123

The OTHER Relic Radiation

Bryan Belrad
In honor of the first anniversary of the publication of "Testing the Big Bang", the book that laid the Big Bang Theory to rest once and for all, we are proud to present a never before released excerpt. You can learn more about this definitive work, and pick up your copy, at www.BelradUniverse.com

The Other Relic Radiation

The Big Bang Theory predicts that the energy unleashed in the moment of Creation should be detectable today, pervasive throughout the entire Universe. Though the Cosmic Microwave Background has already been shown to fail virtually every test for this predicted relic of the 'last scattering', as theologians are want to say, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.' To come closer to a firm conclusion, we must also consider other aspects of the nature of relic radiation. Specifically, we must consider the unspoken prediction of another kind of ancient radiation.

It has been firmly established that when intergalactic dust begins to collapse due to gravitational forces that it will, in keeping with Boyle's Law, become quite hot, reaching temperatures measured in millions of degrees. So hot, in fact, that it will emit X-rays. These X-rays have been detected emanating from the Inter-Galactic Medium of huge galaxy clusters.

Bearing this in mind, we may ponder the supposed "Dark Age" of the Universe, the period that the Big Bang Theory states came between the 'last scattering' and the ignition of the first stars. During this era, nearly all the galaxies that exist today would have formed out of the gaseous material resulting from the creation event itself, which, at that time, was even more densely packed than the IGM of the largest clusters today. Thus, in addition to an 'echo' of the Big Bang, we must also expect to find another relic radiation, also coming from all directions, that originated as X-rays during the intense period of gravitational collapse the formed the galaxies.

Since the Creation echo should have, according to theory, originally peaked somewhere in the visible spectrum, and these X-rays should have been emitted afterward, they would be redshifted to a lesser extent. Also, since the formation of the galaxies occurred over a vastly long time, we can predict that this other radiation should presently be visible over a vastly wide range of wavelengths, running from Ultraviolet, through the Visible, and into the near Infrared.

Obviously, this radiation has not been detected. Since it should exist, in part, in the Visible range of the spectrum, one would expect that it should be very easy to locate.

The lack of this variety of relic radiation, which should be detectable with the naked eye, were it real, presents strong evidence in the context of the Big Bang, that

A) most galaxies did not form at roughly the same time, and

B) could not have formed prior to the ignition of the first stars.

Both of these issues present critical problems for the Big Bang theory.

References:

Belrad, Bryan: The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, Lulu, 2006

Hinshaw, G.: Tests of the Big Bang: The CMB. NASA, 2005.

Lieu, Mittaz, and Shuang-Nan Zhang: The Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect in a sample of 31 clusters: A comparison between the X-ray predicted and WMAP observed decrement, Astrophysical Journal, September 1, 2006, Vol. 648, No. 1, p. 176

NASA: Evidence for the Big Bang, rst.gsfc.nasa.gov

Singh, Simon: Big Bang, Harper, 2005

Weinberg, Steven: The First Three Minutes, Bantam, 1977

Published by Bryan Belrad

The mind behind Zero Sum Theory, author of best-selling fiction and non-fiction, see what else he's up to on Facebook.  View profile

  • The formation of the first galaxies should have filled the universe with x-rays.
  • These x-rays should have been redshifted by cosmic expasion.
  • Today, we should see them, in part, in the visible spectrum. We do not.
Today, Big Bang's 'True Believers' are borrowing a phrase from Creationists: "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."

1 Comments

Post a Comment
  • eiffelvu2/3/2008

    wow, what a detailed and profound article...thanks so much

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.