On Sept. 25, 1981, following her nomination to the bench by President Ronald Regan, Sandra Day O'Connor became the first woman to serve her nation as a Supreme Court Justice and a gigantic barrier to equal participation in government was officially hauled down. Historically it could have played out that this experiment in inclusiveness was exactly that an experiment. The appointment of of Elena Kagan will certainly seem to shut the door on nay sayers for good.
Three women on the court is no longer an experiment or a polite nod to the abilities of women. It is rather a clear statement that the issue of gender in Supreme Court appointments is officially dead. The appointment of a third women sounds the final death knell to the old boys club that once controlled the legal decision process in our nation. If, as the saying goes, a clean broom does indeed sweep clean, having three women on the high court at the same time could provide a fresh direction for the nine member panel.
One could say that having three women on the bench provides women with a solid voting bloc which could play a huge role in tight votes. Of course such a position requires one to realize that for nearly the first 200 years of our history there was a solid block of all male justices and that even today there are 6 men versus 3 women. Does anyone really think the court will divide in such a way on any decision? The election of three women forces even those who hold anti-women feelings to acknowledge that there is no more likelihood that all the women will vote together because they are women than that all the men will vote together because they are men. In short the appointment of three women to the Supreme Court should help to shed light on the fact that women, like men, are free thinkers and arrive at their opinions by individual reasoning and deserve respect equal to their male counterparts
The selection of three women to fill positions on the Supreme Court is also a boon to men, especially the men on the court. They no longer have to harbor even the slightest thought that words exchanged during argumentation or discussion of cases will be seen as sexist. The six men may actually feel more liberated, if only subconsciously , to speak to the three women as they do one another without wondering whether or not their words or actions would be perceived as piling on or ganging up on one or even two women justices. If there was a need for greater civility between the genders on the court adding a third woman justice may just fill the bill.
Finally the selection of a third woman justice to our Supreme Court can send a positive signal to all Americans and all of America's critics. Americans may well benefit from a court that is now more gender balanced than ever before in our history because women will bring their own unique take on society and jurisprudence to cases that reach the high court. Any one of the three may individually have the ability to shine an entirely new light on some exceptionally old issues simply because she has grown up looking at this nation from a totally different perspective. The results of that different approach could be considerable.
Internationally, those who have long mocked the U. S. for talking about equality and yet continuing to elevate men to positions of national prominence with far more regularity than women, may have been somewhat muted. It would appear that at last the country has stepped up and delivered on its promises in a very visible and convincing way.
Giving three highly intelligent and well schooled women a chance to serve can only have positive repercussions.
Published by Nora Beane
I am a former high school history teacher and Director of Religious Education with a total of 27 years of active experience as teacher and administrator. I am now a semi retired freelance writer. I have two... View profile
- Gender Influenced Justices: Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader GinsburgIt is essential to understand the importance of gender influenced jurisprudence on Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Ginsburg, and how they have helped modernize patriarchal abortion laws for the greater good of women over...
Obama's New Supreme Court DecisionObama's Supreme Court nomination, a major appointment in his second 100 days. Let him decide without media and public pressure. - FDR and the Supreme CourtA detailed study of the "court packing" episode of 1936-37 and the development of American judiciary during the Depression/New Deal.
- Supreme Court's View on Women, Family and Politics Through Abortion CasesAn analysis on the Court's view on the changing roles of women and the family in the modern era.
- How Women Have Shattered the Glass Ceiling in the WorkplaceMaintain your hope of advancing as a working lady! See how working women are breaking the glass ceiling!
- Politics in the Supreme Court
- No Justices No Peace: An Open Letter to the US Supreme Court
- Supreme Court Interferes on How and when Women Have Abortions
- The Impact and Legacy of Supreme Court Juistice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Late Term Abortion
- Barack Obama Appoints First Gay to Supreme Court in Elena Kagan, or Has He?
- Elena Kagan Nominated and Joe the Plumber Elected
- Three siting female justices on the Supremen Court is a first in American History
- It is unlikely that the three women would vote on decisions as a block.
- Three women justices could provide a fresh look at old problems



