I'm not being snide. Corporate philosophy not so long ago would have dictated that making a fine fluffy profit dictates breaking many eggs. And so be it. Now we have advanced this cruel outlook to the cold consideration of risk v. reward. Realizing the madness and futility of even considering perfection corporate giants must coolly regard an acceptable number of deaths to be entwined into the bottom line. Cigarette and Pharmaceutical companies print black box warnings absolving themselves from the culpability of directly dealing out death via their product. Auto manufacturers have always made unsafe choices and will only consider recall until the death toll becomes newsworthy. Tour the toxic wastelands of chemical Louisiana (just outside of New Orleans) to get an idea of how little companies and the government that is supposed to supervise them cares. Guess it's better than strapping an unwitting Chinese with dynamite and sending him deep into the mountainside to advance the tunnel, but by what degree?
Whether it is to remove the Indians or bomb the Japanese these mortal decisions somehow relate to the cruel bottom line. Upon closer consideration they are all risk v. reward determinations and related to the grand macroeconomics of America. Humanity is considered in degrees.
The logic is inescapable as fire. Earth and all its inhabitants are to be used. The thinking monkey is in charge. Philosophy then becomes important and dangerous. Remember Hitler perverted Kierkegaard, Lenin/Marx and Christianity/Jesus. The ultimate effect of compromise is that some people, not all people will die. The universal acceptance of wealth v. poverty leads us to dangerous thinking.
The infantile predilection to instant gratification guides most of our non reflective decisions and beyond. Allen Greenspan admits his lifelong belief in deregulation was simply wrong. Great minds cause big problems. Basic cultures tend toward self preservation, not without some human sacrifice. Where, you may ask, are the Aztecs and Mayans now? The way has been paved but we walk around it to better our position. The battle of good v. evil is subtle and infused with nuance. The problem is within our thinking. Like Greenspan, accept one false premise and your whole life may be corrupted. The more I study philosophy the more I appreciate common sense.
Yes, the path is narrow but easy to follow. Be polite, do unto others, teach and love the children and be kind to yourself.
Published by greg skidmore
30 years a professional chef now retired and involved in commentary, creative writing and all things lyrical View profile
How to Be an Effective Room Parent for Your Child's ClassIf you're just been asked to be a room parent for your child's class, you may not know what to do first. Here are a few tips to help you out.- I'm Going to Be a Father!Finding out you're going to be a parent can be unnerving. But at 20 years old? It's like kids having kids...
- How to Be a Nobody, and Why (Part 2)Stop trying to be what you are not. All you are really looking for is the freedom to simply be yourself in the now. And then, who knows, you will probably find yourself respected, appreciated, and admired for being...
- How to Get a GED in St. GeorgeHow to Get a GED degree in St. George
- Joe Stack Manifesto Here - Who was He? - Pilot Who Flew His Plane into the IRS
- Besouro Set to Break into the Mainstream
- A Gamer's Guide to the Sims 2
- On Bringing Open Philosophical Discourse Back to the Dinner Table
- Into the Storm Review
- Sean Penn's Adaption of Into the Wild; Starring Emile Hirsch
- Eight Surefire Ways to Be a High Flying Career Woman



