Should We Have the Right to Believe Whatever We Want?
I enjoy the right to believe in whatever seems reasonable to me; in fact nobody can really take this away from me. Now it could be argued that my beliefs have been completely determined by my environment and if I had been born in a different place they would have been completely different. I am not so sure about this; most of my beliefs today bear little relation to my childhood beliefs. I think that humans are intelligent enough to choose things for themselves; even if that choice is to go along with everyone else. I value my right to believe so it is only reasonable that other people should have this same right.
The Reasonableness of Beliefs
If people are allowed to believe in what they want then the question needs to be asked as to whether there should be any limits on this. Should a belief have to reach a certain threshold of reasonableness? The atheist would claim that all religions are unreasonable, but is what they believe any more reasonable than anything else? Even those who claim to be skeptics are very prickly then their beliefs are brought into question.
In one way the atheist is right, there are some things which are less likely to be true than others. A reasonable person would probably agree that there as much real evidence for a belief system like Scientology as there is for other religions; the only difference really being the age of the system and the number of followers. On the other hand, anyone who believes in any set of ideas will see them as completely reasonable. The atheist is as attached to their beliefs as anyone else; and they are blinded by them too. Unfortunately belief in one thing often involves not believing in something else; it involves closing doors.
The fact is that belief is a personal matter and so is proof. There are followers of the different religions who have had personal revelations that are evidence enough to convince them; they don't need science to prove or disprove anything. Science has brought us many wonders but it is a system of beliefs that is not value free. Humans conduct scientific experiments so their beliefs will also interfere with what they find. It is highly likely that today's scientists will seem primitive to people in a hundred year's time.
Attraction not Promotion
I feel that it is important for people to be allowed to believe in what they feel is reasonable. I personally feel uncomfortable sometimes with missionaries, because I don't like the idea of one set of people trying to force their ideas onto another. I became interested in Buddhist philosophy in my teens but this was not due to somebody trying to convert me; I needed to seek the information out myself. It is my view that people should be free to investigate any religion they want, but there is no need to push anything on anyone else; especially if this involves any type of financial coercion. Mind you, it could be fairly argued that there is a lot of good work done by missionaries around the world.
The Important of Doubt
I feel that it is important to have at least some doubt as to our own beliefs. This does not mean that we need to approach our own religion or philosophy with less enthusiasm; just that we leave the door slightly ajar for other people. We can say, "hey, maybe they are right, but this is what I'm going with". That way all of us humans can find some common ground.
The case of holocaust denial
Holocaust denial is one belief that really makes me uncomfortable. I don't think that there is much to be done to stop people from believing in this, but it is probably important to stop it. There are probably very few people left who actually witnessed the holocaust, but the motives for people spreading this idea is almost always to increase hatred.
My Beliefs
I am philosophically a Buddhist, but I'm not a religious Buddhist. I would change my beliefs instantly if something else seemed more reasonable. The foundation of my own personal belief system is "who knows?" If a belief adds value to my life then that is good enough for me; I would imagine it is the same for many people.
Published by Garro
I was born in Ireland, spent my twenties in England, and now live in Thailand. I work as a freelance writer, but I'm also a qualified nurse. I have one book published and another one due for release next year. View profile
- An Ethics Case Study on the Right to Die and the Withdrawal of Medical TreatmentThis essay provides a case study on the right to die based on major ethical theories such as utilitarianism, duty based ethics and virtue based ethics, as well as an in depth looks at the ethical dilemmas surrounding...
American Flag: The Right to BurnOp-ed piece discussing the right to burn the American flag.- Questioning the Right to DieWe live in a world that doesn't recognize the right to die. Should one be allowed to commit the ultimate act of suicide? Who's right is it anyway?
- Euthanasia and the Right to DieAs long as non-voluntary and involuntary types of euthanasia are treated as felonies, it seems safe to allow patients to exercise their personal autonomy and grant them the right to die.
- Analyzing the Right to Die MovementAn article analyzing the right to die movement
- You Don't Have the Right to Not Be Offended
- Should Everyone Have the Right to Be a Parent?
- The Necessity of Capital Punishment to Enforce the Right to Life
- The Right to Believe
- Judging Others: Do We Have the Right to Judge Others?
- Should a Woman Have the Right to Choose Abortion?
- Should Women Have the Right to Choose Abortion?



