Time to Adopt the Designated Hitter Rule in MLB's National League
Avoid Pitcher Injuries at Bat and on the Bases
The DH or no-DH rule has been controversial since its introduction in 1973 in the American League. In June last year the rhetoric exploded after AL New York Yankee star pitcher Chien-Ming Wang severely injured his foot while running the bases during an interleague game in Houston versus the NL Astros and was unable to play for the rest of the season. Hank Steinbrenner, Yankees co-chairman, angry over the loss of his ace pitcher, subsequently fumed that the NL should join the 21st century and adopt the DH rule.
Although I've followed NL teams for the past three decades, on the DH subject I have to agree with the AL's Mr. Steinbrenner. Major League Baseball (MLB) is a business which exists to make a profit. Teams have made huge investments in their players and want and need them to remain healthy and able to perform at their top level to maximize the teams' chances of success and attract the most fans. Teams especially don't want to see their star players get injured, even more so if the injuries can be avoided. That is precisely Mr. Steinbrenner's point, that his top pitcher was hurt unnecessarily, because he was only running the bases after batting due to the NL's no-DH rule. Under AL rules his pitcher never would have been on base at all, so his injury was completely needless and avoidable. With Wang out of the rotation, the Yankees went on to miss the playoffs for the first time in fourteen years, a serious hit to the Yankees' pocketbook.
Consider the situation in professional football. The NFL has instituted several rules in recent years to protect the quarterbacks, arguably the most valuable players for most teams, from injuries so as to keep them healthy and in the game. A sound business decision. Since pitchers are baseball's equivalent of quarterbacks, with the ball in their hands at the start of each play, it makes sense for MLB to have rules to protect them from undue harm as well. The DH accomplishes that in the AL by keeping pitchers out of the batter's box and off the bases.
Another frequent DH rule argument comes from baseball purists, who believe that every player should swing a bat just like when they were kids, or because that's how the game was originally played. These traditionalists support the NL no-DH style of play.
However, one can again look to pro football to see that a game doesn't necessarily suffer by moving away from tradition and the game's origins. In backyard football, kids play every down, offense then defense. As the game has grown up, football has evolved into a game of specialists. Nowadays, football is so specialized that some players are third down outside linebacker only, or kickoff return only, for example. Yet no one complains that these football specialists smear or defile the game by not being the well-rounded players like they were as kids. And the NFL is today at the peak of its popularity with American fans.
Similarly, just because a pitcher swung a bat as a kid, there's no reason he has to do it now. Throughout modern society in this day and age, specialists are preferred. It's time for the NL to recognize that pitchers are specialists and treat them as such, which the AL's DH rule does. Fans can certainly adapt to this modernization of the game and quit griping about tradition, as they have for the NFL's specialization and rule changes.
Additionally, do baseball purists really enjoy watching NL pitchers at the plate? It's nearly a guaranteed rally-killing out every time the pitcher comes up. That's no fun to watch. After all, the name of the game is to score runs. And which would you rather see, your team score lots of runs or only a few? By sending a good hitting DH up to bat rather than a lousy hitting pitcher, more offense is introduced.
Hank Steinbrenner was right. The National League needs to adopt the designated hitter rule, not just for interleague games, but full time. Pitchers have a difficult enough time just throwing the ball and remaining healthy. Keeping pitchers on the mound, out of the batter's box, and off the bases also makes sound business sense. Come on, NL and MLB powers-that-be, adopt the DH rule throughout baseball and prevent unnecessary pitcher injuries. It's time to level the playing field with the same rules for both leagues.
Published by Gary A Cain
For 25 years I was a research chemist for pharmaceutical companies. I m now a freelance writer. Visit http://garyacain.com for links to all my published work. Visit http://HumorVolcano.com for my site ded... View profile
- Game of Baseball Explained: Role of the Designated HitterThe designated hitter rule is outdated and unfavorable in baseball, and without it, it would shorten game times, give managers more strategy to the game, decrease the separation between the two leagues, and make pitch...
- Why the American League May Have Stronger Post SeasonsWhy does the American League seem to be the stronger of the two leagues world series competition? This is one theory and it has nothing to do with Designated Hitters, softer competition, or quality of pitching.
- It's Time for Major League Baseball to Abolish the DHThe DH has more than served its purpose in Major League Baseball. It's time for the DH to go.
Bad Inventions that are Still Better Than Baseball's Designated HitterOver the years there are been many dumb people with many dumb ideas but even some of the dumbest ideas are better than baseball's designated hitter.- A Case for the Designated HitterWhy Keeping the Designated Hitter is the Right Thing To Do
- Hey National League! It's the 21st Century. Adopt the DH Rule Already!
- Small Market Teams Can Find Major League Baseball Success
- Should Major League Baseball Keep the Designated Hitter Position?
- 2007 National League Central Preview
- Top 10 Blogs About Major League Baseball
- Major League Baseball All-Star Lance Berkman Wants to Star for Christ
- Roger Clemens: The Greatest Pitcher of All-Time


2 Comments
Post a CommentThe no DH rule keeps players safe. Making the pitcher bat makes for less hit batsmen in NL vs AL.
Also having the DH makes all 25 needed. Basically in NL each team uses 2-3 DHs (called PH) in a typical game.
Also the true talents that can pitch and hit get wasted. For example CC S. is a better hitter than Jetter, just wasted with the Yanks... Could you imagine Ruth pitching and never know what kind of Hitter he was playing for the Red Sox and the Yanks?
I'm sorry, but making decisions about the rules of America's pastime based on business has nothing to do with the great game of baseball. Running the bases backwards would be interesting and attract some attention, why not try that? No strategy, no pinch hitters, no bunting, it's not baseball. It's a joke. The DH rule has tipped the scales toward the American League. Players gravitate toward the league that will lengthen their career. I call the American League the "Cheater League." They played the game by the rules for a long time before 1973 and then owners like Hank Steinbrenner could see an opportunity for an advantage and they jumped at the chance. American League pitchers don't get lifted for a pinch hitter in a close game. As far as I'm concerned the great pitching records by American League pitchers are all in question because they can't fairly be compared to the great pitchers from baseball's storied past. The game wasn't invented to make it safer or easier for specia