Tiger Woods Crash, a Crash Course in Media Stupidity

Marc Rubin
Usually the media shows it stupidity in the inept way they cover politics, Obama, and issues affecting the country both foreign and domestic. But the stupidity of the media showed itself once again with the Tiger Woods story.

The only reason its a story at all is because it's a potential sex scandal, the media's favorite topic. If you remember, like Howard Beale in the movie "Network" Bill Clinton became the first president impeached for higher ratings.

It was beyond obvious that Woods was cheating on his wife which led to a domestic dispute which led to his car accident backing out his driveway and a window bashed in with a golf club that was not used to free an unconscious Woods from the car. And now Woods has come out and admitted the obvious.

Of course what makes the media look so stupid is that they kept asking the question, why wont Tiger talk to the police?

The answer was Tiger wouldnt talk to the police because he knew that anything he told them would be a matter of public record. He and his lawyer also knew that lying to the police or on a police report is a felony. So there was no way he was going to turn an embarrassing situation into a felony and there is no way he wanted anyone to know the truth. But now with a second woman, a 24 year old cocktail waitress who said she had an affair with him and has the text messages to prove it, Woods decided he had no choice and has come clean.

Why the news media couldnt figure this out earlier is important only as it pertains to subjects much more important to the country than Tiger Woods making a hole in one with a nightclub hostess. Its why you cant trust the media when it comes to their reporting on anything, from health care to Afghanistan. And why they should do everyone a favor and stay out of the speculation business because they are lousy at it.

If they couldnt figure out the truth about Tiger Woods 2:25 a.m car accident, they certainly aren't going to have any insight on anything important. So, to paraphrase a line from the poem, "Tiger, tiger burning bright, what stupidity will the news media bring tonight?" The answer is, anything they put on the air..

The story of Woods' affair was broken by the National Enquirer. They may not deal in "news you can use" but unlike the New York Times, CNN,and Fox News, the Enquirer, believe it or not, has proved to be the most reliable of all major national news organizations. Their accuracy rate is the best of any national news organization. They almost never get it wrong. And they virtually never print anything unless they know its true ( remember Jennifer Flowers?) And its been proved once again.

Chances are, Rachel Uchitel, meaning no harm to Woods, shot her mouth off to someone about her affair with Woods, and her confidant either told someone else who sold the story to the Enquirer or did it themselves. But the Enquirer would not have run with the story, not when it involves someone whose image is as squeaky clean as Tiger Woods, unless they had enough to back it up.

It didnt take Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein to figure out what the Woods crash was really all about.. But as a professor of journalism once pointed out, a scandal isnt a scandal unless the news media wants to make it one. And in Tiger Woods case that is probably a decision being made right now by news directors behind closed doors.

  • The media couldnt get the story right in spite of the facts staring them in the face
  • The cover story Woods concocted was preposterous
  • The media was either incredibly dumb or covering for Woods
The National Enquirer has the best track record of any national news organization in terms of the accuracy of its stories.

1 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Moeursalen12/4/2009

    So...was your point that Tiger Woods coverage was bad journalism? To me, it's not an important story because it's about one human being's private business (except for the car crash). It's kind of ill that the press got so involved in this story. I respect Woods for living privately and just for himself rather than parading about being the celebrity know-it-allcommentator upon everything from climate change to foreign policy. It's also kind of ill the way the media has to bring him down now because he made some mistakes in his personal life. The only thing the public really owns about Tiger Woods is when he's on the golf course, where's he's one of the world's great golfers. He hasn't much put himself on the entertainment stage, has he?

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.