The M'Naghten Rule was one such instance-- it should have been left as it was. Instead, the modern American Criminal Justice system took over, changing it as it saw fit; resulting in the present day, when criminals are the only ones receiving anything even remotely connected to "justice," and often far beyond what they deserve.
The original insanity defense was spelled out as: "...the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong."
Throughout the years, states have varied in their own individual interpretations of the insanity defense, to where it bears little resemblance to its original form and its original intent. This includes such concepts as "diminished capacity," which has been upheld, revised, thrown out, and changed; as well as everything imaginable being categorized as "mental defect." In other words, in neglecting the strict criteria for "insanity," the criminal justice system has become too quick to give people easy excuses.
The initial idea was that if a person is not verifiably "insane," he not only is responsible for his actions but should be held accountable for them. Not only has neglecting this destroyed true justice in the criminal justice system, it has also diminished the quality of human life-- for what does it say about a Human Being if he is not responsible for his own actions? And what is the quality of life in American society when too many see the criminal justice system as laughable, in terms of everything they can "get away with"?
There are those who commit serious crimes, including destructive crimes against other people, because they honestly do possess such "disease of the mind" that they do not have the capacity to "appreciate the nature" of their acts. However-- the laxness of today's criminal justice system is backfiring by presenting ready-made excuses to the many who do not fit that category. Instead of those who lack the capacity to understand their actions, there are more and more who fully understand what they are doing, yet believe, often accurately, that they will get away with it.
Perhaps everyone would be better off if the American criminal justice system were to stop allowing sociopaths, who are fully aware of their actions, to claim "defect of reasoning" or "diminished capacity," and, instead, to bear consequences for their actions.
Published by C.
...... View profile
- With Charles Chatman in the News, DNA Testing Reveals Flaws in Criminal Justice Sy...Texas is set to release another prisoner exonerated by DNA testing, underscoring flaws in the criminal conviction process.
The Goals of Sentencing in Today's Criminal Justice SystemPunishment and sentencing practices are constantly changing in the United States. From "getting tough on crime" to programs that encourage rehabilitation. This is an overview of...- The Criminal Justice System After 9/11Our criminal justice system has changed since the attacks of September 11, 2001.
The Mentally Ill and the Justice SystemThis is a research paper I did for college- Plea Bargains and Mandatory SentencingPlea bargains and mandatory sentencing are two aspects of the American Criminal Justice System that often go hand-in-hand. Both were designed with good intentions. Both are also highly controversial, especially as th...
- Common Sense Guidelines to Weight Loss
- Common Sense and the American Revolutionary War
- Criminal Defenses: Court Room Primer
- Andrea Yates, John Hinckley and the Insanity Plea: A Look Back
- Insanity During the Commission of a Crime - Determining the Mental Competence of a...
- Criminal Justice System in Action: The Adversarial System
- Dissolving Myths About America's Criminal Justice System



