The Role of Fortinbras in Shakespeare's Hamlet
A Man on a Mission: Fortinbras Untold!
A good number of plays has a central character who is seeking an item they think is rightly deserved to them. Fortinbras happens to be the character whom fits this mold. He is seeking the land of Denmark that his father lost via the defeat by Hamlet Sr. in battle. Phasing him out of the play itself would decrease the element of competition and comparison between himself and hamlet. Fortinbras is simply seeking to gain the control of the land he think he deserves. He also serves as Hamlet's nemesis throughout the story seeking to triumph over him. Those are what make him a man on a mission.
The emergence of Fortinbras comes about in the beginning of Act 4. His quest begins with a trip to the coast of Denmark to ask for access to a piece of land in the middle of Denmark. The land ends up being worth nothing more than a few coins. Hamlet basically tells to the face of Fortinbras and his accompying army that battle and the potential loss of life are not worth all the trouble. "Two thousand souls and twenty thousand ducurs will not debate the question of this straw. This is th' impostume of much wealth and peace, that inward breaks, and shows no cause without why the man dies. I humbly thank you sir." (IV.iv.25-29) As you can see, Hamlet is not about to lose lives over this puny piece of land. This ordeal brings to a close the first installment in Fortinbras' quest for land in Denmark.
The purpose in this action of Fortinbras is clearly shown. His purpose in this piece is to simply get what he thinks is deserving of him and to take advantage of the landscape after the royal family itself implodes and things are not the same. He takes clear advantage of the altered landscape by taking over the land of Denmark and proclaiming the downfall of Hamlet and the land to everybody. He also recalls the early memories he once had of this land "Let us haste to hear it, And call the noblest to the audience. For me, with sorrow I embrace my fortune. I have some rights of memory in this kingdom, Which now to claim my vantage doth invite me." (V.ii.372-375) His feelings of looking back, a sense of closure and redemption all come to him. In the end, his overall plan is accomplished and Denmark falls to him at the hands of the destroyed royal family.
In this epic tale, Fortinbras seeks victory after Hamlet Sr. finished off his father at in battle. Emerging in the second half of the piece gives off a sense that he may eventually seek revenge over Hamlet for what happened in the past. Call him the one out to topple the main character whom inherited the conflict and rivalry from their forefathers before them. Fortinbras waits in the wings while the whole family conflict comes into play and the royal family falls apart at the seams. Laertus, Ophelia and eventually Hamlet all pass away leading up to Fortinbras making his triumphant entrance into Norway to announce his victory over his arch rival and the consequence of the royal family's implosion. "This quarry cries on havoc. O proud Death, what feast is toward in thine eternal cell, that thou so many princes at a shot so bloodily hast struck?" (V, ii, 349-352) This shows that Fortinbras took a step back and did not strike until Hamlet was at his lowest and weakest point. His conquest finally did turn into a reality with the kingdom now in the palm of his hands.
Taking Fortinbras out of this play would have an effect on the whole play itself. He adds an element of the enemy who is clearly out to change things and get what they are so much looking for. Fortinbras also serves as the equal to Hamlet with whom actions and results of those actions are measured upon and compared to. "Young Fortinbras, with conquest came from Poland, to th'ambassadors of England gives this warlike volley." (V.ii.335-336) He was known throughout the land for his conquest and also what he was exactly trying to accomplish. At the end when the royal family falls and Hamlet is no more, who would take over the disenfranchised land with an absence of a ruling family who can keep it together and successfully rule the kingdom? It was Fortinbras with his clear motive, direction and will to succeed. It sounds like this man completed his mission after all.
William Shakespeare, Shakespeare: Second Edition, ed. Constance Jordan (New York: Person Longman 2005). 103,147,148.
Published by Max Power
Casey Treat: a Man on a MissionMinister Casey Treat Opens up a new church facility in Washington state. Learn about his ministry and future goals.
Join Your Teen on a Mission TripWorking with your teenage son or daughter to help others can have life-long benefits for all.- Mega Man X Command Mission: SupercondensedMega Man X: Command Mission is the first game in the series to use a full RPG format. Never played it and wondering what it's about? Come sit around the campfire as I make fun of it!
- Dead Man's Shoes DVD Review: Paddy Considine's PaybackPaddy Considine plays the lead role and also co-wrote the script, and while he's far from a household name in the US he puts in a bravura performance here that goes a long way toward cementing his well-deserved lead s...
- Liberty City Learning Center in Miami on a MissionSam Mason's center is free, open to the public, holds daily classes, and is a big asset to Miami's impoverished Liberty City neighborhood
- Lessons in Friendship from Shakespeare's Hamlet
- Shakespeare and the Romans
- Deception in Hamlet
- Viola and Olivia as Parallel Characters in Shakespeare's Twelfth Night
- Hamlet and Tamburlaine: Powerful Performances
- The Many Faces of Claudius, from William Shakespeare's Hamlet
- Out of Time : Denzel Washington Is A Man On a Mission
- Fortinbras' quest
- character description
- indepth analysis
17 Comments
Post a CommentRELEASE THE PENGUINS!
Fortinbras serves as a foil to Hamlet and to Laertes. Fortinbras is calculated, Hamlet is suppressed, and Laertes is too emotional.
Fortinbras (Jr) took a vow neither to avenge his father's death nor to attack Denmark, as reported by the ambassador to Norway:
[Old Norway] sends out arrests
On Fortinbras; which he, in brief, obeys;
Receives rebuke from Norway, and in fine
Makes vow before his uncle never more
To give the assay of arms against your majesty. (Hamlet II.ii.72-76)
Although it is normal to mock this vow as insincere(as in Branaghs film version), this interpretation shows a profound lack of understanding of the theological and moral climate of Shakespeares culture. His audience would have assumed that Fortinbras vow was both sincere and absolutely binding.
Fortinbras' role was thus as a foil to both Hamlet and Laertes. They sought to avenge their fathers' deaths and died in the attempt; he forswore vengeance, lived, and inherited a kingdom.
(Hmmm, that cut off early below ...). To continue my point: once he gets over his surprise at his unbelievably good luck, Fortinbras is really sardonic and self- mocking with false humility when he says 'with sorrow I embrace my fortune.' Lucky day: he gets not only passage but also more territory, without lifting a finger, because the throne of Denmark has self-destructed.
And to the jerk below: this is a forum for the literate; fools need not apply. Sure, you're free to choose to be deliberately stupid, but I wouldnt' brag about it (thus advertising the degree of your inanity). Suck on *that,* Dude.
Hamlet is introspective -- to a fault, it seems -- and slow to act, knowing that to dethrone a sitting king, even one who has taken the crown by murder, is no small thing. He marvels that his father's ghost should push him to it. Fortinbras, on the other hand, is hotheaded and impulsive -- swift, decisive, and unthinking, if you will (thus the parody of George W. Bush in this century's play of the same name) -- and a polar opposite to Hamlet. Both princes seek to avenge their fathers, Hamlet through deviousness, Fortinbras through straighforward warfare. The contrast is glaring, but so is the ironic result: Hamlet ends up shedding far more blood, including his own, and by waiting ends up losing the entire kingdom to an only tangentially involved foreigner, whereas Fortinbras the warlike ends up getting additional territory *and* passage across Denmark without having to shed so much as a drop of blood. And I disagree that he is sorry he 'didn't get to kick ass;' rather, I think his
First of all, Fortinbras tells Hamlet that he is trying to take a piece of land from Poland, not Denmark. Second, you missed the point of the character. Re-read the play.
"Whom" is not an upgraded version of "who." I advise checking out the difference between subject and object pronouns.
what book were u reading lol
Umm, Joe. Go back and READ Hamlet, please.
you really pulled this one out of your arse
The role of Fortinbras is to highlight Hamlet's 'inaction' and the constant moral dilemma we see him struggling with. Fortinbras sweeps in and seems to effortlessly gain his rewards.
We learn that Fortinbras has come to seek back the land that his father lost to Old Hamlet. It seems ironic that Fortinbras succeeds in his task and manages to take the land back out of Hamlet's hands. By the end of the play, in terms of history, Old Hamlets vistory has 'undone itself', so to speak; this adds to the theme tragedy, knowing that Hamlet, eventhough he managed to pluck up the courage to finally take his revenge, he will never get to be the great king his father was.