1.Clarity. The first test that a philosophy must pass is conceptual clarity. If the claim is not clear, then you do not know exactly what is being proposed. For instance, suppose philosopher states, "The only thing in life that matters is beauty." He must clarify what is meant by beauty. Beauty is objective, so clarification of certain terms may be necessary.
2.Consistency. The second test that a philosophy must pass is consistency. Rather, the philosophical statement cannot contradict itself. For instance, a philosopher could say, "I am determined, but I have free will." However, that statement contradicts itself and needs to be revised to be more consistent. Either that or the terms determined and free will should be defined differently.
3.Coherence. The third test that a philosophy must pass is coherence. The philosophy needs to "fit together." For instance, a famous philosopher, Rene Descartes argued that humans are made up of a physical body and a nonphysical mind (separate from the brain). However, he failed to clarify how these two different things interact together. How can the physical and nonphysical interact? Consequently there has been a never-ending debate upon his philosophy.
4.Comprehensiveness. The fourth test that a philosophy must pass is comprehensiveness. A philosophy that makes sense will be favored over one that does not. A philosophy that explains itself over a broad spectrum will fair better than one that only explains one area of phenomena. For instance, a philosophy that makes sense when considered scientifically, morally, and religiously will be more comprehensive than one that only makes sense scientifically.
5.Compatibility. The next test that a philosophy needs to pass is compatibility. Is the philosophy compatible with proven facts and well-established theories? After all, a good philosophy is one that seeks to unify our knowledge and understanding. However, if the philosophy contradicts common sense or scientifically proven facts, no matter how good an argument it poses, it is not a very good philosophy.
6.Compelling Arguments. The last test that a philosophy must pass is that it must have the support of compelling arguments. Philosophers make many different conflicting claims about what is true. Therefore, they must have compelling arguments as to why their view is correct one. They must provide good reasons that convince you that their philosophy is the truth.
These six criteria are what to evaluate philosophical claims on. By employing these six tests, choosing a philosophy that you agree with will become much easier.
Published by Phantom Rose
Phantom Rose is an author, a freelancer and a Phan! Published work: Maiden's Blush View profile
Book Review: an Introduction to Psychology of ReligionAn Introduction to Psychology of Religion is not a religious book. It is a book of psychology about religion. Although religion and theology were touched on and covered, it wa...- Six Sigma MethodologyThis article provides a brief introduction and general information that you need to review before undertaking any training in Six Sigma.
- Effects of Two Different Styles of Writing: Philosophical and PoeticalUsing rules of grammar, sentence structure, examples, and examination, I endeavor to show how two different styles of writing--philosophical and poetical--contribute to overall expression and experience.
- Jean Baudrillard, the Hyper-Real, and Scientific Realism in Philosophy of ScienceAn undergraduate college philosophy paper on Jean Baudrillard and Scientific Realism
- An Evaluation of the Philosophy of ThoreauA look at Thoreau's philosophy applied to today's world as well as compared to a biblical world view.
- An Critical Philosophical Examination of the Road to War in Iraq
- Logical Inconsistency Vs. Self-Referential Inconsistency
- Qualitative Research in Education: A Critical Review of Qualitative Studies
- The Capitalist Belief System is Killing All of Us
- The Most Effective Debate Formats: Karl Popper Method
- Reiterate Reform or Self Destruct? Horrors of Child Abuse
- Why Ban Smoking in Public Places?: Arguments in Favor
