The Whole Truth About Two and a Half Men

The Best at Being the Worst

Nora Beane
In every show buisness award program there is much competition to see who is the best in every imaginable category.We know the regulars like Best Actor and Best Actress. We look forward to learning which is the Best Comedy or Variety Show. There is often great competition in determining which show is presented by the best ensemble cast. This season of Two and a Half Men has opened up the question of whether or not it might be time to initiate an award for the show that surpasses all others in their category for really not being good. Simply put, this award would be given for the show that proved itself the Best at Being the Worst. " Two and A Half Men" seems a likely candidate to dominate the field and here's why.

1. The Script. What immediately strikes even the most casual viewer who tunes in to "two and a Half Men" is the repetitively immature and banal quality of the language used each week. The script writers seem incapable of, or unwilling to, put together more than 5 minutes of on screen dialog without making a sexually explicit or anatomically obvious reference. On those rare instances when a viewer escapes this boring barrage they can expect to be "entertained" with the latest in junior high toilet humor.

The writers seem to have missed the college course work in creativity and the text chapters on avoiding the cheap laugh. They appear to be oblivious to the fact that sitcoms really can be written without constant body part/toilet illusion humor. "Everybody Loves Raymond" and "Frazier" are two obvious examples of shows which repeatedly demonstrated creative humor. These were not "goodie two shoes" shows. They won the big awards and got the big audience shares. What they didn't do was dumb down their scripts or go for the easy laugh. They gave their audiences a little credit for wanting quality in comedy and they made it work.

For some reason the creators, producers, directors and writers of "Two and a Half Men" have chosen another approach . The result has been
a show that can be described only as being the best at being the worst.

2. Offensive All the Way Around. It's quite possible to watch "Two and a Half Men " and come away thinking that this show is really offensive to women. After all, women on the show are typically objectified, devalued, manipulated and simply used in almost every half hour presentation. Even Charlie and Allen's mother seems inserted in the show to humorously portray a mother who is heartless, non-nurturing and interested only in self gratification. While genetically this might explain her sons' behaviors, it only adds to the negative portrayal of women on this show.

To be fair, men don't really come across much better on "Two and a Half Men" then their female counterparts. Watching Charlie's cavorting each week aren't viewers getting the message: look, this is how men behave? They want either to have sex or get drunk or both . Women really shouldn't expect anything better from men. Men shouldn't expect anything better from themselves. It really is about all they are capable of. All we can really do is laugh at them.

Those who look for a better image of men in the person of Allen will be quickly disappointed. The bottom line there suggests that those men who try to live slightly more moral, dependable and respectable lives , a la Allen, really are doomed to become nerds with no life whatsoever. "Two and a Half Men", by offering a menu so potentially offensive to anyone and everyone of either gender again succeeds only at being the best at being the worst among sitcoms.

3. It's All About Relationships A much used flash word in modern society is "relationships" . America's fascination with relationships helped to hoist "Friends" to its consistently high ratings and popularity. People were consumed by the relationship between Ross and Rachel, between Chandler and Monica and between Joey or Phobie and whoever.

In "Two and a Half Men" what stands out is not solidarity of relationships but rather the variety of ways in which relationships can be trivialized or trashed. Little value is placed on loyalty, caring or respect . The guide for relationships on "Two and a Half Men" seems to be to pursue a relationship only if it offers benefits that greatly exceed the investment you need to make for the relationship to work. But don't worry very much if a relationship folds. They are after all a dime a dozen.

By debasing relationships, "Two and a Half Men" keeps its record in tact for being the best at being the worst.

4. Making a Statement On paper, "Two and a Half Men" appears to have extraordinary potential to be one of those special sitcoms that can be funny but make a worthwhile and uplifting statement as well . In a nation where half of all marriages end in divorce, "Two and a Half Men" could have been an excellent vehicle to encourage all parts of a divided family. It could have touched upon brothers helping one another to manage more or less on their own. It could have sent out a lot of positive subliminal messages and still have been a very funny and well received show.

Somewhere along the road to air time a decision was made not to take a chance on a good story but to go for the quick laugh. That choice resulted in the show we see each week ( if you are still watching) that excels only at being the best at being the worst.

Published by Nora Beane

I am a former high school history teacher and Director of Religious Education with a total of 27 years of active experience as teacher and administrator. I am now a semi retired freelance writer. I have two...  View profile

  • The script of "Two and a Half Men" is too repetitive in its use of sexual jokes and toilet humor.
  • The show offers humor that is offensive to men and women alike
  • The show too frequently debased human relationships .

7 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Matt3/3/2011

    Well using the term nerd to describe a group makes yourself no better. What are you mad at? The show or the fact that people really act this way?

  • Philip Theibert4/16/2010

    Yes - but I love that show- I can't explain why and what you say is so true, but I am drawn, perhaps as most men are, to Charlie as a role model, which merely shows....?

  • Word10/28/2009

    This show is more sinister then it appears. If you take it for the face value, it is about a bachelor trying to get laid. On the other side, it is trying to promote homosexuality.

    What am I talking about?

    If you look closely at Charlie's refrigerator, the front, almost all the seasons, you will notice two black guys shaking hands. If you look at the bottom, one black guy is shaking the others enlarged boner.

    This show also promotes the eye of Horus, pyrmids, and satanism. If you look for clues in the background, you will understand.

    Peace.

  • Yes, no, maybe.9/7/2009

    You certainly present a different perspective and that's fine. However, I do not think anyone considers Charlie to be a role model or is being influenced adversely in their attitudes to men or women. Lighten up!

    The Cranes were over the top and the Harpers are not? Charlie is a caricature of a womanizer and Alan is an exaggeration of an obsessive, wimpy, clueless man.

    PS Half of all marriages do NOT end in divorce. That claim was based on a misreading of the fact that in one year there were X number of marriages and X/2 divorces. Someone who was statistically-challenged misinterpreted those numbers. The media and conservatives ran with it, naturally.

  • Steve5/2/2009

    Gee Lima,

    Lighten up a little. I have friends ranging from feminists to mysoginists who, although they may not agree with the content, agree that the Two and One Half Men scripts are brilliant.

    Do us a favor. Please reply and concoct a couple of paragraphs that will make us laugh out loud. Show us how easy it is to write hilarious lines. Show us that you're the qualified expert you claim to be. You might paraphrase a few existing lines and morph them into equivalents that are redeeming rather than degrading......... we're waiting.

    Steve

  • DH3/11/2009

    Oh, and it's "allusion", not "illusion". If you're gonna be an intellectual snob, use a spell-checker.

  • D H3/11/2009

    Whoever wrote this is getting way too upset and serious about a TV show. The fact is that the jokes on this show, if sexual in nature, are often quite witty. Not every show can be (the often boring and irritating) Everybody Loves Raymond or Frasier (which the writer has spelled wrong, BTW) - and even the wonderful Frasier was a spin-off of Cheers, which had the misogynistic Sam Malone as its central character. Moreover, the characters of Charlie and Alan are at least as believable as the over-the-top wusses Niles and Frasier Crane. The insertion of the female shrink a few seasons back was ingenious - and her exploration of both Charlie and Alan's psychological failings is funny and does add some depth. Bottom line, though: sitcoms are intended to entertain, and this one does make people laugh - well, people who don't take themselves and TV sitcoms too seriously, anyway.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.