Nude Beaches, which many call Free Beaches, allow people to come and be free to how they want to dress or not dress in life. Also, public lands/ public nudity advocacy can be very good for those who are protecting their right to walk the world free of clothes, before we were told how we should walk the world, and now even down to how we should dress when it come to be proper. If we as people obey God, then why must we dress in clothing that he did not give us? If he wanted to have clothes then we would have been born wearing them.
Over ninety-nine percent of known existence. Our ancestors lived in communal nudity until loom technology emerged into Asia about 6,000 years ago; clothing wasn't an available option anywhere on the planet unless one was into fur, which of course was a bad choice when it got hot.
The children grew up knowing exactly what their fellow species looked like. Of course, during these times modesty was presumably not an issue, and the thought that someone's naked body being and obscenity would have never even been imaged. So, I think our ancestors look down on us and can't believe how we are acting about wearing clothes and not wearing clothes. Some were taught otherwise, but mostly body acceptance was as natural as life and self acceptance.
Social nudity is an old tradition in the San Francisco Bay Area, before the 18th century invasion of their tribal villages by western civilizations emissaries in military armor, and currical robes, the earliest Californians had lived unashamedly nude in this temperate, coastal climate for over 10,000 years. Their sad experience was a familiar story of colonialism, that is, cultural genocide, including a compulsory cover-up of the naked savages in the name of civilized modesty. Steadily, instilling it into the minds of native people, body shame became an essential element in the conversion and control of the native people. This became and effective in clothing issues in over four centuries in the American's, and in Africa, Australia and also the Pacific Island and most of the rest of the world. Disregarding tropical discomfort, European colonial/religious authorities made wearing clothing the most visible sigh of subservience to the new order. Hawaiian mumu was one such fashionable result.
Social nudity was not always taboo, in Europe. The ancient Greeks found the nude human form both noble and artistically inspiring, competed nude in the Olympics for centuries, and sometimes ever fought wars with new combatants nude.
The Roman's socialized nudity in their public baths, and also nudity was often part of The Pagan Ceremony and the celebration throughout pre-Christian Europe. Though early Christianity cleverly co-opted key pagan holidays and myths to gain acceptance, it denounced the more flexible pagan attitudes about nudity, sexuality, and the human body.
Though faithfully believing in Jesus's second coming was imminent for many centuries after his crucifixion, early Christian leaders tended to be extreme ascetics who closed their doubting minds, rejected their sinful bodies and focused mostly on their spiritual here afters. The "flesh" was seen as an evil temptation, especially if it was female. In the 19th century even to see the ankle of a woman was considered a risqué in a "polite society".
Early in the 20th century, social nudity began its first European comeback since Rome was sacked. "Free Body Culture" in Germany and "Naturalism" in most of Europe, and eventually "Nudism" as it reached American shores in the third decade, the movement's secular idealistic philosophy included non-sexual social nudity, outdoor exercise, a healthy, non-alcoholic, usually vegetarian diet, and a spiritual bond with nature.
Of course, there came private nudist clubs, which are now big time strip clubs. Social nudity finally won the legal right in the late 1950's to publish and mail innocuous nude photos, which then publications were swamped in the marketplace in the 1960's by an explosive growth of unrelated pornography with much more erotic images. Thus, the "Playboy" was born.
Social nudity has driven a bigger issue over the past few years as activist pronounce their views of living in nature the way God intended. Now, Earth is almost polka dotted with destination sites where beaches and resorts allow social nudity.
Published by Laura Frost
Mother of two, hardworker, satisfied and ready to move on in my career as a professional writer. I love writing about history of any type, women, traveling and nature. View profile
- SM Mall of Asia in the Philippines: The Third Largest Mall in the WorldReminiscent me of the famous Landmark Mall in Hong Kong, SM Mall of Asia stuns the global retail industry as it makes it to the top three largest malls in the world.
- "When There is No More Room in Hell, the Dead Will Walk the Earth"One of my original zombie journals that I wrote. This one is from the perspective of one of the special operatives agents that you would see in the beginning of the original Dawn of the Dead.
Who Knew the World of Competitive Giant Pumpkin Growing Could Be so Much...There is something intoxicating about the idea of growing a pumpkin that is upwards of 1,200-pounds. It seems like it is something that I could really get into.- I'll Walk the WorldMy poem on how I want to see the world...
Review for Top of the World Restaurant in the StratosphereSee the city of Las Vegas from new heights, and enjoy a great meal at the same time
- Modern Social Nudity
- The Dawn of American Nudism
- Flashes & Backlashes: A Social Commentary
- Striding Nude, Blue Dress...The Painting of the Wife of Tony Blair
- The Best Nude Beaches in the World
- The Emerging Nudist
- See the World One Mile at a Time

1 Comments
Post a CommentIn modern society, as many groups strive for the right to have their particular interest legally recognized, it is becoming as difficult to ignore social or public nudity as it is to ignore unemployment, poverty or crime. Certain behaviors are simply the default level of existence of which humanity is capable. If a person does not have a job, they are unemployed; whether they seek unemployment compensation is a different matter. If a person does not have clothing or choose not to wear it, they are nude. Finally, if a person is not able to remain gainfully employed and care for themselves or their family, it is likely they will to turn stealing in order to meet those needs. Also, in many areas of society people regard begging as being nearly a criminal activity and it actually is in some places; so what is this saying about us as a caring, compassionate and enlightened society?
Some individuals are choosing to go nude as a political statement and public nudity associated with a politically-oriented slogan or statement is permitted in some areas. Other people are using nudity to attract attention to environmental causes such as "End Dependency on Foreign Oil" or "My Bicycle is a Zero Emissions Vehicle" and participate in the growing number of World Naked Bike Ride (WNBR) events held in major cities around the world.
Teenagers have gone nude in the downtown area of an American city simply because the community had not banned it yet and (apparently) they wanted to test the waters of tolerance and acceptance for this alternative behavior! Was this instance of public nudity only kids being kids or did it have a larger purpose? Did they decide to do it on their own, or where their one or more parents behind them encouraging individualism and a commitment to absolutely doing what they believed to be a human right? (to go naked as they were born?)
As a society we can speculate about different behaviors all day long, and we can also argue the positive and nagative aspects of such things as social nudity, but in the end the important aspect is what we choose to do about it. Should children be told nudity is wrong? Should they be raised in an environment where revealing themselves is regarded as criminal behavior? What does this say about art, modeling, classical painting, sculpture, advertising and attitudes in general?
If a society is OK with forcing their women to cover themselves from head to toe, even though this is at the opposite end of the spectrum, how can it even be open to disucssing SOME peoples' wish to be nude among others? If we permit one extreme, or tolerate it, is there also room for permitting, tolerating and accepting the other extreme? Are not all men and their behaviors created equally and at least entitled to due consideration? I say do not condemn the activity as a whole based on its basic definition, but treat it as we presently treat all other human behaviors! If a nude person is able to go about in society and conduct themselves responsibly and civilly, then they should be allowed to continue. If a person misbehaves while nude or offends people in some other way, then they should be dealt with in the smae manner as if they were clothed; it should not really make a difference.