Thirteen Year Old Girl Strip Searched for Ibuprofen

Court of Appeals Says the School Violated Her Privacy

Daniel Dunkin - Content Writer and Artist
Does this story aggravate you as much as it does me? The vice principle, (I did not capitalize that title because he does not deserve the title), of a middle school in Arizona, after another student was cornered and in her own defense shifted the blame to Savanah Redding, ordered the 13 year old girl to be strip searched when a search of her back pack did not reveal Prescription strength Ibuprofen.

The biggest shame award goes to the Vice Principle. Shame on you for being in a position of authority and not handling it with enough wisdom to find a solution short of violating a 13 year old honor students constitutional rights. Apparently this VP attended todays public school system because he obviously does not understand the United States Constitution and the rights to privacy. We aren't talking about a gun or a knife, we aren't talking about heroin, we are talking about a double strength over the counter medication akin to aspirin. Ibuprofen posed a threat to no one in or out of the school, anymore than over the counter Tylenol does. Not only should the parents be awarded enough to insure you are paying for years to come so you will learn what America is about, you should also be reduced to a position where your authority over children will be eliminated.

The next shame award goes to 5 of the 11 judges who found in favor of the school. The first two, Judge Ronald M. Gould, joined by Judge Barry G. Silverman found in favor of the school because the law was not clear? Hello, you are judges for Pete's sake. Does a law specifically have to say, I cannot strike you with my left hand in a fight in order for it to be a violation of your rights? You win the lack of common sense award and should not be in your positions because you do not even understand what, "an individuals rights", means.

The third shame award goes to the other three judges, Judge Michael Daly Hawkins, joined by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski and Judge Carlos T. Bea, who ruled in favor of the school because they thought the strip search was constitutional. You three get to line up behind the vice principle and win the ignorance award. I thought being a judge meant you have to learn the U.S. Constitution and have some understanding of it's meaning. I believe you three judges should be strip searched because I think your partaking in some illegal substance that has altered your perception of individual rights under the Constitution. Secondly you should have to go back college for four more years majoring in the U.S. Constitution along with a thesis on the Federalist Papers.

I cannot believe that adults actually think that emotionally scarring a girl, possibly for life, is OK, and even constitutional. If this was their daughter who was a Thirteen Year old Girl Strip Searched for Ibuprofen, would they feel the same way? I don't think so. Adults should be asking themselves this questions before making rash decisions that effect the life of one of our youth in whom they should be able to place their trust. I am appalled that a vice principle of a school would act without thinking and even more appalled that 5 of 11 judges in an appeals court actually think this behavior is OK. We won't even talk about the original court that ruled out the law suit.

The next thing I disagree with is the court of appeals said the only person they can go after is the VP because his administrative assistant and the school nurse, (both women who performed the search), were acting under orders. You know what, being in someone's employ should not mean you dismiss your morals and your own common sense, and had they spoken out perhaps the VP might have had a change of mind. They were both women and they have been 13 year old girls, they should have known what they were doing.

I say to the Reddings, go for it all, get the school system, get the VP, get them all.

Published by Daniel Dunkin - Content Writer and Artist

Step father of 6, father of 2, husband of 1. Being disabled I write to help support my family, My interests are vaccine dangers, gourd growing and art, end time prophecy a new look, computers tech articles...  View profile

8 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Penny Pentecost8/12/2008

    I do of course support the rights of the child and family, and would hate for something like this to happen to my thirteen year old granddaughter. My statement was meant to support efforts by schools in general to curb the rash of weapons, drugs, acts of violence, etc, that are plaguing our schools. I am not saying that this particular child did anything wrong or that this school did anything particularly right. I would just like to see parents work with school officials and with and for their children by teaching the kids to respect themselves, their peers, and their teachers. Working rules we have anarchy and so often people who demand their personal rights forget about the rights of others. Mea culpa for any offense. BTW, nice to see some different subject matter.

  • Julia Bodeeb White8/9/2008

    Great reporting. What a horrible incident..... such idiocy in the schools.

  • Sherry W8/8/2008

    Wow... strip searched. !

  • Daniel Dunkin - Content Writer and Artist8/8/2008

    BTW Penny, the girl did follow the rules, she did NOT have this medication on her. Someone else lied about her having it and for this she was strip searched. If someone in your workplace lies and says you brought a weapon to work, should you be stripped of your most sacred right and freedom, your privacy?

  • Daniel Dunkin - Content Writer and Artist8/8/2008

    Penny and Melpol, you are both right. Yes penny, we should know and follow the rules within the system, as long as those rules do not violate morals. When morals and personal freedoms are violated as they were in this case, she has become subjective to not much less than enslavement might demand. The school had options for dealing with this issue, they could have called mom & dad, they could have handed out a suspension, but they took the word of another 12 or 13 year old girl who was, as most young kids will do, passing the buck to get her own neck out of the noose. For this a 13 year old girl should be stripped? Perhaps one of the most humilating and privacy envading acts a human, much less a child, could be put through? So if we are speeding down the road should we be strip searched because we violated a rule? There is no excuse for the vp in this case, He should follow the rules too, they are outlined in the United States Constitution and Innocent until proven guilty clause.

  • Penny Pentecost8/8/2008

    My youngest is 31 so it has been a long time since I had a kid in school. However, it was never allowed to bring any type medication to school. Even an asthma inhaler had to be registered with the school nurse and prescription meds had to be left at the nurse's office and dispensed by her. So yes, everyone should follow the rules, including parents and the kids who all know that drugs of any kind are not allowed on the student's person. I feel sorry for the young girl involved, but her parents would do well to support the school and teach their child a lesson in functioning within the system. All would be better off for it, and later when in the workplace this young girl was faced with similar problems she would know how to deal with it personally.

  • 3lilangels8/8/2008

    Well done!!!

  • Lucinda Watrous8/7/2008

    Well said. I agree. If I had been in that situation at 13, or ever, really I would have just hit the bastards and gotten whatever came to me.... bless that girl's heart for going through that.

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.