. We should work to ease tensions between the two groups.
- Newt Gingrich: Mosque at Ground Zero Shows Hypocrisy Newt Gingrich argues that it is hypocritical to support building a mosque at Ground Zero. And it's not a question of religious tolerance, it's a question of decency.
- Reasons Why a Mosque at Ground Zero is a Bad Idea Not a good idea.
- A Mosque at Ground Zero in New York City: In Opposition
- Opinion on Muslim Mosque Near (not At) Ground Zero: Religious Equality, Religious...
- Mosque at New York City Ground Zero
- A Second Mosque Near Ground Zero? Could Happen!
- Mosque at Ground Zero
- Mosque at Ground Zero: We Are Going Too Far
- Ban the Mosque from Ground Zero ... If You Don't Believe in Justice, that Is!
|
|
- 10 things you need to know today: February 11, 2012 (The Week)
- Grammy Awards preview: Top 5 reasons to watch (The Week)
- No Fun Allowed: L.A. Beaches Ban Footballs, Frisbees, and Sand Digging (ContributorNetwork)
- Good day, bad day: February 10, 2012 (The Week)
- Obama's birth control compromise: 'Still unacceptable'? (The Week)
- We need less governmental interference in private sector business dealings.
- Deviciveness is destroying our country.
- Everyone should have equal rights in America.
2 Comments
Post a CommentI agree to disagree with everyone. The WTC disaster was an awful moment in U.S. history. However, it's time to move on. Obviously nobody is going to do anything about it, so forget it. Idealistic disagreement without preventative action is far from revolutionary. Thomas Paine wrote and fought for America. Andrew Jackson, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, all the same;they all stood up, said no and forcibly changed things. Americans today have all the technology to voice their opinions, however they lack the muster to force their will. That itself is un-American.
James, I like the energy your writing has, but I would like to point out that it isn't a matter of whether they have a right to build. No one, political or otherwise has made that statement. Of course they have the right. You do think it's inappropriate so I assume you are against it as are the others who oppose. It should be a matter of compassion for those who lost loved ones in the WTC. It seems those who want the Mosque haven't the compassion or ability to "put themselves in others shoes". They are too busy defending their ideology.