The, "Bill of Rights," established by the first meeting of the United States Constitution, passed in December 15, 1791. It originally consisted of ten amendments stating what our country believed in. It represented America, a country welcoming a melting pot of diversity.
The first amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." http://archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
The pros of having the first amendment in place are that we have the freedom to express our opinions in this country, share our opinions with others, and follow individual faiths. We also have the freedom to vote and express our views to our government, without fear of being jailed or tortured for our beliefs. That is, as long as we abide by the legal laws of our states.
As a writer, freedom of speech is one right we consider being most important. Writers can create and share ideas, enjoying creative freedom without being governed or denied. Writers may not always agree with each other's viewpoints but understand how important it is to have the right to express them. Comedians can write material choosing anyone to be the brunt of their jokes. Newspapers can print the news as they see it.
We can also for the most part follow our individual faiths and religions in this country without fear of being harmed. We can join organizations that share our beliefs. For the most part we can select the schools we choose to send our children to.
The cons of having the first amendment in place are that it also can bring out voices of hate, hate mongers. Some individuals use the first amendment to spread hatred and slander. Race and religious differences can initiate bitter controversy and violence in our country, also throughout the world. Wars are fought because of racial and religious differences by radicals. People speaking out, expressing their freedom of speech can spew negative behavior among those who disagree.
We all know about America's past history, which included disturbing violent expressions of freedom of speech. Cross burnings, lynching, church and synagogue burnings, and bombings. In the past there have been incidents of book burnings and book banning against authors who people believed broke moral codes. Music has even been banned in public due to the believed immoral standard music provoked. At times groups have formed to protest violently and hatefully express their freedom of speech against certain races, religions, or politics. Politicians run bitter campaigns and have negative verbal outbursts due to disagreements in their political beliefs. All have stood up for their first amendment rights.
Today there is a verbal first amendment controversy going on in New York and other parts of the country concerning a religious building being constructed. Both viewpoints are expressing their freedom of speech. One man's religious viewpoint, Rev. Terry Jones, has expressed his negative viewpoint on the controversy by reporting he will burn a religious book of faith. Again he has people expressing their pro and con viewpoints on his first amendment rights.
There are no specific guidelines to when expressing one's first amendment rights should be encroached on or limited. I believe having freedom of speech should automatically come with some form of standards or decency, intended so no-one forcefully inflicts their opinions on others to a point of abuse, personal degradation, or physical harm. Marching and speaking out for personal and civil rights should be performed in a non-violent manner. But then again who has the right to govern our individual first amendment rights? Limiting our first amendment rights delete what they were initially meant to stand for in our country.
The first amendment and the, Bill of Rights, will remain an important part of what America stands for. As American citizens we should accept this right as a gift. So many other countries don't understand or accept this unique gift.
To obtain further information about our, "Bill of Rights," please click on the link below.
http://topics.law.cornell.edu/constitution/billofrights or http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/First_amendment
The End
Published by Claire Luna-Pinsker
I'm an author and writer, retired pediatric nurse, mother and wife, educated in the school of life. I started writing stories using spelling words in elementary school. My teacher's encouragement helped deve... View profile
- The Debate Over the First AmendmentCan a citizen's First Amendment rights be removed?
- Cops TV Show- First Amendment Rights ViolationMore victims of Bill of Rights violations on cable TV.
- Eliminating Prayer in Public Schools is a Violation of Our First Amendment Rights!The principal and athletic director at Pace High School in Florida face criminal charges for praying in school.
- Teenagers and First Amendment Rights: Dress IssuesPerhaps the best answer is to demand a dress code in all schools, whether public or private.
How to Be Politically Correct in the Workplace - Without Losing Your Fir...This presentation concentrates on how employees can express their views in a diverse environment without crossing the line into being offensive.
- Dr. Laura Schlessinger Will Stop Doing Radio Talk Show - First Amendment Rights Th...
- Interpreting the Freedom of Expression - First Amendment
- When the First Amendment Crosses the Line, Online
- Dr. Laura Quits on Larry King Live to Regain Her First Amendment Rights
- Sarah Palin Fights Against First Amendment Rights in Alaska
- Dr. Laura to End Radio Show, Wants Back First Amendment Rights (Video/Audio)
- Suppression of First Amendment Rights on College Campuses





7 Comments
Post a CommentWe need to keep discussing what freedom of speech means (no pun intended.) We have more detail in Jefferson's letters, but there is still a lot of room for interpretation. I would still like to err on the side of giving people too much freedom in this case.
Well said, Claire. It's a shame that this topic is so controversial, being the first topic in our Constitution. We should all be able to express our point of view, without the threat of hate or violence.
Very well stated.
A topic we need to discuss. Freedom of speech for all I agree gives nuts a way to spew their garbage, but we can't deny this amendment.Good one.
I appreciate the detail of this most riveting topic. I see the pros and cons of both side. I would like to think that I can respect someone else's point of views without having violence and hatred attached to it. Excellent and well-written Claire.
Addendum to my essay. ABC news just reported, Rev. Terry Jones announced he agreed to halt the burning of the Koran on 9/11 because he is going to meet with the proposed mosque developer in NY. Details aren't confirmed yet.
We have freedom just like we have free will, Claire. There will always be those who step over the bounds and abuse the freedom. I still wouldn't want to live in any other country in the world. cheers :)