The Movie Crash and the Concepts of Sociology

Julie Moore
The movie Crash is chock full of sociological concepts, examining issues of race, social class, and gender, as well as many others. In this movie, we can see the theories of Durkheim and Marx for sure as well as many other concepts. Crash is one of those movies that make us rethink even what we think we know about the world we live in.

The first sociological concept that Crash demonstrates is the Thomas Theorem. Basically, this theorem tells us that if we believe situations to be real, they become real to us. Our own subjective reality becomes our objective reality. It follows then that if we believe certain things about an individual, he/she begins acting in exactly that way. It also follows that certain crimes or problems do not have an objective realities. Using drugs would be one example of that sort of victimless crime. The best example of this in the movie might be when Jean Cabot grips her purse when passing by Anthony (Ludicris) and Peter on the street. She believes black people to be a threat.

Her subjective reality becomes real in the next minute when the two young black men carjack them. Another example would be our expectations of Arabs to be violent terrorists. Farhad is not even Arab. Technically, he is Persian, but what the shop owner expects from him, he eventually gets when Farhad "shoots" the little Hispanic girl. Farhad believes the Hispanic man is ripping him off so when his shop is looted, the Hispanic man is blamed although he had nothing to do with the destruction. What the characters believe about others has become real in these instances.

Another sociological term demonstrated in Crash is the theory of micro-aggression. Microaggressions would be defined as "Microaggressions are subtle insults (verbal, nonverbal, and/or visual) directed toward people of color, often automatically or unconsciously." While the individual effects of these particular instances may be small, the cumulative effects can be devastating. In Crash, I believe the character that most exemplifies this is the film director. Examples of these subtle insults would be things such as people telling him that he just isn't really black to them or the comments about language on the set of the movie. He advises him to tell the black character to make his language "more black." These are subtle but insults nonetheless. These kinds of comments, combined with the powerlessness he feels when his wife is sexually assaulted lead to the blow-up where he almost gets himself killed. He has endured these subtle forms of racism his whole life, and he reaches a breaking point where he just isn't going to take it

The last concept that is displayed in Crash is the sociological concept of ethnocentrism. This means that we judge other cultures by the standards of our own. Not only that, but we also believe that our own culture is superior to everyone else's. Graham and his Latina girlfriend fight and he pokes fun at her culture by calling her Mexican even though she isn't. Asian Americans speech patterns are made fun of, like the term "blaking" for braking. These characters don't celebrate or even accept the characteristics of other cultures. They only mock them, assuming the superiority of their own culture. They fail to try to understand one another through ethnocentrism. Officer Ryan makes fun of the name Shaniqua, a more common name of African American culture.

All in all, Crash is a movie full of sociological concepts. Many more could be analyzed in this paper, but the focus was on only these three. Crash is a movie that makes us both laugh and cry, sometimes at almost the same time. When we laugh, however, we must question the underlying sociological assumptions or concepts that make us laugh. Are we laughing at some of the racist jokes because of our own ethnocentrism. Are we failing to see the microaggressions directed at members of minority groups all the time. Are we as guilty as Jean Cabot at making our own realities our truths? Do we have beliefs about certain groups of people and essentially make them come true for ourselves? Crash asks us to question all of these things.

References

Solorzano, Daniel, Ceja, Miguel, Yosso, Tara "Critical Race Theory, Racial Microagressions, and Campus Racial Climate: The Experiences of African American College Students," Journal of Negro Education, Winter 2000. Retrieved March 13, 2007 from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3626/is_200001/ai_n8894484

Published by Julie Moore

I am a high school English teacher of 15 years who has recently moved to the field of Educational Adminstration. I am a Curriculum Coordinator and a Gifted and Talented Coordinator. I am highly literate a...  View profile

6 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Rich S4/30/2012

    i love this movie and i just got done doing a paper based on this movie as well. You article is great i loved reading it

  • Rich S4/30/2012

    i love this movie and i just got done doing a paper based on this movie as well. You article is great i loved reading it

  • Terrie Brockmann2/9/2011

    I just watched this movie in my college course, Diversity in Our Workplace. It is a great film. You did a great job of analyzing it from the sociology slant. Wish I had watched it when I took Sociology. Instructor didn't list it as an option.
    Great review!

  • sociology112/1/2010

    Trying this link one more time: <a href="http://hubpages.com/hub/Crash-A-Sociological-Analysis"> Another sociological analysis of Crash </a>

  • sociology112/1/2010

    The part about Microaggression was informative. I had never heard of that before. It's true that Cameron the film director does finally blow up because of the "straw that broke the camel's back, so to speak. For additional sociological analysis of this movie, see: http://hubpages.com/hub/Crash-A-Sociological-Analysis

  • billy10/15/2008

    hey thx for the article

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.