The Lakota Nation Denounces U.S. Government and Citizenship

The "New" Lakota Nation

Georga Hackworth
From AFP: The Lakota reservations are among the most impoverished areas in North America, a shameful legacy of broken treaties and apartheid policies. Lakota has the highest death rate in the United States and Lakota men have the lowest life expectancy of any nation on earth, excluding AIDS, at approximately 44 years. Lakota infant mortality rate is five times the United States average and teen suicide rates 150% more than national average. 97% of Lakota people live below the poverty line and unemployment hovers near 85%.

With statistics like these I am surprised that December 17ths act by the Lakota Nation, consisting of parts of Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming, didn't come sooner with a delegation of Lakota leaders delivered a message to the State Department announcing they were unilaterally withdrawing from treaties they signed with the federal government. There are a total of 33 treaties, some more than 150 years old, that the Lakota entered into with the United States that they claim that the government have not honored.

One would suspect that this would be big news and get national attention, but it's barely made a ripple while stories like the pregnancy of Britney Spears 16 year old sister have the limelight. The secession of the Lakota Nation from the United States into their own country that would issue its own passports and drivers licenses and live tax-free provided the residents renounce their US Citizenship should be big political news, especially with a presidential election around the corner. It's no secret that the Native American Indians have never been enamored with the U.S. Government, but this act only proves that the political tide in America is changing. The want of the American people for change in the government is reflected in the popularity of presidential contender Ron Paul.

Surfing the internet looking for information and news stories on the Lakota Nation yesterday brought me to several message boards and blogs where people were discussing the event. Not everyone seems to support the move that the Lakota Nation has made to preserve their culture and try to save their own people from poverty and early deaths.

Popular opinion on AOL, where the most heated debate seems to be taking place, is that the Lakota Nation will still be receiving US Government assistance in forms such as food stamps, welfare and medical care. Someone even went as far as to say that any money they get from the federal government won't different than the foreign aid we give other countries. These people fail to realize that Indian reservations are some of the poorest communities in America with substandard education. The Lakota have either finally had enough of broken promises by the United States Government or have given up entirely on it. They now want to be left to fix things themselves in a way that will protect their culture.

I can't say I blame them.

Instead of seeing this a catalyst for change and reform, others seem to think that the U.S. government will never take this event seriously or that we should build fences and hire border guards to keep the Lakota in their "nation" and out of the United States, that they should be treated like every other foreigner. Never mind that they were here first. The European settlers are the ones that changed their way of life and in the end confined them to reservations. I sometimes wonder if those reservations, that were supposed to be a compromise in the beginning, have not turned into another form of segregation promoting bigotry.

With the "speak English or get out of the country" attitude a lot of people have against immigrants it's not surprising that society, for the most part, is still expecting the Native Americans to conform and accept "the way of life as the white man". Since it is our ancestors that came to the United States shouldn't we be adapting to the way of life of the natives?

Published by Georga Hackworth

Georga Hackworth has been working as a freelance writer since 2005. Her expertise includes SEO web content, homeschool curriculum, training manuals, and movie, product and web content reviews. Hackworth has...  View profile

10 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Denise7/29/2010

    I respect the American Indians with all of my heart. The treatment of peoples all over the world is a black mark on our govt. I would love to visit the Lakota nation and hear their story. These people are the true Americans, and I apologize, on behalf of our govt., and the lack of American citizens in defending this great heritage, for the appalling treatment of the Lakota, and the rest of the true Americans. I pray for better days ahead as we all realize that our destiny is that of unity and respect for each other.

  • Robert Barnes1/5/2010

    Although I am English, I am apalled at the treatment of the Native Americans. Also the hypocrasy of successive US governments to preach human rights to the rest of the world, while treating the 'True Americans' so shamefully. I pray that now America have a black president things might change.

  • mary landers3/14/2009

    I am tired of hearing how the blacks have been treated. How about how the American Indians have been and still are being treated. I never hear anything in the news about "The True Americans".

  • Native Lakota7/23/2008

    Sorry to hear that you think that the Lakota withdrew from the US, His-Story (history) will never admit the whole truth, so be it, and if you want to know, they are a sovereign nation, with their own language, own government, own laws, own courts.No state laws apply on Indian Land.

  • Native Lakota7/23/2008

    Sorry to hear that you think that the Lakota withdrew from the US, His-Story (history) will never admit the whole truth, so be it, and if you want to know, they are a sovereign nation, with their own language, own government, own laws, own courts.No state laws apply on Indian Land.

  • Jaahda Jinnah7/6/2008

    PS - hardly anyone seems to read any issues i write on indigenous issues. never a comment either.

  • Jaahda Jinnah7/6/2008

    What a very familiar sounding story - I wonder if us mob in aus should do this too!!!

  • A Writer6/25/2008

    quite interesting tidbit of info-interested to see how this develops

  • Georga Hackworth1/1/2008

    Chadd - Feel free to play semantics and miss the point.
    But, to address your need for semantics, a community is defined as: a social group of any size whose members reside in a specific locality, share government, and often have a common cultural and historical heritage. Considering that these "sovereignties", as you so put it, or reservations or whatever you want to call them are on American soil and prior to the Lakotas withdrawing from the US were under US governmental jurisdiction, that made them communities within the United States.

  • Chadd De Las Casas1/1/2008

    "Poorest communities in America" is frightfully deceptive - i.e., they're not American communities, they're independent sovereignties. That's like saying "Mexico City is the largest city in America!"

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.