The Manson Family Murders

The Prospect of Releasing Susan Atkins

K. D. Adams
The "Manson Family" is once again in the news with word that Susan Atkins is seeking to be released from prison due to health concerns. She has terminal brain cancer and doctors have told her she has only six months to live. It has been reported that Atkins has also had a leg amputated for reasons I do not know. She is seeking a release on "compassionate" grounds. This I find amusing since she showed absolutely no compassion for her victims. Let's look at Susan Atkins and her actions and see if she or ANY of the Manson Family deserves compassion.

This is for the younger readers who may not know about these gruesome murders:

On July 25, 1969, on orders from Charles Manson, Susan Atkins a.k.a. Sadie Mae Glutz, Bobby Beausoleil, and Mary Brunner went to the home of Gary Hinman. Why they went there is a matter of contention. Some reports say they went there to confront Hinman for a bad batch of LSD they had received from him. Other reports say that Charles Manson had heard that Hinman had inherited a large some of money and they wanted to rob him. In any event, Hinman was beaten by Beausoleil and when Hinman didn't give in to their demands, Manson should up wielding a sword and cut off Hinman's ear and slashing his face. Atkins and Brunner were order to stay behind and tend to Hinman's wounds. After two days and a phone call from Manson, Beausoleil killed Hinman. Atkins would later plead guilty to being involved in this murder. Beausoleil was arrested on August 7, 1969 while asleep in the victim's vehicle still wearing the bloody clothes from the murder almost 2 weeks earlier.

On the night of August 8, 1969 Atkins along with Patricia Krenwinkel, Linda Kasabian and Charles "Tex" Watson went to the Beverly Hills home of actress Sharon Tate and movie producer/director Roman Polanski with orders from Manson to "kill everyone there". Shortly after midnight on the morning of August 9, Atkins stabbed Sharon Tate (who was 8 ½ months pregnant at the time) to death and used her blood to write the word "PIG" on the front door. Tate was stabbed 16 times and was found with a rope around her neck that was slung over a ceiling rafter and tied to Jay Sebring's neck. Along with Sharon Tate, four other people were murdered that morning; Steven Parent was found shot to death in the front seat of his car in the driveway as he was trying to leave, Jay was shot, stabbed 7 times and kicked by Watson after Jay told Watson that Tate was pregnant and to leave her alone. Coffee heiress Abigail Folger was stabbed but managed to get out of the house before Krenwinkel caught her on the lawn stabbed her 28 times and Watson shot her. Wojciech Frykowski received the worst of all of them. He fought hard for his life against Watson and also managed to escape the house. He was also caught on the lawn, shot twice; pistol whipped and stabbed a total of 51 times.

Charles Manson thought that the murders were "too messy" and said he "would show them how it's done". The following night, August 9, Manson, Atkins, Kasabian, Watson, Leslie Van Houten and Steve "Clem" Grogan drove to North Eastern Los Angeles to the home of grocery store owners Leno and Rosemary LaBianca. Once there, Manson and Watson tied the couple up at gun point and told them they were there to just rob them. Manson left the house, went back to the car and instructed Krenwinkel and Van Houten to "do as Tex said". Watson began stabbing Leno while Krenwinkel and Van Houten stabbed Rosemary. The two girls called for Watson to help them because Rosemary was flailing around and between the three of them, they stabbed Rosemary 41 times. Watson then returned to Leno and continued stabbing him. Krenwinkel had also stabbed him with a 14" carving fork and left it sticking out of Leno's stomach and a steak knife sticking out of his throat. He had been stabbed over a dozen times. One of the "family" members had carved the word "WAR" into his stomach. The girls then wrote the words "RISE" and "DEATH TO PIGS" on the living room wall and "HEALTER SKELTER" (Helter Skelter misspelled) on the refrigerator. All were written in the victim's blood.

With the exception of Linda Kasabian, all were tried, convicted of 1st degree murder and sentenced to death for these murders. While she was present for both the Tate and LaBianca murders, she did not participate in the killings. The state therefore granted her immunity for her cooperation and testimony. No Manson Family members were ever executed because on February 18, 1972 the California Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty in that state was unconstitutional and all the defendants in the case had their sentences commuted to life with the possibility of parole.

This is not news but it is important to here the details once again as Susan Atkins is trying to get out of prison. She probably has the best shot at getting released because she's not going to be alive much longer and the doctors say she'll probably remain hospitalized until her death. But the question is.....should she be released?

These murders took place 39 years ago next month and while none of the players were executed, none of them have been released either. Should any of these people be allowed to walk the Earth free? After all, they were re-sentenced with the chance of parole and spending almost 40 years in jail seems like a fair sentence, doesn't it? All of them have had multiple parole hearings and all were denied.

There are going to be a million of you who say "fuck 'em; let them rot!" But before you do, let me ask a question of all of you. Please think about this before you respond. Is there a point when someone deserves a second chance even when they have committed a heinous crime such as these? We know that most of the "family" members in this case were young drugged out kids when they went on this murdering rampage. Now they are in there 50s and 60s and are not the same people they were back then. Charlie Manson is crazier than a shit house rat so let me make it clear that I'm not talking about him. He wants to stay in prison and that's fine with me.

Should we, as a society, show any of them compassion or mercy? I'm on the fence about this for many reasons. I think that these crimes were so gruesome and outrageous that I wouldn't have had a problem with their original death sentences and I'm a death penalty opponent. So how much time should they have to serve before we can say that they have paid their debt to society? I am a firm believer that people can change for the better and I also believe that none of these people (with the exception of Charlie) are no longer a danger to society. I have read A LOT about Atkins, Van Houten, Krenwinkel and Watson and from what I see; they have all turned their lives around so why not give them a second chance. What do you say? I am "sort of" just kidding.

It is my belief that all of them will die in prison and I don't think that will hurt anyone's feelings. Those seven people were tortured and killed because a madman wanted to start a race war. What possible reason should there be to allow them to breathe free air again? This is still one of the most infamous murders in United States history and will be talked about for decades to come. I want to hear you views on this case and what you think about Susan Atkins possibly being released from prison. I don't want any of them set free but that is just this man's opinion.

Published by K. D. Adams

New York State Employee who is seeking to abolish the death penalty not only in this country but worldwide.  View profile

10 Comments

Post a Comment
  • let her go9/7/2008

    it seems to me lot of people killed sharon tate she must of been a cat. poeple were not even there did it. You know who really did it kids.
    young kids. they're spending $ & time in the sun looking for body's of other manson family members killed out there. Why not cut a deal for mom's & dad's to know where the kids are by Susan Atkins. the mom's & dad's have to be dead was well by now as Susan Atkins didn't have a Church of Satan membership card, they didn't make them @ that time. She was highly involved as she seemed to be with a lot of stoff. SHE WAS A KID !

  • K. D. Adams7/28/2008

    Excuse my horrible spelling!

  • K. D. Adams7/28/2008

    Cynthia, I appreciate your comments and you bring up a very good point. When you look at someone like Susan Atkins today, It's hard to imagine the heartless individule she was back in the late '60s. She looks more like someone's Grandmother than an inmate. Yes, we all change as we grow and I'm sure Susan has tried to put these murders out of her head and forget that part of her life. But know matter how much she has changed over the years, we cannot lose sight of the fact that those hands she uses to tend to her garden are the same hands she used to butcher Sharon Tate . I have no doubt that Susan has repented for her violent acts but she still is Susan Atkins and she is the same woman who brought Hell to Earth in August of 1969. I am glad you are doing better yourself and I hope you continue to grow as well.

  • Cynthia7/17/2008

    I feel tremendous compassion for the families of those murdered. And I might not have an objective opinion some would say. I think that granting her the release would be an act of compassion. Yes what she did and stood for was demented and twisted. But the woman I met across a cold steel table one Thanksgiving was not the woman who performed those acts. I spent just under 3 years in the california prison known as CIW for a non violent crime. I didn't steal from or harm anyone, except myself. It was a drug charge. I spent many afternoons joking with her as I deliveried bark pieces to her by tractor, dumping them so she could tend to her gardens of which were beautiful! The person I knew was a woman who loved her fellow man, her flowers and glowed with her love for God. I don't believe she would swat a fly. My concern would be, could she survive outside those walls? No, someone else would end up doing a life sentence for ending hers. For that reason only I say "Leave her there"

  • Justice for Cyril7/15/2008

    It doesn't matter if they are still a danger to society or not (with the exception of Charlie). They had the death penalty, they lucked out and had it commuted. They got life instead. They must serve that life sentence and be happy they were able to live at all. There are consequences. Up to now the parole board has denied all of them. For good reason in my opinion. They have not yet served their sentences. I remember when those crimes were committed. It sends chills down my spine as well. She can have a peaceful death in prison as easily as she can out of prison. She does not deserve to be released. How can compassion be shown to her when she had none for Tate or her unborn child. Then bragged about it to boot. No, she must stay and finish out her sentence. Compassion should be for the family of all their victims......Good article though.

  • JD7/14/2008

    I dont know KD I am on the fence on this one, if she poses no threat to society then really in an act of compassion after so long in prison, to die with family is an act of human decency. I read about these murders and what a tragic horrific loss of innocence, great article by the way.

  • TAZ7/11/2008

    The answer to your question KD is NO! In this situation where no doubt exists and the person was involved in more then one incident on several different days I believe society should show the same compassion that their victims were shown. She should die a peaceful death in the prison hospital we society can be assured she will remain no threat. The prison hospital can provide the exact same care this woman can receive on the outside so there is no need for her release.

  • Emily7/11/2008

    Great article KD! :o)

  • Sheryl Young7/11/2008

    K.D. - I will never forget the Sharon Tate et al murders, having just seen her in a movie days before. I don't believe I've ever read as much of the unfortunate details as you've given here. It's painful to read and the names involved all still send shivers up my spine. There is always room for God's mercy, but that doesn't mean people shouldn't suffer their consequences. I understand that DNA evidence is getting many innocent people out of jail, but with murders like these, it is extremely hard for me to believe the death penalty should be completely abolished. Great, great article though.

  • K. D. Adams7/10/2008

    Writer's Note: On page 3 I meant to say that "I don't think that any of these people(with the exception of Charlie) are still a danger to society."
    Sorry for the type-O

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.