The Police State Challenge

Chadd De Las Casas
I wrote a previous article entitled A Checklist of Oppressed Cultures: See if Yours Compares, where I rather clearly outlined a full checklist of the parameters that all oppressive, police states have. Naturally there was some disagreement with the notion, after all, one content producer informed me, why wait until those parameters are actually filled before protesting? I'd assume that, without evidence that we're in a police state, decrying the presence of one is a little absurd.

But despite the rather obvious absence of American fascism, the idea that we live in a dystopian 1984 style society persists. We live in a whole new world, I'm told, that is most like V for Vendetta, and that only by standing up to our government can we get our rights back. Naturally I scratch my head, because I haven't lost any of my rights for years, in fact I still carry on roughly the same routine I always have with little divergence. Neither myself nor anyone I know has ever disappeared into a black bag like those of Chancellor Sutler's, and neither of my siblings are required to chant Praise Bush songs and hymns or say prayers to him.

Nevertheless, the paranoia persists. It's all the same - 9/11 was an inside job, America is a police state, George W. Bush is worse than Hitler and so on and so on.

Therefore, I'm going to take the ultimate experiment. Rather than simply settle for the internet debate tactics, I'm going to carry out The Police State Challenge. I'm going to do a number of things that would get me truncheoned, thrown into the back of a truck, and disappeared in many other countries. Heck, in Myanmar they would probably get me shot, as recent evidence has shown.

Simple common sense would state that the Police State Challenge has already been passed and proven - after all, thousands of protests have been carried out since 2003, marching everywhere around the country, even outside the White House itself. These protests usually go unchallenged, save for when they're found without the required permits or when they become destructive.

Cindy Sheehan is even allowed to aspire to political office.

An opposition party was allowed to take over Congress, Bush has made no attempts at amending the Constitution to allow further term limits, and he has not strong armed Congress with anything more than his Constitutional veto.

But still people aren't convinced. So maybe, once and for all, my Police State Challenge will break any final doubts. Of course, I call into question the validity of these doubts, they're simply too convenient of positions to hold in a unique chance to live through a movement, a revolution where there does not need to be one. I don't blame them - sometimes I wish I could live through the days of ancient Rome. But I can't rebuild the Roman Republic for my fantasies, and liberals can't force America into a fascist police state for theirs.

So here it is, what I'm going to do to find out, once and for all, if we're living in 1984.

I'm going to:

First: Walk the length of my town at night.
Why: Because any good police state has a curfew and patrolmen/secret police to insure that I don't violate it.

Second: I'm going to tell a police officer that I hate Bush.
Why: Because after all, no agent of the government should be able to resist arresting me in a police state.

Third: I'm going to buy an anti-Presidential book
Why: Though I'm loathe to fund some of these authors, it's valuable to prove my point. So you win this round liberal authors.

Fourth: I'm going to write an anti-Bush blog.
Why: The NSA monitors the internet of course.

Fifth: I'm going to call my local congressman and tell him that I think the President is evil.
Why: Same as number two - no prominent party member of this fascist regime could handle me criticizing our glorious leader.

Sixth: I'm going to check some controversial books out of the library.
Why: Because the Patriot Act kills our freedoms don't ya' know.

Seventh: I'm going to go down to my local mosque armed with my copy of the Quran and partake in the services there.
Why: Because these are such hot spots of government abductions.

We'll see how it goes.

Published by Chadd De Las Casas

I was born in Valencia, California in 1987. It's ironic that I turned out to be a writer, since my first exposure to it was an essay about why I hate writing. I am also the owner of the Content Producers Wiki.  View profile

  • America is not living in a police state.
  • The idea of a fascist America is a fantasy.
The fact that we can be accused of living in a police state when Buddhist monks are being shot for protesting peaceably is shameful. Simply shameful.

22 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Chadd De Las Casas11/13/2007

    So what you're trying to tell me is that I have to take everyone's word for it - we're losing our freedoms and liberties, there's just no proof and I have to assume that everyone's right. I will never know it, even if I go out of my way, I just have to fight a power that isn't impeding me in any way and shows no signs of itself.

  • The Minus Factor11/13/2007

    MasterPro- I agree completely, except that you say these people are "otherwise intelligent people," which I STROGLY disagree with. They are immature children, who expect their parent (i.e. the Government) to take care of them. That isn't just lazy, it is stupid.

  • The Minus Factor11/13/2007

    Alyce does make excellent points, and in response to people telling her to leave if the country is so bad, that is simply looking away from our problems. This country was GREAT. It is still good, but to fix these problems, they must be addressed. Our country can be great again, but it take realization of the problems we face, not assuming everything is "fine."

  • The Minus Factor11/13/2007

    Just because you are able to continue YOUR routines doesn't mean that rights are not being taken (drugs, motorcycle helmets, seat belts, etc.) away or given unjustly (abortion, Jena 6, all hate crimes). While I am okay with any state instituted laws, as I believe in states right's, too many liberties are being taken away in the name of protecting citizens from themselves, which is NOT the governments role, especially the federal government.

  • Chadd De Las Casas11/13/2007

    Shanika - the problem is that the implication of your comments is that police have never abused their power at any other point in American history, or that we've never had a point of "restrictions" on seemingly absurd things. The Prohibition comes to mind on both fronts.

  • Chadd De Las Casas11/13/2007

    No, there are no varying degrees Carol. We either live in an absolute tyranny under a new King George where our very lives are suspect and we must live in fear, or we don't. The fact is, the gauntlet was thrown down by the Left, the claim has been made that we live in a dystopian 1984 society. Either we do or we don't, there is no in-between.

  • Carol Bengle Gilbert11/13/2007

    So, how did it go? I fear the police are more likely to think you're losing it for doing those things rather than an enemy of the state. I also think you are glossing over the degrees of state control. Maybe this is not a police state, but our citizenry is certainly less free than it used to be.

  • Shanika11/13/2007

    Police and other officials abuse power all of the time. On a weekly basis, I see a cop not use their turn signal. While that might seem small, that same cop would easily pull me over for the same thing.

  • Shanika11/13/2007

    Alyce makes some great points. We are a much freer country than most but it doesnt mean that we arent steadily losing our freedoms. It took me 26 years to realize that each year the government makes more and more decisions for us, often in the name of safety. This does not make them unlike other governments, however that does not negate the problem. There is little that our government should be deciding for us. Motorcycle helmets, smoking bans and other seemingly "unimportant" laws are further testament that if it were up to the government, they would dictate all aspects of how American people live their lives.

  • Clark Richards11/11/2007

    More great insights - I don't believe you only 20 something. The only good thing I can see coming from Alyce are page views, although she does make me laugh.

Displaying Comments
Next »

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.