The life that Frankenstein's monster led promotes the idea that such personal, painful disasters must be prevented. Abortions should be used only to spare fetuses future misfortunes and grueling mental and physical pain. Doctor Frankenstein could have performed an "abortion" on his creation, but his decision against an end to the being led to the creature's mental, emotional, and physical breakdown. The issue which the novel uncovers relates only to abortions of necessity, not personal preference. Every person is characterized by his or her independence and freedom. However, a terminal illness that results in a person's inability to become a part of society becomes a burden that very few would want to carry.
When a person's persona is judged by his disabilities, the individual recognizes himself and thinks of himself in terms of his imperfection and the incompleteness which he bears. This idea relates to the consequences which Doctor Frankenstein should have considered when creating his monster. An aborted creature would have resulted in the sparing of the Doctor's life, the lives of his loved ones, and the monster's unconquerable suffering. The same applies to the preventive actions that can spare a being or family from internal destruction from misery.
Published by I.Maslov
Writing and exploring anything from politics, news, current events, religion, history, or economics to literature and science. View profile
- Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Partial Birth Abortion
- The Abortion Issue
- All About Mary J. Blige - Strong, Educated Queen of Hip Hop
- Different Perspectives in Shelley's Frankenstein
- "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" Vs. Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein"
- What Does the Bible Say About Abortion? Nothing
- A Marxist Look at the Ambivalence Toward Revolution in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein



