It is interesting how the debate was moderated and how fast the debate moved, and the direct and pointed questions of Chris Matthews. Mr. Matthews really worked at getting simple "yes" and "no" answers to his questions. He especially used this tactic to get clear answers on whether the 1973 roe v. wade decision should be reversed. The issues ranged from abortion, to immigration, to taxes. Another interesting observation is that Iran and China kept surfacing when it came to oil and military might. All the candidates kept true to the Republican platform of a strong national defense, honoring it and using comparisons ad naseum, to the man's foreign policy in whose library they stood. This is the first debate that auditioned the Flat tax, the Consumption tax and two of the different ways of embryonic stem cell research. The evening was full of funny antidotes and some harsh words from people that we were familiar with. Senator John McCain of Arizona quipped with this powerful statement: "We will capture Osama Bin Laden........ and I will chase him to the gates of hell!"
In comparison to the Democratic Debate it was certainly more entertaining and I have never seen so many Republicans distance themselves from their own president so quickly on matters of Foreign Policy. The Democrats spent their evening of attention on criticizing and offering no real solutions, while the Republicans were distancing themselves but suffering from the same problem of offering no real solutions to our pressing foreign policy issues, especially on the war in Iraq. The Republicans also touched on our lousy trade agreements, a subject untouched by the Democrats. The subject of former President Bill Clinton came up and the Republican candidates certainly did not touch him at all and questions about him were only greeted with smirks and smiles. Meanwhile, the Democrats couldn't get off their favorite. If anything, the republican candidates view Mrs. Clinton as a formidable candidate especially if she wins her party's nomination for president.
Three Republicans still weighing whether to run -- Fred Thompson, the actor and former Tennessee senator; Newt Gingrich, the ex-House speaker from Georgia, and Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska. They also aren't scheduled at this point to participate in the other two debates located in South Carolina and New Hampshire coming in the next month.
Published by Cameron Cowan
Cameron Cowan is a writer, student and flautist who lives in Denver, Colorado. He has been writing since he was 16 years old and believes that it is his true calling. "I'm always looking for things to write... View profile
- Myanmar: Lessons to Reconsider Our Foreign PolicyA news story/opinion piece dealing with the current situation in Myanmar and what lessons that has for teaching us what changes are necessary in American foreign policy.
- During CNN/YouTube Presidential Debate Republican Candidates Sound Off on Amnesty...During the recent CNN/YouTube debate the Republican candidates for president were asked if they would pledge to veto any bill that would provide amnesty to illegal immigrants. John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Tommy Tancred...
- The Republican Candidates and the Magic MirrorSix Republican candidates seek the endorsement of the Magic Mirror for the title of Rightwingiest nominee.
Washington State Divided Over Obama's Open Foreign Policy Historically, Washington's Governor Christine Gregoire would also go global for trade.- Mitt Romney Still Leading Republican Candidates in IowaOnly 1/4 or the Iowans polled are certain which republican candidate for President is getting their vote.
- GOP Candidates Snub Only Televised Debate Aimed at Minorities
- Google Funding GOP Candidates?
- Foreign Policy is the Name of the Game at the First Presidential Debate of 2008
- Canadian Foreign Policy in the Post-Sept. 11 World
- John Edward's Unique Foreign Policy Plan
- Republican Candidates Positions on Global Warming
- Hillary Clinton Making Multiple Choices on Foreign Policy
