The Lifeboat Scenario: What Would You Do?

Survival Skills

Misha

You are in a lifeboat along with four others. You have only enough food and water to keep four alive for the several weeks you expect to be adrift until you float into a shipping lane and can be discovered and rescued. You will definitely all perish if the five of you consume the food and water. There is the suggestion that one of you should die so that the other four can live. Would you volunteer to commit suicide? Would you vote to have one go overboard if you choose by straws? Would you vote to throw overboard the weakest and sickliest of the five? If you were on a jury judging the behavior of four who did murder a fifth in order to stay alive, would you acquit them or convict them of murder?

There are many factors that need to be taken into consideration for this scenario. The first one I would consider would be the rationing of the supplies and food. There is also the option of taking a chance and using the resources around you for survival. One way or another someone is probably going to get sick or die. It can take up to three days to become used to the motion of the sea. (The Bombard Experience) It has been said that you should not drink the water from the ocean. To a point this is true because it can cause you to become ill.

The Bombard Experience was an experiment done by Dr. Bombard. Dr. Bombard proved that it is possible to "subsist for more than a month in a decent state in the sea." It has also been proven in the Bombard Experience that you can drink up to 32 ounces of sea water per day. This is of course provided that you begin doing so immediately. The experiment showed that you can not do it for more than five days at a time. If you were to all begin drinking saltwater and save the non-saltwater for the following week your supplies would last longer. The other option for quenching your thirst for a period of time is to immerse yourself into the water. "Contact with the water will cause your thirst to diminish." (The Bombard Experience)The other proven fact of survival on the sea is that you can catch plankton to eat. This can easily be done with either a small fishing net, or a piece of clothing used as a net. Plankton is safe to eat, and you would be able to supplement your current supply of food.
I don't feel that expecting someone to give up their life without a fight would be reasonable or humane for that matter. I do not feel that throwing someone overboard would be acceptable either. I would not volunteer to commit suicide so that I could be eaten. I would try everything possible to survive. I would agree that if I were to die that they could consume my remains for survival. I would feel that at that point it would be fair because the other members would have a chance of survival. I would expect that the other members of the boat would commit to the same option as well.

In the Bombard experience, it was proven that by moving around you will be caused to lose weight and can lose up to two meals worth. It is advised that if possible you should lie down in the boat to avoid losing weight or energy. Dr. Bombard survived at sea for over a month, with just the resources I mentioned. The chance for survival of the group would be increased because they already have food, and there is food within the sea as well.

If I were on a jury and judging the fate of those who did murder for survival, I would have to convict them. The reason is because they would fulfill the purpose of premeditated murder. "Premeditated murder involves a purpose to kill, accomplished with forethought."(Purpose to Kill Offenses) Under California law, it is written that "Malice can be express or implied.' "It is express when the defendant posses a purpose to take another's life." They would all be guilty because they willingly took another life, with the intent of their own personal survival. It would be different if one of the people had died naturally and the other people on the boat ate the remains. In my opinion murder is a crime even if they felt at the time they were doing the right thing for their own survival.

Published by Misha

Working professional helping people resolve their tax issues with the State and Federal Taxing authorities. Also enjoys volunteering and spending time with family and friends.  View profile

  • It is possible to survive being stranded on a life boat
  • Dr. Bombard survived this very feat!
  • Bombard says you can survive for up to a month being stranded.

5 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Amanda Sparks2/19/2007

    When I saw the article title I thought you were going to cover the scenario in the context of it being used as a team building exercise. But this is a review of a scientific experiment and I am pleasantly surprised. You took a potentially sterile subject and gave it heart.

  • Dana Richardson11/25/2006

    First thought was..."please tell me they aren't dredging that up again?- is it election time? Philosophy grads at UCal got dosed again?" But after a few cynical moments, your articles excellent writing began to sink in, as I began to realize, you had "opened a veign" and were letting the blood of writ pour forth about this troubling element of what it means to survive. In Colorado people got stranded years back in snow, Packer comes to mind as a cannibal, etc. It's not an easy thing to decide, nor to dwell on, which is why I'm gonna help my wife with the Christmas lights now...glad you wrote this...

  • Chuck11/10/2006

    as Lindemann found that one couldn't get fresh water from fish in such a manner, not surprising since their bodily fluids are saline. Nevertheless, Bombard claimed he managed to do so and survived in this way for some days, although I don't find it clear just how many, not having his book before me. What I find mentioned online is that he drank seawater (in addition to his fish juice, apparently) for no more than 3 to 6 days at a time, but that rain didn't come for 23 days. This would suggest that he used other water before he got the rainwater. At any rate, after the rains started, his problem was not lack of fresh water, in fact, he joked that he might drown in it if the rain kept up, and after several such rains he had more than enough rainwater for his voyage.

    The French Navy experiments suggested that small amounts of salt water could be drunk starting right away when the body was well hydrated, and that if you then drank fresh water after several days your body could then flu

  • chuck11/10/2006

    which he was not supposed to use, and it may be that he didn't, but Dr. Hannes Lindemann, who later did several similar experiments with more data reported, also reported that Bombard was reprovisioned at sea at least twice, with photos of one of these times being printed in a Dutch newspaper. Regardless, Bombard did definitely do something that was difficult at best and came through alive and in relatively good health, although anemic and having lost 55 pounds in 65 days, and he did (and does) advocate the drinking of small amounts of seawater as an emergency measure. His voyage seems to very often be inaccurately reported (although generally not so inaccurately as Verhaegen did). His idea was to start off drinking seawater and getting fresh water temporarily (until he could collect rain) from crushing chucks of fish (which he would catch) in a press, and using a fine net to get plankton for Vitamin C, the major dietary necessity he couldn't get from fish. This is problematic, however

  • Chuck11/10/2006


    He has claimed that seawater is potable to humans:
    "Never heard of the Bombard experiments? French Navy IIRC. When one gradually shifts to drinking small frequent bits of seawater + eating fish, it's possible to survive for months."
    Verhaegen, May 8, 2004 sci.anthropology.paleo



    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    This is incredibly stupid, and dangerous - it's completely false and if followed, would result in extreme ill-health and, if continued, death. How a medical doctor could believe such nonsense is incredible to me. The experiments of Dr. Alain Bombard, and the subsequent followup experiments by the French Navy, did not show what Verhaegen claims they did.
    Dr. Bombard did an experiment where he drifted in a raft across the Atlantic, supposedly without any rations being used other than things he got from the sea. I say supposedly because he did carry fresh water and provisions

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.