The Three - Wait Two - Nooses of Jena: An Outrage - Apparently Not

Chadd De Las Casas
As reported by the Associated Press, the two nooses that were hung from the fabled oak tree in Jena, Louisiana were not taken down out of any sort of outrage felt. This had long appeared to be the case, but with a proverbial Spanish Inquisition bearing down on every hint of dissent towards the Jena story the reports were few and far between. Many persons have recently called into question the validity of the racial statement attributed to these pieces of rope however - as some Jena residents have reported that the "white tree" inquiry may very well have had nothing to do with the nooses.

One Paul of Jena, Louisiana explains that he did not believe the nooses to have anything to do with racism - but rather that it was a part of the "beat the Cowboys" football theme that had been going on that week. Indeed the entire week had seen persons wearing anti-cowboy apparel, and he reports that the oak tree had been the site of many a school prank designated for cross-school rivalries. In this case, Paul says, it was seen more of the "hang 'em high" look - inappropriate yes, threatening no, ill-timed, obviously.

But perhaps the most important part of the Associated Press's revelations is that there was no initial student outrage about the nooses. While one were to listen to any of the Jena Six defenders on the incident, one would imagine that the town immediately exploded into a feeling that the struggling black man is being forced into the poll tax and lynchings of yore.

Rather, the school reports, the nooses were taken down because of the health risk and distraction they caused. Students, the school says, were literally swinging on them as they would rings on a playground, or even putting their necks through them in jocular fashions (much the same way the white tree inquiry was made).

To further add fuel to this fire, it has been reported that the students involved in the noose hanging were only suspended for three days - for a hate crime allegation this would seem decidedly soft, some would report (as they have). What is never pointed out, however, is that the students had spent a month in an alternative school as their fates were decided. Some readers may see this as lenient - but as someone who was forced to endure an alternative school it can safely be stated that this is no light punishment.

This transforms the initial ire felt towards the seemingly weak punishment into a sudden burst of clarity: the light punishment was the final stage of an already ongoing consequence.

This is often, of course, neglected or added upon to in the zeal to transform Jena, Louisiana into the next Birmingham - fortunately, however, reasonability still seems to have a hold on some people of the United States, who won't allow "trivial" details like student backgrounds, facts, and numbers (such as there only being two nooses instead of three) get thrown away as easily as those who see this as their chance to live in the glory days of Martin Luther King.

Published by Chadd De Las Casas

I was born in Valencia, California in 1987. It's ironic that I turned out to be a writer, since my first exposure to it was an essay about why I hate writing. I am also the owner of the Content Producers Wiki.  View profile

  • There were two nooses, not three.
  • There was no initial outrage by the students over the nooses.
  • The nooses were taken down because students were playing with them.
The students who hung the nooses had previously been forced to serve a month in an alternative school before their suspension.

10 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Chadd De Las Casas9/26/2007

    Fighting is two kids punching each other. What happened here was six kids laying in wait and beating a single boy. There was no "fight" involved.

  • Monique Finley9/26/2007

    Very interesting information. Thank you for sharing. I think it is an abohorance to find injustice anywhere. It happens. The nooses may or may not have been involved. But sending a kid to jail for 22-100 years for fighting is excessive.

  • Lori Piper9/25/2007

    interesting read!!!

  • Brant McLaughlin9/24/2007

    Superior reporting, Chadd. In addition, I've heard it reported that the so-called "white tree" was not even "white"; that is, kids of different ethnicities and races hung out there, not just white kids. Makes one wonder, as I always do when I hear stories like this, what those particular, excluded black kids (if they even were truly excluded) did behavior-wise to make their company less than desirable. Well, we know that they are the type who gang-beat other kids into unconsciousness; things that make you go "huh". Somebody, stop the madness!

  • Chadd De Las Casas9/24/2007

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070922/ap_on_re_us/a_place_called_jena

  • Khara House9/23/2007

    PS-- You could PM them to me, too :)

  • Khara House9/22/2007

    Could you maybe list them? I'd be very interested in reading up on it more myself!

  • Chadd De Las Casas9/22/2007

    Primarily the Associated Press. Apparently when my internet connection got snuffed, I forgot to replace the resource links.

  • Khara House9/22/2007

    I'm not doubting your information, but I was wondering what your sources for this piece were?

  • Ria Robinson9/22/2007

    Good point. I wouldn't have even known that! For all our horrid offenses, humanity is good at one thing- being quick to point fingers.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.