The NAACP Has No Room to Talk About Another Group Being Racist

Every now and then something happens that can just get under your skin and annoy you. This really hit me when the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People had the audacity to brand the Tea Party as a racist movement and not people who are upset over the spending of the Obama administration and them turning a deaf ear to the will of the people. This is really hypocritical consider the name NAACP.

As many people know the United States has had some bad racial problems. I will not rehash a long dissertation on history, but there was and is a large amount of bigotry throughout the country and not just in the South as often claimed and though. In times of slavery a free black man could not even enter the state of Illinois where Obama and Lincoln were from yet it was called a "free state". In the antebellum south free blacks had many privileges including voting (in very rare cases though). In has been proven there were black slave holders throughout the South and especially Louisiana, but things like that are things the NAACP would not want the average person to hear. Poor whites and blacks (and some wealthy whites) actually got along in many cases prior to the War Between the States. What too many people do not realize is that not all southerners supported the system of slavery. It was a fact that less than 10% of the population that owned any slaves. The war was not fought on slavery as Lincoln himself said he would have kept the institution to preserve the Union. Slavery was definitely an issue, but it was the rich elite of the South and not all Southerners. The masses were concerned about a federal government exploiting the south and passing very unfair tariffs that were being put into place. Lincoln once said he could not let the South secede because "Who would pay the taxes?". Kind of reminds me of another President from Illinois.

I believe there would not have been as much racial division after the war, but Reconstruction harmed races relations and the bitterness and hatred is still in place for many Americans. The sad thing is that the Northerners and many abolitionists did not favor the Negro or even view him as an equal. Many did not want them up north or able to vote and do all the things they were forcing on the former Confederate States. Many northerners did not like slavery. This was not because of the cruelty or inhumane nature of it slavery, but the competition slavery provided to slave states that had slavery that the Free states did not have. As long as the Negro was not voting up North the Yankees were fine with them voting. They basically figured the Negro would mindlessly vote Republican (kind of like they often do democrat now) and keep the republicans in control of the south. This was done by military force. This was in addition to all of the pathetic way people like General Sherman brought war to women and children when he marched down south. He burnt homes and some of those people did not even favor secession or slavery. Obviously this left much bitterness. The northerners even went as far as to disenfranchise white people by not allowing them to vote even if they did not support secession or serve in the confederacy. Unless they were a flaming unionist, carpetbagger, southern republican or white person with a racial identity crisis they were not able to vote. This directly fueled the racism that could have been averted. Basically the Northerners told the Negro that they were owed something by the southerners for slavery. At the same time rich elite white people told the poor and average white southerners how the North was using the Negro to destroy them. This is how Reconstruction led to the violence associated with the Ku Klux Klan and various other groups that terrorized blacks and carpetbaggers. Most people don't know many victims of the Klan initially were white and not black. There were countless people lynched, murdered as well as civil unrest. To reward the Negro for their service the northerners turned their back on the Negro to get Rutherford B. Hayes elected President. All federal troops and reconstruction governments were removed. This was after the north encouraged much upiddiness in slaves against their former masters then leaving them with no protection.

Out the mess that ensued causing the disenfranchisement of blacks after white democrats regained control of the south the NAACP was formed. There is no doubt that the organization was needed at that time. Citizens were not being protected by the law and being murdered just because they were black because of the hate left from the way the North attempted to exploit the south by using the Negro during Reconstruction. At that time there was a need for the NAACP. They did good things for many of Americans of various races but mostly minorities. Now things are a bit different though.

I have heard the NAACP described as a "The Klan with a tan". I am not quite ready to go that far, but they clearly have an agenda to promote the Negro race and other minority races often at the expense of the white race. You can't fight racism with more racism as the modern NAACP and groups and polices supported by them do. When Dr. Martin Luther King jr. was alive the NAACP simply wanted to be judged for "the content of their hearts and not the color of their skin". That is how is should be and what many Americans believed in. Now they just want whatever they can get. In many cases they are even abandoning the Negro race they are supposed to support. A good example of this is how pro-illegal immigrant the group is. While not as dramatic as La Razza, the NAACP seems to condemn any law that would stop illegal aliens from coming or staying in the country. I believe most blacks are too stupid to realize that amnesty for illegal invaders will hurt the black race more than the white race. Fortunately many blacks are starting to realize this as well. Many of the jobs blacks would usually get could be taken by newly legalized foreign invaders. The black man suffered at the whip of the overseer and sat in the back of the bus and at segregated under funded schools to before getting the American dream. The NAACP seems to think thought there is nothing wrong with illegal invaders getting the American dream with the stroke of a pen after breaking our laws and financially burdening our country with the cost of the anchor babies and the prison system and healthcare system. This has happened more and more since people like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have been involved with the group. Now it seems like the NAACP and other so called civil rights organizations see nothing wrong with anything blacks do against someone white. The NAACP often turns a blind eye to racism and hate crimes committed by Negroes or tries to sugar coat it. Here are some examples of their clear black supremacist agenda.

I once wrote an article on the Jena 6. I won't rehash the whole article here. In a nutshell there were racial tensions in the town of Jena, Louisiana. There was a tree that a bunch of white kids sat under. A black kid decided they wanted to set there to prove a point of some sort and make trouble knowing he was not wanted there. The white kids did not make an issue going were the black kids hung out. I do fully believe the student did have a right to sit under the tree if they chose. I believe the interest was more in stirring trouble than a genuine interest to actually be there. After the next day that blacks sat under there some white students hung nooses from a tree. The group that did it was caught and did receive a suspension. It should come as no surprise that groups like the NAACP thought they should have been drawn and quartered for doing a non-violent act. I don't think hanging a noose is a hate crime unless there is property damage, but I do think it was a clear case of intimidation and should have been dealt with as it had. Would the black Reich have preferred the kids lose their future because of a dumb mistake that did no physical harm to anyone?

After these events a young man named Justin Barker was savagely attacked by a Negro named Mychal Bell and five other Negroes. The attack was unprovoked and savage. They beat him unconscious and continued beating him. If he had been kicked in the head a couple more times he could have been killed. You would figure all civilized people who are not barbaric would condemn this. The group were charged with serious crimes based on the attack and could have faced serious jail time as they should have for such a brutal act totally based on the race of the victim. Despite the fact that Barker was targeted for his race this was not treated as a hate crime. The NAACP not only did not consider it a hate crime, but they went as far as making the Jena 6 out to be "civil rights" heroes when in reality they were thugs and savages who brutally attacked a person based on his race. There were some reports that Barker had said the N-word. He and the Jena 6 said he did not say that, but if he did they have no right to put their hands on him. If he said that and him and Bell just got into a fight that would have been a school yard fight, but for them to attack him was uncalled for even if that word was uncalled for. It is also worth adding that many Negroes call each other that and Negroes were referred to as the n-word before black and before African-American. There was an outpouring of support. Even some self-hating white people were supporting the Jena 6 and there was a decent amount of money raised in a legal defense fund. It is also worth nothing that these "champions of civil rights" have been in numerous trouble since then particularly the instigator Bell. One of them has kept out of trouble and went to a private school in New England. He seems to have turned his life around and I wish him well. Anyone can make a mistake. Still and all those boys were criminals and not the model citizens the NAACP and groups like them would like you to believe. Now how many people think the NAACP would not have thrown a fit and marched and called for boycotts had six white kids attacked a Negro kid? I don't think anyone intelligent without a racist agenda thinks there would not have been more of a blow up and I am sure there would have been hate crime charges had the victim been black. At first I thought extreme and a school yard fight and the kids were being treated excessive, but after learning the facts this clearly was and should have been treated as a hate crime.

Yet another example of this occurred in Knoxville, Tennessee that came to be known as the Knoxville horror. In this case two young white students from the University of Tennessee were out on a date. Channon Christian and Christopher Newsome were carjacked by four Negro thugs. They were tutored, raped and murdered. Despite the hate and brutal nature of the crime this was not prosecuted as a hate crime. The NAACP and other black leaders like the usually loudmouthed Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson did not decry this as a brutal hate crime. One NAACP leader when interviewed and challenged that if the victim had been black and perpetrators had been white all heck would have broke loose. That "gentleman" actually had the audacity to say that was not true and that there would not be any media coverage of it at all if the perpetrators had been white and the victims black. There was not much coverage of the Knoxville Horror as is because it goes against political correctness. The two victims were burnt, sodomized (yes even the guy), cut, beaten and forced to perform oral sex. The female actually had cleaner poured down her throat in an attempt to destroy evidence. Most of the suspects had been in jail before for violent crimes, so since they did not do anything like this when stealing a car before I think it's fair to assume they were so brutal with the victims because they were white. One of the persecutors had said on not charging them with hate crimes that all the men involved had dated white women so they could not be racist or hate white people. I will directly challenge that with this fact. There are almost no black men that would turn down free, cheap, easy, sex with a white woman that either had a racial identity crisis or had such low self-esteem that they would have them. We are not talking about black men here. Were are talking about a group of people who give credence to every stereotype that many carry against blacks, which is unfortunate because not all black men are like this. Fortunately they have all been taken off the street.

You can also consider this in the double standard the NAACP has regarding race and racism. During the assent ion of Barack Hussein Obama to the office that he was clearly not qualified for and he proves that again and again lately there was a clear case of blacks trying to intimidate voters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. They were members of the hate group The New Black Panther Party. They were hurling racial slurs at white people and some black people. A black Republican poll watcher was referred to as a "traitor" and "uncle Tom". I would bet he has more education than either of the party members. They were calling white people "crackers" and talking about "crackers being ruled by a black man". One of the men also had a nightstick. They did not know enough about history to know that if it were not for white people slavery would not have ended, blacks would not be able to vote and if enough white people did not vote for Obama he would never be President. I notice of the Black Panthers that they hate America. Burn American flags, have Africa badges all over them. I am curious how many of them were or have been raised on various public assistance programs. I also notice they stay here in the United States. If they love Africa so much they could possible help people in Africa back there. Charges were filed against them and it was a slam dunk case. The Obama justice department dropped the case. There are allegations coming to light that it was because the perpetrators were black and the justice department has no interest in pursuing hate crimes or civil rights violations when blacks are the perpetrators and white people are the victims. Now if the victims had been black and the Ku Klux Klan had been at a polling place there would have been all sorts of calls for hate crime and voter intimidation. Even if they just wore their robes and said nothing. This is clearly another case of a double standard of how the NAACP views racism. There was no outrage from them or even a condemnation of what the black panthers did. The same NAACP finds the time to brand anyone who does not agree with Obama and his tax and spend policies a racist though instead of talking about how he does not follow the will of the American people on things like Obamacare. As a side note I told my wife I wish I had been at that polling place to vote. Some barbaric elemental people are just like dogs. If they smell fear they will attack but if you stand your ground they prove they are yellow. There were only two of them. I would have shown that guy were to put that nightstick.

Also regarding Barack Hussein Obama it should not surprise many that the majority of blacks support him and follow him blindly. His polling numbers continue to go down with every group except the Negro. Yet white people are called racist instead of admitting Obama has done little if anything for the country that is really good. I do not know every black person, but I do live in a very diverse neighborhood and work with many blacks. I notice that kids and even members of the NAACP wearing those ridiculous shirts with Obama on them and things about him being the "first back President" or "My President is black". Anyone ever see white people wearing similar shirts when other Presidents were elected? Yet white people are accused more of racism. As I stated I don't know everyone black, but I honestly believe the majority of blacks voted for Obama because he was black and have been told that by many people including some white people who thought history being made was important. Many of these same people know nothing about the man other than "he is one of us" or "he wants change". It is funny if you ask the majority of what they think of abortion they will often think it is wrong. The same if often the case with gay marriage as demonstrated that over 60% of the blacks in California voted to ban gay marriage. Quite a few blacks also feel illegal aliens should not get amnesty and the government should not be able to force the government to buy a product. Yes these same people support Obama even though he supports all those things they are against including forcing them to buy insurance in Obamcare. A college survey was done ( I will not list the name for identity protection for the class and teacher) that polled 1000 blacks and asked them a couple 10 questions about Obama that most reasonably informed people would know about someone running for Office. I don't recall all the questions, but there were none that were unfair and someone should not be able to know if they fully supported him and knew about him as they claimed. Questions included things like which party does Obama represent ,What office does he currently hold, how many years has he been in the Senate, were did he go to college, and true false his running mate is Sarah Palin. It was basically a pass fail and you just had to get 70% right to pass. 600 people really did not know anything about him and these were all college educated Negroes in the sample. I would call that racist. The funny thing is that the way Obama is headed he could go down very unpopular except amongst blacks. I am positive if he goes down as the worst President ever if blacks will take ownership for helping to put him over the top.

While on the subject of politics the NAACP actively supports the Congressional Black Caucus. I will call this group the Klan with a tan. Their stated agenda is to further the Negro race (often at the expense of the white race) and they will not allow white members in the group. I am sure there would be a big controversy if there was a Congressional White Caucus. Obama and all other black members of congress who are often only there because they are in districts that are artificially drawn to help put them in congress are never called on belonging to this organization and they receive tax money. They are never considered a hate group by organizations who are supposed to be for racial equality like the Southern Poverty Law Center. I am not sure there are many more anti-American organizations than the SPLC except maybe the ACLU. The Congressional Black Caucus actually went as far as trying to have the Jena 6 pardoned. They never even condemned the actions of the Jena 6 almost like its ok for six savage kids to brutally attack a white kid unprovoked and keep beating him even after he was unconscious. I am curious if they would have acted the same had the young man died?

The NAACP also pushed for Obamacare not realizing that it could cost jobs and further taxes, but since statistically according to the NAACP black's make less money and whites will be paying for it I guess they think it is ok. Heck free healthcare is great if you don't have to pay for it. Many people do not feel you should be forced to buy anything, but that is what Obamacare will do short of action for the U.S. Supreme Court or a congressional repeal. It was Obama's idea so most blacks blindly agreed on it and viewed anyone against the bill a racist instead of simply not liking the bill. There were supposed to be people use used racial slurs against black law makers from gerrymandered districts and that was wrong, but you would think someone would have evidence of it. Yet these same blacks were voting against the will of the American people, the constitution, and in some cases even the will of their own district. You should expect people to be upset. Majority Whip Clyburn went as far to say "Democrats don't do things like this". Well he and the rest of the Congressional Black Caucus and most Democrats in general should realize that no other party has ever passed a bill like this that so many in the America public were against and was totally partisan, was over the wishes of the American people, and used procedural technicalities because of how much the American public was against the bill including elected a Republican to the long Democrat held seat previous occupied by Ted Kennedy. Many said Republican Scott Brown won that race because of how against Obamacare people were. There were other things in our history as a nation that were controversial like when social security was created and the civil rights act of 1964, but all had some degree of bi-partisan support and all did not have as much public sentiment nationwide against them. Another very interesting thing about Obamacare is that many Negroes claimed those who voted against it were racist. Well the only thing that was bi-partisan in the bill was opposition (in the house at least), and the fact that only one black lawmaker voted against it does not seem to bother the NAACP yet many lawmakers that were white voted for it. Also 95% of Negroes supported Obama (many not having a clue or knowing anything about him) yet only 55% of white people supported McCain. So which group is more to their own bordering on who is more racist?

One of the most troubling things about the NAACP and threat to America is their almost total support of illegal immigrants not being deported and getting amnesty. Now here is the funny thing that I am getting from sources like the NAACP and various state and federal agencies. More blacks in the U.S. are poor and live in poverty that whites. More blacks don't finish high school or go to college as whites do. Also blacks are much more likely to work in unskilled labor or service industries than whites. Now with that being the case it should be almost obvious that the illegal alien invaders are taking more jobs from blacks than they are from whites and that would be even worse with amnesty. The NAACP is hurting their own people in this case and many are too stupid to see it. Obama and most Democrats support amnesty because they want the Latino vote. They were the largest growing demographic group. I am sure part of that is in regards to many of the illegal invaders coming here are Latino and many Latinos breed like roaches if you look at birth rates. Heck with food stamps, WIC, and public housing if you have an anchor baby why would they not have any kids. They figure the former illegal alien invaders will vote liberal and in turn have a stranglehold on politics in this nation for a generation. Americans of all races who love this country will not stand for this as seen by the backlashes from it. Over 60% of Americans support the tough illegal immigration law in Arizona and a majority do not believe the Justice department, under the direction of Obama, should challenge the law. Obama once again proves he does not care about what the American public thinks or take his oath of office seriously unless it suits him. His oath does say to defend that Constitution from all enemies "both foreign and domestic" I would call illegal aliens with all the cost the country a foreign enemy especially with all the flack the Tea Party is given. Some black leaders have been brave enough to come out against the illegal invasion. There are areas of Los Angles, which used to have a large black population, that are being "overrun" by illegal alien invaders. Black people can't get jobs unless they speak Spanish or things like that. How they are being attacked and killed by Mexicans just for being black and in an area that the Mexicans felt they should not be in. Yet most black leaders and the NAACP are too stupid to realize this.

Here are some statistics of problems faced by the black community that are barely unchanged from a four year old college paper that I graded for a student.

".....70% of black births being to unwed mothers? 13% of the population is black yet 44% of the prison population is black and 37% are incarcerated for violent crimes. The drop-out rates for blacks is over 50%. Where is the outrage of the majority of black families being fatherless? The fact that 25% of blacks are at the poverty level vs the 12% national average for everyone else is an insult to this organization that is hiding behind their "advancement" logo for too long. However the other 75% are doing well with advancements in education, careers, politics and many other opportunities without any such organization. The majority of the blacks that keep whining about their plight with racism and bigotry are the ones who embrace the Rap cultures demeaning lifestyle and expect everyone else to feel sorry for them when their fantasy world of getting rich as a professional athlete or Rap star falls flat. "Keeping it real" and the "street cred" that is so important to many leads to murders, the N-word and treating their women as "bit@hes and hos"! This is a delusional and sick mind set that the NAACP has done NOTHING to alleviate. Name the last time Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Maxine Waters or the NAACP as a collective denounced their OWN people for their racism when they can call white people "whitey" or more insulting "crackers" and NO ONE OBJECTS!!!!! Rather they encourage it as a sign of their "unity"...........A PEW Research center poll showed that 66% of blacks agree with 75% of white Americans that poor people are too dependent on government. Basically a vast majority of the poor in this country need to stand in front of their own mirrors and see the real reason they are in the situation they find themselves in. They need to STOP believeing the Liberal Progressives who, for over 46 years since the Great Society and Civil Rights Act, have basically fooled them all into more destitution, poverty and self-destruction".

I must say that one of the most ironic things about the NAACP and groups like it is they do not realize or teach how the black man was able to get were they are in america today. The white man. How did blacks get free from lsavery? White men decided it should not exist. Some of this was for moral reasons but most of it was a way to disenfranchise the South with no real concern for the Negro. How did blacks get the right to vote? White men decided that they should be able to. How did Barack Obama accend to the Presidency? Enough white people donated money to the campaign and enough white people "including many with racial a identity crises and self-hating) voted for Obama and he won. If white people were that racist as the NAACP claims were would the black man be today? Also do you think if Abraham Lincoln and Lyndon B. Johnson could be brought back to life and spend a week in the United States today and then be transported back into their own times they would do the same things they did or rethink their actions?

With the clear double standard of how the NAACP judgtes white people and black people when it comes to race and hate crimes I think it is really inslulting for them to label the Tea Party a racist group. That is the pot calling the kettle black. I think what the NAACP fears is some white people are waking up and realizng that blacks should not get a pass based on previous things from history like slavery, but people should work, earn and get. It seems liberals are staunchly agaisnt working, earning and getting. They want to rob from one class of people to give to another. People fail to see all the things like affirmative action and endless hand outs and entitlement programs the government hand out is to keep the black man in modern slavery. If the government was going to cut welfare who do you think would be more likely to complain and say its not fair and racist the NAACP and Democrats or conservatives and Republicans? You know it would be the Democrats? Why? It is easy as long as they keep the black man dependent on various entitlements ( I know many white people are on them to but as a percentage of population more blacks are) then they can control their votes. With the growth in the hispanic population the black man will be abandoned by the liberals to use the hispanic vote the same way. Wake up people. What if I had been your child brutally attacked like Justin Barker, or you daughter raped in a savage way like Channon Chritianson?

Sources and for further reading.

CBS News philadelphia

News and further reading.

www.cbs3.com

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/13/tea-party-preempts-racist-resolution-condemns-bigoted-naacp/

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2010-07-15-1Ateaparty15_ST_N.htm

www.naacp.org

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/20/national/20blackmen.html

http://www.nacacnet.org/PUBLICATIONSRESOURCES/BOOKREVIEWS/REVIEWS/Pages/ClosingGap.aspx

www.slate.com

www.drugwarfacts.org

http://www.prisonpolicy.org/graphs/raceinc.html

bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov

http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/indicators08/ch2.shtml#ind8

http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/printer/542.html

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,974473,00.html

http://archives.michronicleonline.com/articlelive/articles/2118/1/More-Blacks-than-Whites-in-foster-care-system/Page1.html

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/births_deaths_marriages_divorces.html

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2010/tables/10s0084.pdf ( shows birth rates by race)