The United States has become dependent on other countries supplying us with the petroleum we need since we typically consume more than we produce. If we tried to be self-sufficient, we would only last about 20 years even if we developed all the potential domestic reserves that might be there. At the same time, world demand for oil is growing and world reserves are shrinking while climate change, caused by production of carbon dioxide, will force us to scale back our energy requirements or seek out new energy sources.
Renewable energy sources such as wind, geothermal, hydropower, solar, etc. can take up some of the slack but it is unlikely that they will be able to replace fossil fuel usage in the near term. Nuclear power could provide the energy necessary to move us away from fossil fuels. In the United States there is currently a popular aversion to nuclear power for a variety of reasons, some good and some bad. For nuclear power to expand the way it needs to in order to provide the energy required by the economy, these concerns would have to be addressed, and a sensible national nuclear policy would have to be mapped out.
First and foremost there must be a policy on waste disposal. A nuclear power plant produces power with little or no pollution, but the spent fuel is a highly dangerous material that requires special handling. Vitrification is probably the best technique to use for the final disposal since it fixes the contaminants in the glass matrix to prevent them from entering the environment. A disposal site must be set up and operating before a push to increase the numbers and capacities of nuclear facilities.
For such an expansion of nuclear to make economic sense, the plutonium produced should be extracted and reused as fuel. Using the plutonium as part of a mixed oxide fuel system would reduce the likelihood that terrorists could steal it and use it to make a bomb to a near impossibility.
To become energy independent and begin reducing emissions of greenhouse gases quickly with as little disruption of the economy as possible an expansion of nuclear power production in the United States is necessary and should begin as quickly as possible while giving due diligence to environmental concerns, safety issues and the operation of a long term waste storage system.
Published by Wayne Howard
Grew up in various places: Mississippi, Nevada, Japan, Guam. Attended college in MS, graduate school in MS and TX and worked in a variety of industries including Oil & Gas, Mineral & wood fiber products, an... View profile
- Wind Power Use in New York State is a Model for the NationWind power can provide a source of clean and efficient power if utilities, environmental officials, and landowners get together to promote its usage. In New York State several communities are successfully using wind e...
Plug-in Cars Pay for Rooftop Solar Power: Why Chevron Hates This IdeaNot only are plug-in Electric cars clean and avoid funding oil wars, but they can help fund clean solar power to charge them up.- Nevada Solar One - The Hybrid Car of the Solar Power GenerationA critical assessment of Nevada Solar One, a gargantuan electrical generation facility that bills itself as solar, when it only receives a solar assist for its generating capacity
Solar Power Advances Keep Coming in 2008A number of new advances, including a new energy conversion efficiency record, continue to make solar power more efficient and cost-effective.
Electric Rates Too High? Can a Home Solar Power System Help?Solar power systems for private homes are becoming more affordable as time goes by. Tax incentives make them even more so. The following provide some guidance on sizing a syst...
- Nuclear Power in America
- U.S. Energy Policy: Serving the Economy First
- Is the Sun Finally Rising on Solar Power?
- Iranian President Claims Nation Will Be Ninth Nuclear Nation
- Latest Incentives Designed to Curb Iran's Nuclear Enrichment Activities
- Relative Dangers of Nuclear Power
- Does North Korea Really Pose a Nuclear Threat?



