The NBA Finals are now over and many would consider the 2011 NBA Playoffs to be a successful few weeks. There were some surprises, some thrilling comebacks and in the end Lebron James and company ended up in the Finals against one of the best players that hasn't won a championship yet. Just because the 2011 NBA Playoffs were enjoyable does not mean there shouldn't be any changes next year. The NBA Playoffs need to borrow a page from the NHL playoffs and re-seed after each round.
The NBA regular season is already largely irrelevant because they let half the teams in the league take part in the playoffs. If a team can hover around .500 for the entire regular season and still have a shot a the championship then you're already urging fans to ignore the regular season. To ensure that the regular season is important the best thing the NBA can do'"other than change the number of playoff teams'"is to make the number one seed in the NBA Playoffs even more important than ever.
Currently the number one seed means playing the number eight seed'"usually the worst team in the conference'"in the first round and also receiving home court advantage throughout the playoffs. As long as the NBA doesn't re-seed teams after each playoff round the number one seed can run into some bad luck in the match ups.
For example, let's say the number one seed and number two seed both advance to the second round. The number one seed plays the winner of the fourth seed vs. the fifth seed while the second seed plays the winner of the third seed vs. the sixth seed. If the sixth seed upsets the third seed then no matter who the first seed plays'"the fourth or fifth seed'"the second seed is playing the worse team according to the regular season.
Why should the number one seed be punished after doing nothing wrong in the first round? The first seed could sweep their first round opponent and win every game by forty points and the second seed could barely get by in a seven game series and the second seed could still end up with the easier match up in the second round.
If there is re-seeding after each round then the first seed is guaranteed the favorable match up in each and every round.
The NBA regular season is already largely irrelevant because they let half the teams in the league take part in the playoffs. If a team can hover around .500 for the entire regular season and still have a shot a the championship then you're already urging fans to ignore the regular season. To ensure that the regular season is important the best thing the NBA can do'"other than change the number of playoff teams'"is to make the number one seed in the NBA Playoffs even more important than ever.
Currently the number one seed means playing the number eight seed'"usually the worst team in the conference'"in the first round and also receiving home court advantage throughout the playoffs. As long as the NBA doesn't re-seed teams after each playoff round the number one seed can run into some bad luck in the match ups.
For example, let's say the number one seed and number two seed both advance to the second round. The number one seed plays the winner of the fourth seed vs. the fifth seed while the second seed plays the winner of the third seed vs. the sixth seed. If the sixth seed upsets the third seed then no matter who the first seed plays'"the fourth or fifth seed'"the second seed is playing the worse team according to the regular season.
Why should the number one seed be punished after doing nothing wrong in the first round? The first seed could sweep their first round opponent and win every game by forty points and the second seed could barely get by in a seven game series and the second seed could still end up with the easier match up in the second round.
If there is re-seeding after each round then the first seed is guaranteed the favorable match up in each and every round.
Published by Lee Andrew Henderson
I was born, I wrote, I died. View profile
- 2010 NBA Finals: Los Angeles Lakers Vs. Boston CelticsThe Los Angeles Lakers and the Boston Celtics will meet in the 2010 NBA Finals. This will be the 12th meeting between these two teams in the NBA Finals. This article provides a preview and prediction of the 2010 NBA...
- NFL Picks Against the Spread Regular Season Record and RecapThe end of the NFL regular season can be depressing but it should be a time of looking forward. With a record of 29-15-2 there is still room for improvement but not a bad start heading into the playoffs.
- New York Giants Don't Want Longer NFL Regular SeasonThe NFL may move to a longer regular season in a few years. The New York Giants do not approve.
- 2010 NBA Finals: Lakers Vs. Celtics Game 5 PreviewThe Lakers and Celtics head into pivotal Game 5 of the 2010 NBA Finals tied at two games. The Lakers hope to win the battle of championship will and take a 3-2 series lead back to Los Angeles.
- Best 3 Regular Season Games of the Alabama Crimson Tide's 2009 Championship SeasonThe top three games of Alabama Crimson Tide football team's regular season and why.
- 2007 NBA Playoffs: Who Will Take This Years Championship?
- Preview of the 2008 ESPYS Hosted by Justin Timberlake
- The No.1 Vs. No.2 Seed in the NBA
- How to Start Tomato Plants from Seed
- West Michigan Whitecaps Serving Fifth Third Burger: The 5000 Calorie Burger
- NFL Preseason Week 4 Wrap Up (Complete Scores) - 2010 Regular Season Week 1 Preview
- The Case Against an 18 Game NFL Regular Season



