Namely, there is something that unifies the world (constitutes it as a continuum) which if you go forward or backward in time remains entirely the same. It is, in effect, through this conservation or out of it that all real-world dynamics occurs, yet the first law of thermodynamics itself is entirely indifferent to these changes or dynamics. As far as the first law is concerned, nothing changes at all, and this is just the definition of a symmetry, something that remains invariant, indifferent or unchanged given certain transformations, and the remarkable point with respect to the first law is that it refers to that which is conserved (the quantity of energy) or remains symmetric under all transformations.
Although intuited at least as early as the work of the Milesian physicists, and in modern times particularly by Leibniz, the first law of thermodynamics is taken to have been first explicitly "discovered" in the first part of the last century by Mayer, then Joule, and later Helmholz with the demonstration of the equivalence of heat and other forms of energy, and completed in this century with Einsteins's demonstration that matter is also a form of energy.The second law of thermodynamics (the entropy law or law of entropy) was formulated in the middle of the last century by Clausius and Thomson following Carnot's earlier observation that, like the fall or flow of a stream that turns a mill wheel, it is the "fall" or flow of heat from higher to lower temperatures that motivates a steam engine.
The key insight was that the world is inherently active, and that whenever an energy distribution is out of equilibrium a potential or thermodynamic "force" (the gradient of a potential) exists that the world acts spontaneously to dissipate or minimize. All real-world change or dynamics is seen to follow, or be motivated, by this law. So whereas the first law expresses that which remains the same, or is time-symmetric, in all real-world processes the second law of thermodynamics expresses that which changes and motivates the change, the fundamental time-asymmetry, in all real-world process.
Clausius coined the term "entropy" to refer to the dissipated potential and the second law, in its most general form, states that the world acts spontaneously to minimize potentials (or equivalently maximize entropy), and with this, active end-directedness or time-asymmetry was, for the first time, given a universal physical basis. The balance equation of the second law, expressed as S > 0, says that in all natural processes the entropy of the world always increases, and thus whereas with the first law there is no time, and the past, present, and future are indistinguishable, the second law, with its one-way flow, introduces the basis for telling the difference.
The active nature of the second law of thermodynamics is intuitively easy to grasp and empirically demonstrate. If a glass of hot liquid, for example, is placed in a colder room a potential exists and a flow of heat is spontaneously produced from the cup to the room until it is minimized (or the entropy is maximized) at which point the temperatures are the same and all flows stop.
Scientists of today site the second law of thermodynamics as proof that the universe began at the big bang, as it couldn't have existed forever, due to this increasing entropy, pointing an arrow through time to it's final resting place in equilibrium. My view is that they are wrong, and that the big crunch follows the big bang, and creates another big bang of equal size, and this process has always been going on, for eternity. There is no reaction which could take place in a universe without time or space, because both are needed for any reaction to take place, so time and space are eternal, and everything which can possibly happen has happened before, and will happen again, due to the nature of eternity. Source: www.entropylaw.com
Published by rowan casey
I now have a site called Professional Social Promotion which provides social media marketing services such as Twitter followers and Facebook page likes. View profile
Is God Responsible for Good and Evil in the Universe?In this article I discuss the limitations inherent in the nature of an all powerful God.- Scientists Who Do Not Believe in the Theory of Evolution Respond to Those Who BelieveDo almost all scientists believe in evolution? Are there any scientists who don't? Down through the ages there have been countless scientists who do not believe and have not been ashamed to tell why.
The Effects of Oil Scarcity in Post-Fordist SocietyMany of the current social and economic ills facing our country can be traced to fossil fuels, or the lack thereof. This essay explores the influence of the oil weapon on the c...- A Brief History of the Sundance Film FestivalA quick look at the history behind one of the top five film festivals in the world.
The Runt of the Litter: How to Help Him Grow Up Happy and HealthySome people think the runt of the litter is not the best choice for a pet but maybe they've overlooked something...
- Energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- The First Law of Thermodynamics
- Laws of Thermodynamics
- Second Richest Man in the World, Carlos Slim
- Passion, Love and Entropy
- The Death of Darwinism
- The Theory of Evolution and What's Wrong with the Arguments Against it
- The laws of thermodynamics
- The laws of thermodynamics
- The laws of thermodynamics



