The Sherman Act, as amended by the Clayton Act, seeks to preserve competition by declaring two types of anticompetitive behavior illegal. These two types are Contracts in restraint of trade or commerce and monopolies and attempts to monopolize. The Sherman Act was general and did not define trust, monopoly, or restraint of trade. Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits contracts, combinations, and conspiracies in restraint of trade or commerce.
Contracts in restraint of trade result from verbal or written agreements and combinations usually result from conduct, while conspiracies are established by agreement and then by some act of following out the agreement of conspiracy. Contracts may be implied to be considered a restraint of trade. An example of a restraint of trade is price fixing, which is when competitors agree to charge the same price for a product. These actions are anticompetitive and put a restraint on trade. In these cases, circumstantial evidence may be used to prove a conspiracy. For example, if three liquor stores all raise the price on a certain alcohol products on the same day during a time of declining sales, it is pretty obvious what is going on; price0-fixing.
Monopoly and the attempts to monopolize any part of interstate commerce or foreign commerce are illegal according to the Sherman Act. The law makes it clear and has the means to break up monopolies and to stop others from becoming monopolies. Monopoly cases require proof that there has been an attempt to destroy their competition or gain monopoly power. These cases tend to be very hard to prove and that is why there are not very many of these cases.
Antitrust laws are enforced by the federal and state governments. The federal governments enforcement procedures are utilized by the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) and the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice has the power to enforce the criminal process, but it shares its civil law enforcement powers with the FTC.
Contracts in restraint of trade result from verbal or written agreements and combinations usually result from conduct, while conspiracies are established by agreement and then by some act of following out the agreement of conspiracy. Contracts may be implied to be considered a restraint of trade. An example of a restraint of trade is price fixing, which is when competitors agree to charge the same price for a product. These actions are anticompetitive and put a restraint on trade. In these cases, circumstantial evidence may be used to prove a conspiracy. For example, if three liquor stores all raise the price on a certain alcohol products on the same day during a time of declining sales, it is pretty obvious what is going on; price0-fixing.
Monopoly and the attempts to monopolize any part of interstate commerce or foreign commerce are illegal according to the Sherman Act. The law makes it clear and has the means to break up monopolies and to stop others from becoming monopolies. Monopoly cases require proof that there has been an attempt to destroy their competition or gain monopoly power. These cases tend to be very hard to prove and that is why there are not very many of these cases.
Antitrust laws are enforced by the federal and state governments. The federal governments enforcement procedures are utilized by the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) and the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice has the power to enforce the criminal process, but it shares its civil law enforcement powers with the FTC.
State government may also bring charges under the Sherman Act to enforce antitrust laws, while private parties can bring civil lawsuits to seek monetary damages while trying to enforce antitrust laws. Private parties may include businesses or simply individuals seeking to enforce antitrust laws.
sources
Reed, Shedd, Morehead, and Corley
The legal and regulatory environment of business
Published by JLC
stay at home mom View profile
- Dominick T. Armentano's Arguments for the Repeal of All Antitrust Laws: Part IIMr. Stolyarov continues to present Dominick Armentano's case against antitrust laws - including eight reasons why antitrust laws should be repealed and an analysis of three different views of antitrust.
- Dominick T. Armentano's Arguments for the Repeal of All Antitrust Laws: Part IIIIn Chapter 5 of Antitrust: The Case for Repeal, Dominick Armentano discusses antitrust policy toward price discrimination, tying, and vertical mergers. Mr. Stolyarov explains Armentano's case for why antitrust restric...
- Historical American Antitrust Policy Regarding Horizontal Mergers: The Brown Shoe...Horizontal mergers are mergers between firms who are direct competitors. Two key events in the history of American antitrust policy's approach toward horizontal mergers are the Brown Shoe Case, decided in 1962, and th...
- Concepts in Industrial Organization: Tying Agreements and Antitrust Cases Regardin...Mr. Stolyarov describes the nature of tying agreements and how three famous historical antitrust cases - the American Can Company Case (1950), the Jerrold Case (1960), and the Hyde Case (1984) - approached them.
- U.S. Says 'enough' to China Trade Surplus, Threatens TariffsThe global Chinese trade picture is more complicated than most realize. The US Congress, however, is taking action, trying to force China's hand in the way that makes sense to US legislators.
- Dominick T. Armentano's Arguments for the Repeal of All Antitrust Laws
- Dominick T. Armentano's Arguments for the Repeal of All Antitrust Laws: Part V
- The Origin of Two Functions in the Regulation of Healthcare
- Key Acts, Cases, and Concepts in American Antitrust History
- Antitrust Action Will Become Common
- Monopolies and Antitrust Laws - The Microsoft Case
- Dominick T. Armentano's Arguments for the Repeal of All Antitrust Laws: Part IV
- The Sherman Act preserves competition by making 2 types of anticompetitive behavior illegal.
- These 2 behaviors are contracts in restraint of trade and monoploies.
- Antitrust laws are enforced by the FTC and Dep. of Justice.



