In fact, all of us writers here on the AC have a lot of nerve to post our stories about current events, sports, hobbies, crafts and travel. According to Keen, we don't have the authority because we're not experts.
I've been in the newspaper business for 15 years, so I believe I have enough expert authority to say Keen is overreacting.
"Amateur hour has arrived, and now the audience is running the show," he says.
It's true that all of "us" (meaning every with Internet access) have the ability to write blogs, post videos and even publish books using the Internet. We can get our opinions and expertise out to the public, whereas in the past we could only be members of the audience.
This really bothers Keen, who feels that all of this free-floating content is cluttering the cultural landscape. He laments that fact that The New York Times has to compete for eyeballs and even advertising space with Joe Blog. As Keen puts it, it's "all Drudge and no Dostoevsky."
That seems to imply that papers like the New York Times have a God-given right to dominate the media landscape. The newspaper business is in a nosedive thanks to the easy access to news on the Internet. This hurts my career opporunities, since I'm trying to move up from a weekly paper to a daily paper - and my target newspaper is looking to cut jobs, not to add them.
It doesn't bother me that I am sharing this website with many writers who are not classically trained journalists. If you are the foremost authority on parenting, quilting or skydiving, then you deserve the reader's attention more than anyone else who could write about those topics.
The same holds true for books. I wrote one last year about my life as a pro wrestling announcer. My wife and I published the book ourselves using an online
publisher. In the past, I would have had to wait and hope for a publishing company to accept my book.
All of the publishing companies I submitted my manuscript to said no. Does that mean my book didn't deserve to be published? The people who bought my book really liked it, even if there weren't enough of them to put the book on the best-seller list. I also like the fact that my book is sitting on the library shelf
along with Andrew Keen's book.
Keen does have a point that the opinions and work of experts has to compete with those of millions of new "content producers." However, if the work is good
- and Keen's book is good - it will find an audience.
Published by Jeff D Gorman
Jeff Gorman is a journalist for a local newspaper, editor for BleacherReport.com and a legal writer for CNP. When he isn't writing he's pursuing his sports broadcasting career. When you need a profession... View profile
- "Buffy the Vampire Slayer": Future is NowJoss Whedon, the creator of the show "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" suggests new fruitful principle of co-existence between professional and amateur art. His model of professional art is designed to nurture and inspire am...
- The Coen Brothers: A BiographyHaving produced some of the most critically acclaimed films in history, Joel and Ethan Coen have cemented their places in Hollywood royalty, The brothers continue to produce major hits featuring Tinseltown's biggest...
Two for the Road: Serial Killers Henry Lee Lucas & Ottis TooleA profile of the Serial Killers Henry Lee Lucas & Ottis Toole
The Social Impact of Japanese BaseballThis institution that is Japanese baseball goes much further than a box score, a pennant race, or the corporate ties that all Japanese professional baseball franchise are attach...- Liam Neeson - the Unlikely Irish Box Office ChampionIt's strange to think today that the man from Ballymena in County Antrim, Northern Ireland, is now a most unlikely king of the box office.
- An Interview with Andrew Keen, Author of The Cult of the Amateur
- How the Internet Killed the TV
- Wikipedia and the Death of Truth: The Erosion of Credentials and Knowledge
- Discussion of the Role of New Technology and Digital Media on Filmmaking
- A Short History of the Clash
- Social Networking Sites are Creating Amateur Celebrities
- Barack Obama: Cult of Personality?

4 Comments
Post a CommentYou know what? The audience has always been running the show. Sometimes that's good, sometimes not so much. But our viewership and readership pay the bills for programmers and authors. It's not so much that we're killing any industry, it's just that now we have forums to publicly discuss how we feel and what we think about what's coming down the pike. And apparently, that threatens the Hoit E. Toits of the world, who are egotistical enough to think that all of us amateur knit-wits don't have a right to publish our own thoughts and criticisms.
good article. ended a little abruptly though. thanks.
I believe that cream rises to the top and people who produce consistent, quality work will get noticed while the people who do not will fade away. If you're good, you're not worried about competition. And if the cost of admission to the party is to be able to write like Dostoevsky, not many people would ever get published.
Great review. Glad I havent read that one